Ha you really don't want to engage me in an argument. bless youBelieve what? I believe that Travis is opinionated and haters are going to hate.
No matter what he does, you guys won't like him. I really don't care anymore though.
Ha you really don't want to engage me in an argument. bless youBelieve what? I believe that Travis is opinionated and haters are going to hate.
No matter what he does, you guys won't like him. I really don't care anymore though.
I really don't care anymore though.
Oh, just came in my mind, could it be the blatant editing?So true. They would all gang up and tell him to shut it. He'd spend the rest of the night apologising to this bunch of bullies.
I think Travis has a very blinkered view of life. He doesn't think outside the square, believes the world revolves around him, and sadly, is an asshat to boot.
Ha you really don't want to engage me in an argument. bless you
And that's why you switched your alliance to Lisa?![]()
Not ruling it out as an impossibility but we definitely have not seen anything of the like so far.Maybe. But I honestly feel he says things simply to be controversial or attention seeking. You know, the whole, "if you say black, I'll say white", thing.
omgGod bless you.... I am not looking to argue. Just speaking the truth. Take it or leave it.
Lisa is the most outspoken in there and is a worthy champion.
Love Lisa. Hopefully she ends up winning the show![]()
Although I don't completely agree with his statement regarding money, happiness and love, how is it arrogant or even wrong to state his opinion that they aren't defining happiness in the correct term?
I mean, this is if you're not being biased douches, exemplifying the negative trait you are crucifying someone for.
Maybe the girls unfairly told him to shut up and they eagerly wanted to have their say (the scene could've been gone for long), but BB decided to cut all that bit right until to the part where he says "it's my turn, let me finish"? I mean, who knows...
You're making it sound like he's acting as a fucking dictator.I believe the point people are trying to make (though I don't know why this needs to be spelt out) is: who is he to define the universal (or the house's) meaning of happiness, and refute other people's definition. You are defending his right to an "opinion" (or rather him forcefully imposing his misguided ideas on others) - he seems to be stripping others of it.
I believe the point people are trying to make (though I don't know why this needs to be spelt out) is: who is he to define the universal (or the house's) meaning of happiness, and refute other people's definition. You are defending his right to an "opinion" (or rather him forcefully imposing his misguided ideas on others) - he seems to be stripping others of it.
Don't they say "truth is a shade of grey". Meanwhile, Travis is a shade of poo brown.
JordanS, your love and devotion for all the housemates I hate gives me wings.Are you sure you're not Travis twin brother?
You're making it sound like he's acting as a fucking dictator.
He's not.
How is saying "I think you've defined happiness wrong" an act of "stripping others of" an opinion?
Seriously, this is so stupid.
Not at all.
If he's allowed to have this opinion, then viewers are entitled to feel that this comment was douchebaggery, by your logic. Everyone is entitled to their opinions, in your opinion, right?
And telling someone they're wrong isn't very respectful of their opinion, hence he is dismissing their right to vocalise their own definitions because it doesn't align with his. Once again, not sure why that needed to be spelt out.
Please point out where I have said, people are not entitled to their opinion of his "douchebaggery".Not at all.
If he's allowed to have this opinion, then viewers are entitled to feel that this comment was douchebaggery, by your logic. Everyone is entitled to their opinions, in your opinion, right?
And telling someone they're wrong isn't very respectful of their opinion, hence he is dismissing their right to vocalise their own definitions because it doesn't align with his. Once again, not sure why that needed to be spelt out.
I thought he was just expressing his own personal opinion. After all they were all discussing "what is happiness".
Please point out where I have said, people are not entitled to their opinion of his "douchebaggery".
Secondly, telling someone you believe they are wrong, is not disrespectful at all. Disagreeing with someone, because you believe they are wrong, is perfectly fine, if it is communicated respectfully and with maturity. The way he began the conversation was fine.
In fact, ending a sentence with "once again, not sure why that needed to be spelt out" is the perfect example of disagreeing with someones opinion and not being very respectful of their opinion.
A lot of conjecture.Instead of saying "I disagree" he was forcefully saying "youse guyz are all wrong." I think that's what people have the problem with. He wasn't willing to accept that others have a different opinion but expected everybody to agree with his definition of happiness.
Brings me back to my original point.That's the crux of it right there.
Much like your approach, it seems. Hence why I didn't feel an obligation to extend the niceties. My response was very much intended. Glass houses.
Brings me back to my original point.
People crucify the very actions they display.