Skip to main content

THE VIRUS 2020 - the good, the bad, and the ugly

Drama said:
Newspapers where Murdoch is the most dominant is not the easiest way to consume media. You have to buy it or have a subscription.
Click to expand...
Would think in general most people don’t realise who is behind when buying the normal daily paper or buying “The Australian”.

They think it’s the news. It’s hard not to be influence by them.

People see what’s printed in newspapers as the truth.
 
Columbo said:
You don't for news.com.au
Click to expand...
whether you do or don't for that website is irrelevant to the point. There's a lot more competition for Murdoch online. I'm specifically talking about newspapers where he dominates in Australia. Again your reading comprehension doesn't seem right today!
 
It’s Not said:
Would think in general most people don’t realise who is behind when buying the normal daily paper or buying “The Australian”.

They think it’s the news. It’s hard not to be influence by them.

People see what’s printed in newspapers as the truth.
Click to expand...
You could say the same about any newspaper so singling out a Murdoch one doesn't really make sense. Not seeing much basis behind your argument.
 
Drama said:
whether you do or don't for that website is irrelevant to the point. There's a lot more competition for Murdoch online. I'm specifically talking about newspapers where he dominates in Australia. Again your reading comprehension doesn't seem right today!
Click to expand...

My reading comprehension is fine, inirama
 
I would not think many people are paying for thier newspaper no matter which bias it has. and that is because the quality of journalism over the last couple of decades does not warrent paying for it anymore. When the source of half the articles is trolling through social media feeds then who wants to pay for that? I would happily pay for quality, unbiased, just the facts reporting, but I am yet to find that.
 
Isee said:
I would not think many people are paying for thier newspaper no matter which bias it has. and that is because the quality of journalism over the last couple of decades does not warrent paying for it anymore. When the source of half the articles is trolling through social media feeds then who wants to pay for that? I would happily pay or quality, unbiased, just the facts reporting, but I am yet to find that.
Click to expand...
very reasonable view unlike some of our posters here that put it all on Murdoch or the right-wing media. Like I said earlier I don't think there's any source out there that is 100% objective.
 
Drama said:
Aren't you over 30 years old? It's time to grow up and get a job. And yes I should be concerned if my taxes are supporting people who can work but chose to spend their time trolling others on an internet forum.
Click to expand...

Lol, you're the one trolling, young drama. Anyway your insults just roll off my back.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top