Last movie you saw

Happy-Go-Lucky
A nice little film. I was annoyed with it initially as Sally Hawkins' character seemed artificial and obnoxious in her joyfulness, which I suppose rings true throughout the film, but she became endearing rather than annoying as the film went on. Hawkins' acting was terrific, and she definitely deserved the Golden Globe for her performance.

Before Sunrise
Amazingly, this is the first time I've seen it and I expected to love it. I was right! Firstly, Julie Delpy is ridiculously beautiful in this movie. They downplayed her looks but that just made her look even more attractive to me. Her and Ethan Hawke gave incredible performances. The nuances of the characters as they were slowly falling in love and then afterwards.. it just all felt so realistic. Having the film set in Vienna was an inspired choice also. Gorgeous city. The locals they encounter were really interesting too. I really need to see Before Sunset.
 
Also saw Avatar and also loved it. I actually found the visual effects so convincing that pandora to me feels like a real place and the Na'vi people seem real. It was actually amazing and beautiful to watch and I agree to see the 3D version. Definitely on my list of films to see again. Also i despise long films i usually want to be entertained in 1.5 - an hour and 40 mins max. But this I didnt even notice myself thinking about length, although my ass was numb afterwards! :-P hehe
 
^^^^Agree with everything you said james_a. Went to see Avatar today & just loved it. Didn't see the 3D version though as mini me can get a bit of motion sickness from 3D for some reason. Was just a great movie with a great message and I sooooo want to live on Pandora :D
 
Drag Me To Hell on DVD

I'm undecided about this one, there are some parts I liked and some parts I didn't but it was original I'll give them that.. definitely a horror movie though ;)

Saw 6 on DVD

Same old, same old with the torturing.. a few new traps that were good but overall seen it all before with the other Saws. Another twist at the end which I didn't even think about till I got to it and I'm still not sure if it was the final one as it says it was Jigsaws last game? 😵‍💫
 
pandora to me feels like a real place and the Na'vi people seem real. It was actually amazing and beautiful to watch


Yeah it sucks that it's not a place you can go and visit..





BTW, isn't it funny how people can be against a movie because it favoured peaceful people being murdered and having their homes and lives ruined, for the profit of outsiders who don't give a crap about their rights, culture or anything... What a terrible thing... haha You've got to be one sort of messed up bad person to think that's a bad thing..

The films more apt about something like the digging up of sacred aboriginal land to get uranium than anything like global warming. It's the history of man kind to not give a shit about the local, less advanced population when they are being colonised and exploited for money or whatever reason.
 
SPOILERS
DO NOT READ IF YOU HAVEN'T SEEN AVATAR


"Ag(w)aia" by James 'if fit ain't 3hours long, it ain't a movie' Cameron. Just got back in from the 8pm gold lounge session at ACE, Midland.

It's the story of the industrial-military complex protecting the capitalistic interests of shareholders out to strip mine a socialist culty commune world of hunter-gather semi-nudists who like their skin Blue.

How are they a socialist cult?
They clearly are an organised culture with a class system ruled by a royal family of sorts.

It's more about private companies hiring mercinaries with no boundaries to strip mine and destroy a paradise, where they don't stop to think about anything other than the greed and beauty and the true value of the place which can't be measured in dollars. Also the inherant racism and justification for evil acts for profit.


It's kinda like a CGI version of the Danish riot police mixing it with blue painted protesters at Hopencagen. :)

No not really at all. That comment makes no sense to the context of the films plot.


If you've seen the original Dune movie, you've seen this as it's the same old same old but instead of "fremen" in stilsuits riding worms, you've got CGI blueskins (sporting facial art that is oh so last year's wilderness look) riding flying lizards.

Except it's way more interesting and better made than dune. That's a very dated movie.


The big mystery of the movie was why Ripley got quite graphically personal with a couple of fags, and why there was no warning prior to the start of the movie screen, about her sucking on them. :eek: I thought on-screen cigarette smoking was verboten these days ?

Nopes and there's a context. It's used as a device to help illustrate frustration and stress with the situation at hand. Also these things are different when not in a contemporary context. The same way it's ok for mad men to have them smoking constantly.

You're not going to give a crap about any of the characters, all the machinery type technology has been done before, and the whole "poor little persecuted communists must be able to strike back and win" shtick is too badly timed what with all the trouble, misery, and expense their ilk are busy trying to inflict upon the real and sane world at the moment re: AGW alarmism, Hopencagen, and all those corrupt commie pigs with noses in the trough in the U.N.

While the characters took a step back at times to the very pretty pandora, you do give a crap about them, the Na'vi and what they're fighting for. You understand Jake's journey as a beaten depressed man, escaping into a fantasy paradise world.

Meh to the industrial-military complex and the beauty of their weapons, and Meh to the minority fringe group ideologically driven scientific-technological elite-wannabees who side with the commies (just like we are seeing re: the fringe minority and 'consensus' driven colluding scientists whose corrupted science currently has the ear of the IPCC rather than the Real Science from many tens of thousands of scientists who say otherwise), and Meh to the blue-skinned creation worshipping marxist technology rejecting animists ... especially since it always leads to the same thing.

To be clear it's a private company with mercenaries. It has nothing to do with the IPCC or climate change, you are just blinded by your anti-environmental thoughts and ideologies to actually understand what is at play in the movie. The movie is not an analogy for global warming or anything. Yes it's pro environment, but that's not a bad thing you know.. strip mining forests, destroying the homes of the people who live there with no regard to their rights. The film is more in line to colonisation of the america's, africa, india, australia ect. Where those coming in had no regard for the native "savages" and just wanted profit.

So you're against the fact that the native's are religious? As someone who themselves uses religion to pick and chose what to believe about the world around them, that is rather odd. Or is it the simple fact that you take offence to these primitive beings relying so much of religion and ritual, or that they aren't the right religion?

What about the Na'vi is technologically rejecting??? They were against more advanced people destroying their homes and their way of life. Were the humans in independence day, "technology rejecting" because they didn't like more advanced technology destroying them?

In fact the Nav'i enjoyed a lot of technology, just not up to modern standards. They were a primitive people and it's that kind of attitude towards them, that is what the films message and references to the history of the human race that the film was talking about. It's a shame that you're too blinded by these to understand these subtleties and how they relate to your own world outlook.

Just because people are less advanced, don't believe in what you believe in, doesn't make them sub human. Even if they aren't human. They still deserve to be treated as such, and not used, abused, killed and murdered.

I fail to see how an anti genocide, anti racism message is bad.

Revolution, War and Bloodshed.

Meh, Meh, and Meh.
All things that make for good films!




Anyhoo, can hardly wait to take numba1son to see it so we can explore the whole lefty politics of dancing and envy it provides, as well as have a laugh together at the New Agey tree-hugging "every living thing is a part of god" anti-Judeo-Christian religion it is pushing.

How is the film anti-judeo-Christian? Once again I think you're reading things in and blinded by your own issues to understand the film. There was nothing of the sort. Except the people weren't christians. The who Aywa thing, was specific to that planet. Yes there was an underlying environmental mother earth vibe to it, the film did not take place on earth. Nor did it claim pandora was like earth.

Pandora was special. On Pandora, plant life had electrical properties and so the forrest worked like a giant organism. All in tune, with the plants acting like neurons, all interconnected to form some sort of network of nature interconnected. The planet itself acted as one joint eco-system, and just because the Na'vi being primitive people worshipped the planet because of some of the results of this, is not anti-Christian.
The film was science fiction and the idea of a planet with the plants being interconnected to form some kind of intelligence is nothing new.

How ever the film does not take place on earth. It's an alien world. I kind of think actually having the thing is a big of a heavy handed approach, but it's an old sci-fi idea and makes the planet and it's life more alien and different to here ON EARTH.


Then we'll prolly get the xbox 360 game of the movie and team up to blow up some virtual renewable resources while flying cool looking but no doubt realistically inefficent helicopters. :)

I was curious about the game, but it's not meant to be that great. Meant to be ok though, might be fine for the causal gamer though.
 
Last edited:
Moon.
A fine, and really really sad, little sci fi movie.
You can't say much about it at all without giving it all away.

Yeah it is. Very underrated.
Unfortunately I read a spoiler. I would have figured things out pretty quickly but grrrr.

I also saw District 9 recently. Also a very good, and a little sad sci-fi film (if you can stomach the violence).
 
Before Sunset
Agh I loved it so much! I love how realistically this displays the complexities of their relationship. It virtually comes down to idealism vs reality; two ideologies that seemingly cannot co-exist in their lives. Their relationship is a very fascinating one. The ending is ambiguous to an extent, but I do believe it suggests that their relationship definitely isn't over. I really hope they make a third film down the line.

The dialogue throughout the film is fantastic too. Their thoughts, beliefs and general neuroticism remind me of me. Also, this film also takes place in real time.. the narrative only spans 76 minutes or so which is quite unique.

I think I prefer Before Sunrise, but that may be because the characters were at a similar age to me and shared similar lifestyles, aspirations, etc. I'll probably appreciate Sunset even more as I grow older.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Away We Go - with John Krasinski, tall guy fromt he US Office show, the normal one in love with Pam, I really like him but this movie is boring, my movie watching friend quite liked it, I thought it was utterly pointless and dull. You might like it if you are a bit lost and in your early 30s.

Going to see Avatar tonight or tomorrow, that world looks so pretty - but oh hell Cameron can't you make a movie in under 3 hrs?
No wonder it's not really setting the box office on fire - just before Christmas who really has 3 hrs to spare, yeah actually maybe I will wait for one of my days off.
 
Watched Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince tonight...

eh much like my feelings of the last film.. nothing much happened.. less in this than the last.. gone is the sense of wonder and excitement. All just kind of underdeveloped, dull miner story bridging points for the main story, containing basically no plot of it's own. At least the last film which was in a similar vein had more going on.What a shame.
 
Saw Avatar 3d, and it was a very pretty escapist movie, I really enjoyed it, Sam is very good.

They are a bit like elves.

He totally ripped off the flying dragon thing from Harry Potter and the Griffen flying thing.

And he has freakin Celine Dion warbling again.

But allround it's a captivating experience in 3d, I had great fun watching this.
 
GI Joe

Was an entertaining fun, over the top action film. It did it's job well, not much else to say really. Oh yes there is... I always rated Sienna Miller as one of the best looking actresses around.... **** she was stunning in this...
 
I'm watching Bladerunner, "the final cut" on Bluray. After years of seeing it on TV or VHS, it's great to see it so sharp and crisp. This version doesn't have the VoiceOver and has little extra moments added. The final directors cut, which feels odd when you've seen a movie so many times you could almost recite the dialog line for line.
 
I'm watching Bladerunner, "the final cut"

Good stuff isn't it. Especially when you read online about all the politics, sulks, and strife behind the making of the different versions (a bit like wih Dune). I've got a triple box set which has a whole bunch of different versions and I know what you mean re: expecting a certain thing to happen or be said or certain music and IT DOESN'T HAPPEN and for a moment you're left wondering if you've gone mad or imagined the version you remember. :)

On ABC iView (online ABC) there is a 2parter "Red Dwarf" xmas special which has borrowed muchly from the Bladerunner script/cannon, so if you like Bladerunner AND Red Dwarf, it is bound to be a merry hoot for ya.

Latest movie I saw was "Sherlock" with LSCP and numba1son ... we got back from seeing it at Midland ACE Cinema (cheers ACE for the cheap tickets thanks to our renewed ACECARD membership that has already paid for itself)

Verdict ?

Very satisfying ... and it leaves "AVATAR" for dead.

I hope most of the same cast are used for needful sequels.

regarDS
 
Robert Downey Jnr is always fun. I want to see that too.
A prime example that booze and drugs might be bad for your health, but they make for a very interesting actor.
 
I'm watching Bladerunner, "the final cut" on Bluray. After years of seeing it on TV or VHS, it's great to see it so sharp and crisp. This version doesn't have the VoiceOver and has little extra moments added. The final directors cut, which feels odd when you've seen a movie so many times you could almost recite the dialog line for line.



I've always had an odd relationship with the film blade runner. I have only seen it a few times over the years and never really liked it until I saw the final cut... just to show off, i got to see it in a premier in a cinema and meet Rutger Hauer on the red carpet before hand...

Quite a few years before that after watching the directors cut on dvd, i was out for dinner with a good friend of mine and she had studied the film in cinema studies. So she knew a lot of the ins and outs. So had a fair bit of interesting discussion and the thing i got away from it was, between the original and directors, you needed to have seen both films, neither was complete. Things like in the original about the unicorn dream, then in the directors cut, they removed the mention, but then added the dream so it was out of context. It always bugged me that the films were not completely accessible with out this kind of extra knowledge.

After the final cut, while it had been quite a few years, I did leave the cinema having really enjoyed the film, so I don't know if it was just because it was such a better cut of the film, or just the extra insight added more.
 
Back
Top