-
Welcome to the discussion forums. To get posting, register an account.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Survivor: Winners at War (Season 40)
- Thread starter Columbo
- Start date
starry
Well-Known Member
The edit seemed to make it very obvious Natalie was coming back, having 3 advantages in the return challenge was funny. Too many twists with the tokens and Extinction wasn't really very interesting. The main event at the end was the Tony v Sarah fire challenge, if one of them got to the end they were likely to win, but we'd known that for a while I suppose.
troynuncdicit
Active Member
I can't believe nobody ever noticed his spying. He deserved to win for getting away with the sheer ridiculousness of that.
And Boston Rob was right - Natalie - and everyone else except Sarah, deserved to lose for not even trying to get rid of Tony.
I thought Rob was particularly egregious last night, especially with his bizarre derision of Natalie... keeping Immunity? It’s just really unimaginative to expect her to mimic Chris Underwood’s game play for play, not to mention that this show makes a continual point to mock Erik for giving up Immunity in Micronesia.
Meglos
HAVE A NECTARINE, GONK
Interesting article if you want to know about their toilet conditions and the like,
Former ‘Survivor’ Contestants Talk Eating, Smelling, and, Um, Hygiene
Eight people who have survived at least a season on the show talked about some of the elements that don’t make the final cut, or can’t be perceived through a television screen
www.theringer.com
troynuncdicit
Active Member
I think it’s also worth noting that with all the talk about how dumb people were for letting Tony get to the end, there wasn’t even a chance to vote him out in the finale since he played his Idol at 6 and won Immunity at 5. The only option is for him to lose fire, and it’s a massive risk to put yourself in that situation.
And for all of Rob’s talk about how Natalie didn’t make the right decision to keep Immunity at 4 (which is such a stupid sentence to even type out), wasn’t his first lesson in the Island of the Idols premiere that you shouldn’t go into fire if you’re not confident you’ll win?
Point is, Rob’s just an ass.
And for all of Rob’s talk about how Natalie didn’t make the right decision to keep Immunity at 4 (which is such a stupid sentence to even type out), wasn’t his first lesson in the Island of the Idols premiere that you shouldn’t go into fire if you’re not confident you’ll win?
Point is, Rob’s just an ass.