Luke Toki who won the "celebrity" version.Shocking. I don’t count the All Stars one but technically it is. Who won the other season that I cannot remember?
Many of these points show you have zero concept of the original premise of Big Brother. Not to mention, the scope of what they were capable of including in a 20 minute Daily Show back for 8 years compared to what's in a 45+ minute episode today. Try again.The daily show isn't made for the people tuned into the live feeds, it's made for a wider audience - largely casual viewers who rely on simplified narrative hooks. Ed getting a strike is a narrative dead-end, whereas a romance - which has implications beyond the two people involved - is much more compelling.
This is really the downside of the live feeds - enabling a certain sect of hardcore viewers to feel entitled to demand what should/shouldn't be shown. There are things that I would have liked to see make the final cut, sure, but I'm not going to write a manifesto of complaints as if there are some human rights violations happening. That energy could be put into more productive real world issues.
Beyond voting to evict, the original format was never about audience interference. It was observational fish-bowl TV, shaped by and to the liking of "Big Brother".Many of these points show you have zero concept of the original premise of Big Brother.
Some of my brain cells died reading that.a romance - which has implications beyond the two people involved - is much more compelling.
I completely agree - this is what makes Big Brother so fascinating to watch. But what also makes it fascinating is that the viewers should get to see all facets and sides of the HMs, and (live streams aside, as it’s only a small portion of the viewers) currently we are not. I think that’s a main point being raised in this conversation.There is a balance to be struck between producers intervening when necessary and producers stepping in to resolve issues the housemates should be able to resolve amongst themselves.
Huh? Big Brother is “observational fish-bowl TV” - that’s the entire premise of it. The audience are supposed to be a fly on the wall with an occasional say, such as who’s evicted.Beyond voting to evict, the original format was never about audience interference. It was observational fish-bowl TV, shaped by and to the liking of "Big Brother".
I agree. I've been watching Season 1. Back then, if something happened bad or out of the ordinary, they'd find a way to include it narratively. Heck, on Day 3, Gemma got injured and ended up needing to go to hospital. They even showed us footage from the hospital on the following Sunday Nominations show. Do you think that would happen now?Many of these points show you have zero concept of the original premise of Big Brother. Not to mention, the scope of what they were capable of including in a 20 minute Daily Show back for 8 years compared to what's in a 45+ minute episode today. Try again.
Isn't that why scripted dramas and soap operas exist? Why does the real world have to be "soap opera-fied" to satiate braindead viewers?The daily show isn't made for the people tuned into the live feeds, it's made for a wider audience - largely casual viewers who rely on simplified narrative hooks. Ed getting a strike is a narrative dead-end, whereas a romance - which has implications beyond the two people involved - is much more compelling.
This is exactly right. From the Nine version onward it became more about crafted storylines that were almost manufactured. That is not to say the OG 10 era didn't do this, but it was in the context of what was happening and they would build the daily show around that. It's also which (and I know this will be controversial) but I actually preferred the 30 min daily shows. They aren't viable in today's commercial lense of a network, but it was more raw, and you saw a wider view of the housemates of the days happenings because of the limited time, where necessary they would then extend it to 1 hour when it was warranted - but not often.Isn't that why scripted dramas and soap operas exist? Why does the real world have to be "soap opera-fied" to satiate braindead viewers?
If I wanted to watch a fake romance, I'll watch Brooke marry Ridge for the 13,647th time on The Bold and the Beautiful.
Hear hear!This is exactly right. From the Nine version onward it became more about crafted storylines that were almost manufactured. That is not to say the OG 10 era didn't do this, but it was in the context of what was happening and they would build the daily show around that. It's also which (and I know this will be controversial) but I actually preferred the 30 min daily shows. They aren't viable in today's commercial lense of a network, but it was more raw, and you saw a wider view of the housemates of the days happenings because of the limited time, where necessary they would then extend it to 1 hour when it was warranted - but not often.
Now because they are upwards of 60 minutes, there is more filler content that more so creates a narrative and more "storyline" as apposed to it being observational and having to craft it into an episode story in that sense.
Partly also why a lot of us hate the underscoring of production music, because they are trying to MAKE people feel a way throughout the show.
Soppy music in a crying scene - you need to feel sad for this person.
Intense dramatic music - you should feel that this is conflict.
When really when you take those away, majority wouldn't feel the way its being pushed and produced like a soap opera. It goes against what @imsocold is saying - its not observational anymore its manufactured
BBUK shows that punishing the housemates can be an entertaining plot line.Ed getting a strike is a narrative dead-end,
Don’t block a thread.enabling a certain sect of hardcore viewers to feel entitled to demand what should/shouldn't be shown
Same. Marley is from my suburb; have seen him walking around a few times with his girlfriend. His parents still live here.Only watched the first season of the 7 one.
Saw commercials for another season and immediately picked Marley as my favourite. No shock that he ended up winning.
The third season (love one) I didn’t even bother looking at the commercials.
Give it a bone ploiseI cannot believe that seven produced more episodes of BB than there are of Kath and Kim
Did someone call my THEXY name?A reminder from TVTonight they can speak to a psychologist off camera which possibly explains why Holly vanished for a lengthy period the other night.
![]()
Do Big Brother contestants have access to a psychologist? | TV Tonight
Put through the Reality wringer, vulnerable contestants bare their souls for cameras, and sometimes off camera too.tvtonight.com.au
In the case of these housemates, I think they're more likely to ask for PsychoTheRapist than Psychotherapist...Did someone call my THEXY name?
I caught that part too. I do wish we were shown any telling offs and rule breaks.They started talking about the different Big Brother voices and then COCO was like "PRODUCTION TALK" and they stopped. Clearly have been told to not talk about the production now.
Lol Jane "I have one egg, do you want to go poach it"