If you added just one more ounce of hate into your ignorant heart I swear you would implode.
Your posts are quite simply overflowing with vitriol, generalisations, inaccuracies and mindless hate.
Howdy lahdeedah
By coinkydink (and, believe it or not, what follows is near to the first and certainly the most I've personally commented on the topic to date; I'm far more interested in music performance these daze
) here's a somewhat related comment added to mailing list post I chose to forward to my son this morning.
quoth-on
derspatz
09:39 (1 hour ago)
to ozltuae
First up, congrats on your latest win, henry
I've been forwarding some of this thread to my 24yo son and today I could no longer hold back on adding my own commentary on the topic, so this accompanied a forward of Mique's pointed posting.
"Mike weighs in. you woulda met him as a kid in canberra at the street side bbq and dac there as well and when visited us in york with val.
The scary thing for me re: the collectivist socialist leftwing biggov rightsrightsrights supporting hivemind
vs my kind of libertarian conservative individualism personalresponsibilitybeforerights centrism and mindownbusinessism is that to differ in view from the hivemind is to be deemed throwtothegroundandkicktodeath evil.
This is showing with hiveminders ( including dac ) calling for trump to be murdered whereas justice minded non loony lefty types are merely calling for the likes of clinton to have her obvious crimes examined in a court of law like any other person.
Anyhoo, is mostly the usual bigblobmadmob
vs individualism that always has been humanity''s bane i reckon. the mob need each other and give each other licence to do and be the worst and the individuals barely need anybody else, let alone the mad mob
regarDS"
Anyhoo++ one and all, do keep up both the good and bad work that'll help see the return of our Creator and Lord all the sooner to do away with n replace all the governments (etc) of humans and devils alike
Oh, and deem various analogies and references relating to the separation of wheat and chaff included, too.
Oh++, remember "be entertaining" ?
regarDS
DAC sez
>He's a guy's blog I read, he's young and full of hope about many things,
>and makes some excellent points:
>
>
http://waitbutwhy.com/2016/11/its-going-to-be-okay.html
>
>It's quite soppy about America being full of American's, but that's ok too.
>
>Dac
MIQUE sez
First sensible thing I've read in days if not years.
A few observations:
1. Nobody knows how Trump will perform as President, and the
pundits have been nothing but wrong in their opinions throughout this
entire election season. There's no reason to suggest that they'll be
any more accurate in predicting Trump's failure as President.
2. Liberals (US-style) have no sense of proportion. It is their most
common, greatest and most persistent fault. Everything/everyone they
oppose is unarguably evil, and vice versa. This trait is on display
in the flood of hysteria pouring out of the airwaves and the Internet.
3. People who voted for Obama because he's black, and for Clinton
because she's a woman, or for Trump because he's a white man simply
aren't qualified to have the franchise. There are essential traits
and desirable traits. Race and a person's sex are no better than
desirable, and very minor desirables at that.
4. Neither Trump nor Clinton were "suitable" candidates by any
"normal" measure (and I've said so from the outset). Trump, because
he has no experience in politics and is, on the surface at least, a
populist buffoon. But when has that been a fatal handicap for the US
Presidency? Every President who comes from the side other than our
own has filled that description perfectly, n'est pas? Clinton, let's
be honest, is the perfect mate for her despicable husband, and has
been working the system for her own and her family's ends since
Whitewater and beyond. Her performance as Secretary of State has been
one of incompetence and/or utter corruption. Whatever one feels about
the position of the US as leader of the western world, things are
immeasurably more unstable and dangerous to us all than they were
before her time, and have not been improved in any measurable way by
anything she has done. Her lies about Benghazi, to the public but
most significantly to the families of the four US people killed there,
are unforgiveable, and anyone who has voted for her despite those
multitude of adverse things is too stupid to be aware that they
happened, or too cynical to care.
5. That the situation described in the last para existed is not
the fault of either Clinton or Trump. It's the fault of the American
people who have continued to tolerate, until now, a corrupt and
irredeemable political system. One blogger, a former senior State
Department Foreign Service officer, has said that having officially
observed/supervised many elections in Third World countries, he could
not say that these or most other American elections in recent years
could withstand independent audit by disinterested expert authorities
such as those used by the UN in the Third World. People voted for
Trump despite his being confronted by a raft of more conventionally
credible, mainstream Republican candidates. Media hubris and
progressive hatreds aside, it's unlikely that all, or even most of
them are the ignorant fools they are made out to be. And even if they
are, who says that ignorant fools should not have a say in who governs
them? Progressives with no sense of proportion but boundless hubris,
that's who. On the other hand, Clinton's candidacy was a lay-down
misere, with only Bernie Sanders, a virtual unknown and hardly a
credible competitor for the Clinton machine. At the very best, she
was offering more of the same, and it was precisely that which the
electorate showed it was unwilling to tolerate.
6. For me, the most worrying feature of these elections has been
the willingness of the mainstream media and of a seemingly
overwhelming majority of journalists to throw professional ethics out
the window and to actively connive with their preferred side. The
media here are bad enough, as the weeping, gnashing of teeth, rending
of garments and the rain of sackcloth and ashes in the papers here
today confirm. That individual journalists, no matter their seniority
of lack of it, are allowed to spruik their personal political druthers
under their own byline is a retrograde step unless clearly segregated
as opinion, and how many do you know whose opinion is worth
reading/listening to? Allowing opinion to influence, indeed censor
news is unforgiveable.
7. Where to now? I don't think Trump will be allowed to get away
with anything which is the sole thing that makes me pleased that he
won the election. Even with a Republican Congress, he will be kept
under as tight a rein as possible if only in the instincts for the
self-preservation of Republican congress critters who will react to
the predictably hostile media campaigns likely to carry on where they
left off yesterday for the foreseeable. On the other hand, a
sycophantic media and a docile Congress would have handed Clinton the
keys to Fort Knox which, I'm sure, has been her aim since early
childhood.
Mique
quoth-off
Okay, back to learning jigs and reels on my mandolin
Oh, and deem "hatez gonna hate" included
regarDS