Zcsund1234
Well-Known Member
"Who wins? You decide" has been the show's tagline ever since this season started. Surely that would have given them a clue?
Sonia might as well just say "One Winner you decide, (out of whats left).
"Who wins? You decide" has been the show's tagline ever since this season started. Surely that would have given them a clue?
Chad had to wear Sarah’s tight small shortsPlease explain
Really wouldn't put it past them to have a shortlist of one for viewers to vote from.Sonia might as well just say "One Winner you decide, (out of whats left).
It was probably a request by the producers to generate viewable content from a “boring” cast.I thought the dirtying of the dishes was a rather creative and harmless prank from the good ol alpha alliance.
Liked so much that they are willing to hand him $250k..... They think that Kieran is more of a threat than Daniel.. Do these people have any sense at all? lolHe seems to be well liked in the house
Liked so much that they are willing to hand him $250k..... They think that Kieran is more of a threat than Daniel.. Do these people have any sense at all? lol
This is not as farfetched as it may sound, though Dan's acting skills were far below par.It was probably a request by the producers to generate viewable content from a “boring” cast.
"Feared" is more like it.He seems to be well liked in the house
The problem is that Sarah is habitually the underdog and as such will always latch on to the seemingly strongest. No amount of thinking and speculating will overcome this survival instinct.I was backing a Sarah win, but after last night I withdraw that.
I can see why Sophie wouldn't vote alone, but if Sarah had the sense to lock in her vote for Matt he'd be gone, evening up the odds for both of them and allowing them to boot Daniel next time.
Seriously. Sarah could have made several, far superior, resume orientated moves :I was backing a Sarah win, but after last night I withdraw that.
I can see why Sophie wouldn't vote alone, but if Sarah had the sense to lock in her vote for Matt he'd be gone, evening up the odds for both of them and allowing them to boot Daniel next time.
Seriously. Sarah could have made several, far superior, resume orientated moves :
What she has done, and I assume her thinking is, that she will be the swing vote in the next vote, and assuming that each group will be coming to her to take the other out. She seems to have missed that Chad is basically bro'd up to Dan and Mat so deep his blinkers are on. There is no chance she is going to win the next challenge, but she still really seems certain that her (weak) strategy is gonna work for her. That was a bad move and doesn't make her look good, regardless if the Australian public are going to be voting on strategy or likability. In addition, her decision secures her "pretty annoying" screen time.
- Said to "Kieran" - let's do a final 3, herself - Kieran & Sophie. Then told Sophie she would 100% vote with her if she voted Mat, and takes her to the final 3 with her.
- Said to "Sophie", ok let's do final 3, and made sure Sophie agrees. Ok, you want Mat, let's go for a final 3 with Chad. So Kieran next. This would be an easy path since they all seem to want Kieran out like there's no tomorrow.
Thankfully that annoying screen time will result in her likely being sent to the white room with Kieran.
That brings me to another point. Most Big Brother viewers, probably haven't been watching Survivor. Thus the whole 'strategy' format of this new season is almost irrelevant to the voting public. The public are more likely to be voting on likability than strategic play. A jury vote often tends to insure a blend of all these things, but this vote is being put into the voting public's hands, which will more than likely completely disregard strategy and favor looks / personality. Thus I would argue that having a little strategy to get yourself screen-time, but coming across as likable is preferable.
I have noticed Daniel covering his tracks when he has made nasty comments about Kieran, for example saying that maybe they themselves are the fools, so he is not doing terrible in terms of self awareness of how he might be edited in.
I don't think Daniel has said anything nasty about Kieran.
Dan to BB: "I don't think he's done anything to really warrant being here this long. I think his biggest threat still - and I've said it before - is that he's so nonthreatening."
Dan to Mat in the kitchen: "One of the best things I've ever heard. You know, we're not idiots. Can't be an idiot to come this far. I think you can."
Mat: *laughs* "I think you can"
Dan: "I think you definitely can."
Dan: *laughs. "Maybe we're the idiots".
This is evidently a swipe at Kieran, calling him an idiot, unless the edit is messing with us. He did, to his advantage, cover it up by saying "maybe we're the idiots".
It is a pretty bad look for them, regardless. Still looks like they are vilifying and gloating. I added (edited) onto the post above as well that they are calling him "Thick", which was not explained clearly on the show, it was explained in such a fleeting way without showing actual footage of that (done on the cheap), thus a lot of the Australian public (as evidenced by how many people on this forum) still thinking they are calling him "thick" to ridicule him. They are coming across on TV as bullies.Lol, that's not nasty at all.
It is a pretty bad look for them, regardless. Still looks like they are vilifying and gloating. I added (edited) onto the post above as well that they are calling him "Thick", which was not explained clearly on the show, it was explained in such a fleeting way without showing actual footage of that (done on the cheap), thus a lot of the Australian public (as evidenced by how many people on this forum) still thinking they are calling him "thick" to ridicule him. They are coming across on TV as bullies.
If it's not 'bullying' - what is it?I know some on this forum like to paint Daniel as the literal reincarnation of Hitler, but to me him and Mat are just two ordinary people who find some of Kieran's habits annoying. And it's clear that the rest of the house does too.
Thinking that what Daniel and Mat are doing is bullying is an insult to the real victims of bullying imo.
If it's not 'bullying' - what is it?