Skip to main content

In The News

kxk said:
Poor baby.

And just been reading about pygmy elephants - just 5 ft! That's almost pet size. Found in Indian and Malayasian forests.
Click to expand...

eliza said:
The elephant photo is heartbreaking. Idiots to the side of me took to all of their trees with a chainsaw while I was at work yesterday, by time I got home there were several massive branches in my yard with nests and or baby birds dead or injured it was like a battlefield. I knocked on their door and asked them to come around and sort it. (they did)

The wave photo is amazing/terrifying.
Click to expand...

Damn! I hate people! The human race is a damn curse! :mad:
 
eliza said:
Poor LSXPFDTNXZPC must hate being blamed for the dribble that comes out of her partners mouth and from his keyboard warrior sessions.
Click to expand...

No one is suggesting that the EMILY lister Fabian Socialist totalitarianism favouring wastrel and misandrist called Julia Gillard should be blamed for the dribble that comes out of her partner's mouth.

What is being suggested is that that particular misandrist should practice what she preaches. In short, she should honour her OWN words of "I’ve had enough. Australian women have had enough. When I see sexism and misogyny I’m going to call them for what they are.”

Could it be that your own misandry got in the way of realising that or was there really a unicorn over where you decided to point rather than honestly deal with the topic at hand ?

Anyhoo, here's the latest on the topic from here: http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/...ts/mathieson_must_pay_for_gillards_extremism/

The Australian is right. Tim Mathieson’s silly joke is only an issue because of the hypocrisy, cant and illiberalism of his partner, Prime Minister Julia Gillard:

WHILE his partner Julia Gillard might not thank him for it, the man affectionately known as the first bloke has done the nation a great favour. Tim Mathieson’s tasteless joke - complete with mildly racial and sexist undertones - has exposed the cant of the Prime Minister’s misogynist campaign against Tony Abbott, and even underlined the absurdity of the government’s proposal to further impinge on free speech through new anti-discrimination laws…

This time, if Mr Mathieson has generated political embarrassment for Ms Gillard, she should reflect on how she has brought this upon herself. Her confected outrage over misogyny, devised as a political attack against Mr Abbott, has helped to introduce an unreasonable new standard that few people could live up to. When the Prime Minister claimed to be “very offended” by a reference to housewives and ironing, and chastised the Opposition Leader for “now looking at his watch because apparently a woman’s spoken too long”, she helped create a “gotcha” environment that has now enveloped her partner. To make matters worse, her government is pursuing an extension of anti-discrimination laws that in many circumstances will criminalise words that “insult or offend”.
Click to expand...

Under those laws, Mathieson could be sued by people who merely took offence at his remarks about female Asian doctors. Two Asian callers to my 2GB show with Steve Price last night said they were indeed offended. Defamation lawyer Justin Quill confirmed this established a prima-facie case that Mathieson would then have to defend, with the onus now on him to prove innocence.

So the questions for Gillard are these: does she admit her proposed laws would make what Mathieson said potentially unlawful? Does she agree that this demonstrates her laws are dangerously broad?

How will she change them so that her boyfriend - and no other Australian - need not fear being dragged to court for saying something so harmless?

UPDATE

Mathieson sure knows how to enjoy the perks of his girlfriend’s office: http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/ne...a-car-park-drama/story-e6freuy9-1226564560816
Click to expand...

regarDS
 
Do we only have news.ltd in Australia now for newspapers?

I've been reading online that they are biased toward the liberal party.

But didn't the old fart Rupert say he doesn't influence the papers?

Of course that's all bullshit
 
Craig Thomson arrested: http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/index.php/heraldsun/comments/thomson_arrested/

I wonder if, prior to the annoucement of her latest promise (that she didn't bother to tell her own ministers of but instead told the greenazis and the abc), Gillard knew this was going to happen and it was part of the reason for her latest promise.

Of course she did and of course it is !

... and who would think that wasn't the case anyway ?

regarDS
 
Last edited:
It would seem that The Black Adder would be no fan of Nicola Roxon ...

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukn...-we-must-be-allowed-to-insult-each-other.html

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/j...3/rowan-atkinson-not-another-annoying-luvvie/

From the latter link, emphasis mine:

Atkinson, however, has always kept himself to himself and his political views private. This made his contribution all the more valuable when he did finally settle on a cause he considered worth championing: the ludicrous section of the Public Order Act outlawing "insult." This was a very bad and stupid law (as so many laws were from the Blair era) which resulted in such ridiculous cases as the Oxford undergraduate fined for calling a police horse "gay." But it certainly wasn't an obvious choice for a luvvie to campaign against.

First, it's about an issue which is complex and grown up and not – unlike say, climate change or "poverty" – an obvious sign that you really, like, care about stuff.

Second, it's not about banning stuff – which is what luvvies really like to do given half the chance because they're all basically in favour of more government – but about unbanning stuff, which is a much harder concept for your luvvie to deal with, involving as it does worrying issues like personal responsibility and freedom of choice.

So, well done, Rowan Atkinson. Mr Bean may be bloody irritating but you knew that already. The point is this: you're a star and a mensch.
Click to expand...

regarDS
 
mutleyp said:
View attachment 30774
Click to expand...

...this man is a total tosser... on average... when a man ejaculates during sex there are 375,000,000 sperm released... of all of them... he got through to the egg... my God... what were the rest of them like?... seriously... his parents should've had a cup of coffee instead IMO... he is a total waste of space... I'm glad that he lost... cheers.
 
Mr Stickyfingers said:
when a man ejaculates during sex there are 375,000,000 sperm released... of all of them... he got through to the egg... my God... what were the rest of them like?
Click to expand...

So, in your mind it is never the egg's fault but rather the sperm that gets into it ?

That it is never the egg carrier's fault but rather who or what she opened her legs to receive from ?

Anyhoo, your projection on that issue goes a long way towards explaining your user name. :D

regarDS
 
derspatz said:
So, in your mind it is never the egg's fault but rather the sperm that gets into it ?

That it is never the egg carrier's fault but rather who or what she opened her legs to receive from ?

Anyhoo, your projection on that issue goes a long way towards explaining your user name. :D

regarDS
Click to expand...


...lol derspatz!... if they had the coffee instead then neither of them would have been blamed for the outcome at the time!... besides... surely the female cannot be held accountable for receiving inferior goods at the time of conception... she can only nurture it and try to improve on it as it develops... can't she?... lol!... well that's my take on it at least...

...and as for... "that it is never the egg carrier's fault but rather who or what she opened her legs to receive from?"... well... it very well could've been her fault if copious amounts of alcohol was consumed and blurred her better judgement prior to the process... who knows?... lol!...

...as for my username... you're on the right track... a girlfriend that I had before I met my wife called me 'Mr Stickyfingers' because I seemed to have had a certain fascination with a particular part of her anatomy all those years ago... the name stayed with me there onwards... (as has the fascination)... when I had to find a user name on forums it seemed like a natural choice to make at the time...I used to just be called 'Stickyfingers'... but now I've aged a tad bit I added the 'Mr' to indicate my later years... cheers.
 
Mr Stickyfingers;1605538... said:
surely the female cannot be held accountable for receiving inferior goods at the time of conception...
Click to expand...

... and the proof you are offering of alleged "receiving of inferior goods" as opposed to "just fine goods having to deal with a bad egg" is ?

... a girlfriend that I had before I met my wife called me 'Mr Stickyfingers' because I seemed to have had a certain fascination with a particular part of her anatomy all those years ago... the name stayed with me there onwards... (as has the fascination)...
Click to expand...

It seems to me that lingering stickyness implies you were prone to blindly fumbling around using the wrong part of your anatomy and that both you and she would surely have been better served if the glossus rather than mere fingers had been used to attend to the fascinating area. IE, not only no mess aferwards but also all sensory organs brought in nice and close in order to feed the fascination.

That is, unless you were talking about her arse, in which case CHANGE YOUR DIRTY USERNAME NOW MR STINKYFINGERS ! :D

regarDS
 
derspatz said:
... and the proof you are offering of alleged "receiving of inferior goods" as opposed to "just fine goods having to deal with a bad egg" is ?
Click to expand...


...lolol!... no actual 'proof' offered Ders... just pure theory on my part... my logic may be a tad bit flawed to some but hey... it does it for me... besides my friend... all men are bastards and it's always the mans fault... you must know that... it's an unwritten law isn't it?...


It seems to me that lingering stickyness implies you were prone to blindly fumbling around using the wrong part of your anatomy and that both you and she would surely have been better served if the glossus rather than mere fingers had been used to attend to the fascinating area. IE, not only no mess aferwards but also all sensory organs brought in nice and close in order to feed the fascination.

That is, unless you were talking about her arse, in which case CHANGE YOUR DIRTY USERNAME NOW MR STINKYFINGERS ! :D

regarDS
Click to expand...



...hahahahahaha!... Mr Stinkyfingers!!!!... if it wasn't for the fact that I knew my way around a womans body so well... (even at that younger age)... then perhaps that could've easily been my name... in regards to my fumbling abilities... they were more like 'exploration runs' to get her into a 'happy mood' more than anything else...

...once she was 'happy'... well... hmmmm... I may leave it there...

...anyhow... no sense in charging in like a bull in a China shop... more fun to take your time and 'mosey' to enjoy the occasion methinks...

...in regards to the buttonhole... (things come out of it)... **shudder**... always strictly a 'no-go zone' for me my friend... **double shudder**... (I can't believe that I'm writing about this lol!)... moving on...

... I see that tosser Mundine and Sonny Bill Williams are facing possible legal action over comments they made on the social media after his defeat to Daniel Geale.

http://wwos.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=8603360

...I hope that they both get their arses whipped for their comments... there's nothing worse than sore losers crying that they 'wuz robbed'... I'm amazed that he didn't do the 'it's-because-I'm-black' thing... but then again... that's old fashioned now... nowadays it's because he was 'ambushed'... the tosser should just go away and disappear into oblivion... (that's never going to happen eh?)... this would've been a better result ... but alas... it didn't happen...

images.jpg

PS: Glossus... the answer to pleasure with your Glossus is on the tip of your tongue I believe... (someone had to say it lol!)... what a great word Ders... Glossus... sounds like a Roman Glad-he-ate-her... get it?... get it?... Gladiator... Glad-he-ate-her... **sigh**... why do I bother?... why oh why?... cheers.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top