• Welcome to the discussion forums. To get posting, register an account. You can also register with your Facebook or Twitter login.

THE COUCH - TV Chat Thread

Affable

Well-Known Member
Shame on those who voted for themselves. Affable. Why give yourself troll votes and steal it from reepbot?
I personally thought sav was a troll. I dont believe for one minute one indivudual can have such a phd in ratings.
If Im wrong sav, I apologise. Where can I study ratings in a tertiary sense?
I also believe that sav is a troll and I am surprised that he didn't even get a vote. Also was highly surprised he nearly won member of the year. What a farcical. 😆

I didn't vote for myself at all when I voted. Pretty sure sav handed me the award.
 

timmydownawell

100% Free. Apply now!
Awesome site donor
That's correct but I did some calculations the other day. Pretty sure there was 65 votes in it.

Me - 21 votes
reepbot - 20 votes
Tim - 7 votes
Kingston - 5 votes
Blobby - 4 votes
Gayspie - 4 votes
kxk - 2 votes
oddjob - 2 votes

Percentages all work out accurately if that was the vote count.
No, One vote = 2.78% but the numbers get rounded:

Me - 12 votes 33.33%
reepbot - 11 votes 30.56%
Tim - 4 votes 11.11%
Kingston - 3 votes 8.33%
Blobby - 2 votes 5.56%
Gayspie - 2 votes 5.56%
kxk - 1 votes 2.78%
oddjob - 1 votes 2.78%
 

Fuzz

Well-Known Member
Dont be anti-sav. He has provided much needed info regarding ratings which plebs such as myself have no clue.
And sav is one of the brave ones to have the fortitude of actually boldly liking some of my silly posts.
 

Affable

Well-Known Member
No, One vote = 2.78% but the numbers get rounded:

Me - 12 votes 33.33%
reepbot - 11 votes 30.56%
Tim - 4 votes 11.11%
Kingston - 3 votes 8.33%
Blobby - 2 votes 5.56%
Gayspie - 2 votes 5.56%
kxk - 1 votes 2.78%
oddjob - 1 votes 2.78%
Hmmm. Well I've heard from people that voted from some of the lower ones and compared to how I voted, those low numbers are not possible.

So I still believe there were 65 votes.
 

timmydownawell

100% Free. Apply now!
Awesome site donor
Hmmm. Well I've heard from people that voted from some of the lower ones and compared to how I voted, those low numbers are not possible.

So I still believe there were 65 votes.
Well how is it that nobody scored less than 3%? My numbers work out perfectly. Would you like a graph?

Also wondering if all the people who scored 3% for Member of the Year also voted for themself?
 

Affable

Well-Known Member
But my graphs...
Me - 21 votes (0.32307692307 = 32%)
reepbot - 20 votes (0.30769230769 = 31%)
Tim - 7 votes (0.10769230769 = 11%)
Kingston - 5 votes (0.07692307692 = 8%)
Blobby - 4 votes (0.06153846153 = 6%)
Gayspie - 4 votes (0.06153846153 = 6%)
kxk - 2 votes (0.03076923076 = 3%)
oddjob - 2 votes (0.03076923076= 3%)
 

Affable

Well-Known Member
No, One vote = 2.78% but the numbers get rounded:

Me - 12 votes 33.33%
reepbot - 11 votes 30.56%
Tim - 4 votes 11.11%
Kingston - 3 votes 8.33%
Blobby - 2 votes 5.56%
Gayspie - 2 votes 5.56%
kxk - 1 votes 2.78%
oddjob - 1 votes 2.78%
Your numbers when rounded up/down = 101%. Not possible...
 

Affable

Well-Known Member
1​
2.78%​
1​
2.78%​
2​
5.56%​
2​
5.56%​
3​
8.33%​
4​
11.11%​
11​
30.56%​
12​
33.33%​
Round each of those up and down and then add them all together. Does not equal 100 but 101. So it's not possible.

There were more votes. You need to get that 33% closer to the 32 mark to get the true percentage of all the votes.
 
Top