Columbo
Never again
I've always imagined @Witty Banter to be like Frasier Crane with this forum being the Cheers' pub.
Yes a bit more reading, far more articulate.Personally I think Canny Loopy is done with this forum. I honestly don't really see any resemblance between WB and Canny either in regards to how they choose/chose to conduct themselves as posters. Canny was unapologetically strident and got quite aggressive in dishing out his opinions on various subjects, a trait that ultimately rubbed posters that frequented this forum back then the wrong way.
WB is for a lack of a better word quirky and doesn't seem overly concern in engaging posters in topics such as politics, religion, etc.. to argue ad nauseam until they've seen the error of their ways. But you never know I suppose.
WB's main ax to grind was what he believed to be the hypocrisy of certain posters who in his opinion allowed Trala to get away with behaviour that he thought was not tolerated in other posters.
Yes a bit more reading, far more articulate.
Kudos for challenging the status quo WB.
I hope everyone kissed and made up, now!
Lol at asking conn for an explanation. He knows as much as you do. The rest is all his vivid imagination.
This is true but I enjoyed his observations.
You know that this whole deal blew up when hooley jokingly pondered whether WB and rb were the one and the same, right?
It's funny because only a few days prior Consuela had also in jest insinuated that rb and moi were the same person. But not a peep was heard from rb, he comfortably let it slide as did I as there's not substance in it.
However the instant hooley wondered the same thing a couple of days later about WB and rb the entire tone of both WB and rb posts became terse and defensive, with WB even claiming hooley was 'besmirching', something or other, his time in this forum. lulz Just food for thought, eh?
The plot thickens.You know that this whole deal blew up when hooley jokingly pondered whether WB and rb were the one and the same, right?
It's funny because only a few days prior Consuela had also in jest insinuated that rb and moi were the same person. But not a peep was heard from rb, he comfortably let it slide as did I as there's not substance in it.
However the instant hooley wondered the same thing a couple of days later about WB and rb the entire tone of both WB and rb posts became terse and defensive, with WB even claiming hooley was 'besmirching', something or other, his time in this forum. lulz Just food for thought, eh?
You know that this whole deal blew up when hooley jokingly pondered whether WB and rb were the one and the same, right?
It's funny because only a few days prior Consuela had also in jest insinuated that rb and moi were the same person. But not a peep was heard from rb, he comfortably let it slide as did I as there's not substance in it.
However the instant hooley wondered the same thing a couple of days later about WB and rb the entire tone of both WB and rb posts became terse and defensive, with WB even claiming hooley was 'besmirching', something or other, his time in this forum. lulz Just food for thought, eh?
The plot thickens.
Sorry, but stoking your six month undercover expose fail ran in parallelYou know that this whole deal blew up when hooley jokingly pondered whether WB and rb were the one and the same, right?
It's funny because only a few days prior Consuela had also in jest insinuated that rb and moi were the same person. But not a peep was heard from rb, he comfortably let it slide as did I as there's not substance in it.
However the instant hooley wondered the same thing a couple of days later about WB and rb the entire tone of both WB and rb posts became terse and defensive, with WB even claiming hooley was 'besmirching', something or other, his time in this forum. lulz Just food for thought, eh?
What the heck have I missed around here??
Ha ha, so much so, there are now some notable 'exemptions' from at least two threads.Everything and nothing.
Ha ha, so much so that there are now some notable 'exemptions' missing from at least two threads.
Given the subject of this thread, I would have thought you could work that out, Poirot. (But yours survived, I think).Which two threads are that?
Given the subject of this thread, I would have thought you could work that out, Poirot. (But yours survived, I think).
All hostilities are on hold for a Brady Bunch Movie ceasefire, at least until the part where Cindy collects the neighbour's mail and he says 'nup, not a word'.
I mean I'm incapable of being wrathful while the Brady Bunch Movie is on. Whichever that is most like, then.Ceasefire? You mean like a Korean war ceasfire or a Russian - Ukrainian ceasefire?