Skip to main content

Jade 2013 Appreciation thread

Jade is very nice and very friendly person. How many crappy stuff has Tim done to her and she is still friends with him. She is definitely the bigger person.
 
Gemini said:
The one thing I did like was Jade saying he gave her some tips and gave her his dad's number because it shows that although Ed does ignore her on SM, they are communicating so it's not like Jade's trying to consistently interact with him on SM while he's trying to freeze her out (like I was fearing).
Click to expand...

True.

And, in terms of the people who may read that article, how many would know what Ed or Jade's SM behaviour is - or have read his blogvertisement to know that he said he has no Valentine this year? Also, as [MENTION=33321]delcan[/MENTION] pointed out, she was answering questions about Ed in an interview in his hometown - gotta sound positive about him
 
P.s. What the hell is up the title of that article???
Click to expand...

I thought it was a witty little pun regarding Jade's current relationship expectations between Ed and her. hehehe. :p Or was it aimed at her H&A aspirations?

*goes to hide under some rocks before I get bible stoned* :cool:
 
Connoisseur said:
I thought it was a witty little pun regarding Jade's current relationship expectations between Ed and her. hehehe. :p Or was it aimed at her H&A aspirations?

*goes to hide under some rocks before I get bible stoned* :cool:
Click to expand...

It's a play on Ed's name. Although not the bestest title ever, I agree.
 
Mooseface said:
It's a play on Ed's name. Although not the bestest title ever, I agree.
Click to expand...

Yes, I'm aware of that. That's why I suggested it was a witty little pun involving Jades and Ed's current 'ship status or lack thereof. Ed Lower ergo Jade Lowers her expectations. :cool:
Or it could been both a dig at her 'ship status and her ambitions to get an acting gig in a trashy Aussie soap, who knows?
 
Reaper said:
Hon, you are way too defensive this morn.

Have to give it to you all almost 10 posts before getting the article headline? Jade would be proud.
Click to expand...

Aw so you actually don't have any examples? Bummer. I was genuinely interested because you have the reputation of finding somewhat good info.
 
Gemini said:
Aw so you actually don't have any examples? Bummer. I was genuinely interested because you have the reputation of finding somewhat good info.
Click to expand...

Hon, plenty of examples throughout both threads, what happened in the house and being unceremoniously given the flick by Ed - like most in this thread even you would have to admit she is a bit of a clinger.

Besides if she wasn't a no sense harranger this thread wouldn't be so 'worried' tripping over itself about what's going to happen between her and Ed while she is in Melbourne. X
 
Reaper said:
Hon, plenty of examples throughout both threads, what happened in the house and being unceremoniously given the flick by Ed - like most in this thread even you would have to admit she is a bit of a clinger.

Besides if she wasn't a no sense harranger this thread wouldn't be so 'worried' tripping over itself about what's going to happen between her and Ed while she is in Melbourne. X
Click to expand...

So like us you're only going off a couple of social media interactions? Or doing some guess work based off in-house stuff from months ago? Even though we now know that Ed has been communicating her in private so if Jade says they're close and still good friends that's probably accurate.

We panic because we don't have any real info, and evidently neither do you in this instance.

Disappointing :(
 
I have no doubt that Jade spoke well of Ed, but I think it's partly the way the article is written, with her sentences broken up individually, that makes it seem like she brought him up repeatedly.

"We're still very close," she says. "I'm going to be seeing him in Melbourne next week" she says.
"It's nice to be in Adelaide where he's from and meeting some of his friends." ... "He sent me his dad's phone number in case I get lost so I've got someone to call," she laughs. "He also gave me some tips, some places to go, some restaurants to visit".

I imagine the actual conversation went like this...
Interviewer: So, Ed told us he planned to show you around Adelaide, but he's not here for this trip. Are you two still an item?

Jade: We're still very close. I'm going to be seeing him in Melbourne next week. It's nice to be in Adelaide where he's from and meeting some of his friends. He sent me his dad's phone number in case I get lost so I've got someone to call. He also gave me some tips, some places to go, some restaurants to visit.

End of topic. Not a clinger, just an answer to a question.

Having said that, I DO think she made a deliberate effort to portray them as remaining friends partly because so many people share the sentiments of Reaper (and reinforced by Tim's video), that she was "unceremoniously given the flick". To save face, she has to pretend that that's not what happened, that it just didn't work out but they are still friends. So, of course she's going to see him in Melbourne. And, of course his friends are making her welcome. They're friends, you know!

The problem, as I see it, is that Ed really isn't a good friend to her, at least publicly. As such, her vows of friendship come off as desperate and needy. She really just needs to cut him out of her life!
 
Jane Doe said:
Having said that, I DO think she made a deliberate effort to portray them as remaining friends partly because so many people share the sentiments of Reaper (and reinforced by Tim's video), that she was "unceremoniously given the flick". To save face, she has to pretend that that's not what happened, that it just didn't work out but they are still friends. So, of course she's going to see him in Melbourne. And, of course his friends are making her welcome. They're friends, you know!

The problem, as I see it, is that Ed really isn't a good friend to her, at least publicly. As such, her vows of friendship come off as desperate and needy. She really just needs to cut him out of her life!
Click to expand...

Nailed it. Like I said originally, Jade's comments on their own didn't bother me, but they did when put next to Ed's who's intent on ignoring her publicly and yelling "I'm single!" to anybody that will listen. Now if we didn't have any indication that they were interacting privately, based off nothing but SM interactions I'd be thinking "For God sake Jade. He's ignoring you. Get the hint". (This is where I have been at times recently).

However, now that we know he is communicating with her away from social media, and he's doing things like giving her Adelaide suggestions and his Dad's number, then I don't see why she shouldn't interact with him on SM. I'm more curious as to why Ed is happy to acknowledge her privately but feels the need to completely ignore her publicly. Talk about mixed signals regarding how they're allowed to interact.
 
Can someone who has twitter tell me if it is easy to unfollow someone? Maybe Jade unfollowing Ed was an error. Hence her refollowing him.
 
Willoughby said:
Can someone who has twitter tell me if it is easy to unfollow someone? Maybe Jade unfollowing Ed was an error. Hence her refollowing him.
Click to expand...

I don't think so given she un-followed him on Instagram as well. That would be way too much of a coincidence IMO if she accidentally un-followed him on both at the same time.
 
Gemini said:
I don't think so given she un-followed him on Instagram as well. That would be way too much of a coincidence IMO if she accidentally un-followed him on both at the same time.
Click to expand...
Ok thks, I thought they were linked so unfollowing one would affect the other. I know I accidentally send friend requests when I scroll Facebook pages on iPad - lol, embarrassing!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top