Sandra's nomination for Travis was particularly weak. When you watch the footage of Travis talking about the soggy burger, it isn't that bad at all. It's not even worth a second thought.
She's one of the smartest housemates to enter that place in 14 years.
I am from Adelaide so supporting a south Aussie
But mainly would love to see a strong , smart, independent woman take out the title.
Standing behind Gemma when the entire house was such a mean place.oh I certainly don't have any dislike for her, just feel like I missed the part where she saved a babys life, or put out a factory fire with her bare hands, or turned water into wine (trust me, I would worship her if she could pull that one off).
This program should now be called a DRAMA.I can't believe that they are advertising to expose what really happened with Cat and Lawson tomorrow. So that was like something that happened last friday and they wont show it until this Thursday?? they should just show it all at once so everything is actually in chronological order. plus knowing what "really" happened may have more affect on Cat getting evicted. If you are going to chop and change what you show then its actually impacting who is evicted.
Not to mention that showing week old footage tomorrow means that whatever is happening today will get less air time tomorrow!!
What about them ?Those transexuals on that ACA promo for tomorrow tho.
Standing behind Gemma when the entire house was such a mean place.
When did this happen?????It sounded like Lawson said he didn’t care, and Cat responded with something like “at least I know how you really think”. Then Jason reported back to the staff “he told her!” …which I took to be that it was about their relationship...
It was very quick (and I need to watch it again to be sure), but given this I wasn’t too surprised that Cat didn’t check his place on the nominations board.
It's about to start here. One of the advantages of watching in Perth, you get forewarned on what happens.
There was definitely not a proper discussion about what had happened, I will agree with you there. Sam didn't handle the conversation with her at all well, so I won't even go there. I definitely think his actions were in the wrong.
What I was trying to point out that if she is the 'strong woman' she thinks she is she needs to learn to assert herself, because people will be inappropriate and awful to her throughout life (thats a given, it happens to everyone) and she will need to learn how to set boundaries to ensure that it doesn't happen like this again. As I have stated, when I was younger it did take a few situations like this for me to learn, but you have to reflect and see the situation as it is, and understand your part in it. That is what I felt she did in her conversations after when she said she realised she should have asserted herself and said no. That's why I didn't have a problem with those conversations.
In regards to Travis; adults deal with their situations entirely differently. If you were in a situation where a friend had done something mean to you, you would, as a mature adult, address the issue with that friend, when ready. Not have another friend or boyfriend do it for you (I realise she didnt want him to do it for her). He didn't go as macho as Sam made it out, agreed, but doing that is really immature. If my partner did that for me I would be embarassed and angry, as Aisha kind of was with Travis. This is not just a house thing, this is a life thing. It's what you do in school when you have been bullied, you tell mum or a teacher and they deal with it for you. As adults, you deal with your problems yourself. Personally, I see that action as seriously patronising.
When did this happen?????![]()
As equally weak as Travis's nomination for being given chocolate pancakes.
When did this happen?????It sounded like Lawson said he didn’t care, and Cat responded with something like “at least I know how you really think”. Then Jason reported back to the staff “he told her!” …which I took to be that it was about their relationship...
It was very quick (and I need to watch it again to be sure), but given this I wasn’t too surprised that Cat didn’t check his place on the nominations board.
I don't think that's how Travis meant it though? Look, I really haven't liked him much, too much meathead for me. But, he's not just about himself, and I have thought he was, he was upset for his friend and wanted to fix it for them.
i thought this was about lawson prompting cat to tell the staff what a good job they doing. he told her it be good idea and get in their good books if she did it. and jason was just commenting that lawson told her to do thatWhen did this happen?????![]()
Yes. But blokes tend to do, while women say it doesn't matter.I get that the intention is in the right place - not disagreeing with that at all. But even actions with the best intentions are ill fated. That's one of them. Listen to what she wants, calm down and wait. Don't think about what you would want, don't try to solve her problems. Sit and listen and support. He ended up making it a bigger drama than it needed to be, which is usually what happens when a third person is introduced to a 'two person' dispute.
Off I go to watch it again.When David was nominating Jason. It was an example he used to show why he nominsated him.