Duty of Care Failure? Concerns Over BB Management of Housemate Conflict & Discrimination and Authority.

The daily show isn't made for the people tuned into the live feeds, it's made for a wider audience - largely casual viewers who rely on simplified narrative hooks. Ed getting a strike is a narrative dead-end, whereas a romance - which has implications beyond the two people involved - is much more compelling.

This is really the downside of the live feeds - enabling a certain sect of hardcore viewers to feel entitled to demand what should/shouldn't be shown. It's editorial overreach. There are things that I would have liked to see make the final cut, sure, but I'm not going to write a manifesto of complaints as if there are some human rights violations happening. That energy could be put into more productive real world issues.
 
imsocold said:
The daily show isn't made for the people tuned into the live feeds, it's made for a wider audience - largely casual viewers who rely on simplified narrative hooks. Ed getting a strike is a narrative dead-end, whereas a romance - which has implications beyond the two people involved - is much more compelling.

This is really the downside of the live feeds - enabling a certain sect of hardcore viewers to feel entitled to demand what should/shouldn't be shown. There are things that I would have liked to see make the final cut, sure, but I'm not going to write a manifesto of complaints as if there are some human rights violations happening. That energy could be put into more productive real world issues.
Click to expand...
Many of these points show you have zero concept of the original premise of Big Brother. Not to mention, the scope of what they were capable of including in a 20 minute Daily Show back for 8 years compared to what's in a 45+ minute episode today. Try again.
 
Last edited:
the Theorist said:
Many of these points show you have zero concept of the original premise of Big Brother.
Click to expand...
Beyond voting to evict, the original format was never about audience interference. It was observational fish-bowl TV, shaped by and to the liking of "Big Brother".
 
I'd suggest re-reading what was written below, but @imsocold still won't agree. Perhaps a few should go back to watching Married At First Sight.

the Theorist

Post in thread 'Duty of Care Failure? Concerns Over BB Management of Housemate Conflict & Discrimination and Authority.'

Brekkie said:
There is a balance to be struck between producers intervening when necessary and producers stepping in to resolve issues the housemates should be able to resolve amongst themselves.
Click to expand...
I completely agree - this is what makes Big Brother so fascinating to watch. But what also makes it fascinating is that the viewers should get to see all facets and sides of the HMs, and (live streams aside, as it’s only a small portion of the viewers) currently we are not. I think that’s a main point being raised in this conversation.

The feelings and thoughts shared in this thread are valid, but I do...
  • Like
 
imsocold said:
Beyond voting to evict, the original format was never about audience interference. It was observational fish-bowl TV, shaped by and to the liking of "Big Brother".
Click to expand...
Huh? Big Brother is “observational fish-bowl TV” - that’s the entire premise of it. The audience are supposed to be a fly on the wall with an occasional say, such as who’s evicted.

This is where the original run was supreme. This bite sized, spoon fed version is an echo of its former self. It’s much better than what 7 produced but it’s still not hitting the mark.

No one is writing a manifesto of complaints. We’re simply stating our point of view on what’s actually working and what they’re failing to do. You’re on here saying you’re okay with this updated “OG format.” Most of these TikTok viewers probably have no idea at what this show is capable of being because they aren’t old enough to remember it. You get to post your thoughts and so do the people that expected a little better.
 
the Theorist said:
Many of these points show you have zero concept of the original premise of Big Brother. Not to mention, the scope of what they were capable of including in a 20 minute Daily Show back for 8 years compared to what's in a 45+ minute episode today. Try again.
Click to expand...
I agree. I've been watching Season 1. Back then, if something happened bad or out of the ordinary, they'd find a way to include it narratively. Heck, on Day 3, Gemma got injured and ended up needing to go to hospital. They even showed us footage from the hospital on the following Sunday Nominations show. Do you think that would happen now?
 
imsocold said:
The daily show isn't made for the people tuned into the live feeds, it's made for a wider audience - largely casual viewers who rely on simplified narrative hooks. Ed getting a strike is a narrative dead-end, whereas a romance - which has implications beyond the two people involved - is much more compelling.
Click to expand...
Isn't that why scripted dramas and soap operas exist? Why does the real world have to be "soap opera-fied" to satiate braindead viewers?

If I wanted to watch a fake romance, I'll watch Brooke marry Ridge for the 13,647th time on The Bold and the Beautiful.
 
The literal point of Big Brother is to provide context and a full balanced edit on the broadcast episodes of the HMs personalities. That was drilled in to the BBAU audience for years and it was executed more than perfectly for many seasons. Fast forward to 2025, things like deliberately leaving out key personality traits because it suits them, or using music to persuade viewers’ opinions, is setting an agenda and precedent that doesn’t belong on Big Brother.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top