You cannot pinpoint a single sentence or paragraph in the two posts you quote to substantiate your accusations so you simply revert to generalizations.
if you dont know why those posts are bigoted then i feel pity for you for being so ignorant.
Nobody has a problem with him. Everybody has a problem with you.
Interesting. Seems like someone might have been defending Dystopia a few weeks ago?
What is the "something wrong" you are talking about? Be specific. You said "reepbot said you partook in the behaviour and were rightfully banned" but yet a few weeks ago you appeared to be defending the behaviour from Dystopia that reepbot had a problem with.
Just seems inconsistent to me. What behaviour did I specifically partake in and why would you trust what reepbot says? You don't seem the type that would trust reepbot's judgement so it's a bit surprising coming from you!
the “something wrong” is the issue or drama that you are trying to make out of nothing. I stood by what Dystopia said to reepbot, absolutely.
I do not stand by derogatory islamophobic posts which reepbot said you both made. You were both banned for whatever reason so I am inclined to believe it.
I did not make and would not want to make any derogatory Islamophobic posts but if you want to believe reepbot then that's your choice. I don't consider reepbot to be reliable source. I can't speak for Dystopia. Some of what he said, I understand why people would be concerned about that and why it shouldn't be tolerated on a forum. But I can't control what other posters do.
I did not make and would not want to make any derogatory Islamophobic posts but if you want to believe reepbot then that's your choice. I don't consider reepbot to be reliable source. I can't speak for Dystopia. Some of what he said, I understand why people would be concerned about that and why it shouldn't be tolerated on a forum. But I can't control what other posters do.
True. He’s about as reliable as a flat tyre.
Well anyway, my view on the matter is irrelevant. If the moderator or moderators seem there is grounds enough for disciplinary action to be taken against a poster or posters than surely that is all the proof that is needed?