Skip to main content

Last movie you saw

I actually liked The Devil Wears Prada. Emily Blunt and Meryl Streep were fantastic in it.

The point of the movie is (in my opinion) to show how normal, even smart, girls can get sucked into this strange culture of the super-thin, super-fashionable. I dunno, I found it to be quite funny and intelligent. Nothing groundbreaking, but an entertaining and kinda-sorta thought provoking movie.
 
Transformers: Revenge Of The Fallen

The film really needed a much better structured script. The story premise was decent but the film was a mish mash of tones, and parts such as the army guys had such under developed roles. Ultimately the film didn't really end in a different place than the last one. It was just pumpped up, not taking the franchise along a story path.

I think the thing is, it's just ridiculous silly. There gets to a point where it's so silly it gets really entertaining and fun, and it's building to this and then the final act just drags on, and it loses the fun, the action just isn't as good as the first half and the whole section is really an incoherent mess. Surprising tame and not well structured action which is a let down from Bay. It's almost as if they just ran out of creative steam, and just wanted to put in some cool visuals around the pyramids.

I think you have to be prepared for it to be ridiculous, over the top in the humor and while the odd personalities of the robots is some what strange.. why'd a robot act like a retard?? If you can get over it, it's mainly popcorn fun, just drags on at the end, that it looses the fun the momentum had been building. I never expected to take the film seriously, and while the first one is just all round a much better film, story, character, direction wise, there is still fun with this one. The first one i personally just lapped up as perfectly executed popcorn, blockbuster entertainment. This one just is no where near as polished and well done to the perfection that made me really like the first film.

A thing to remember, this is a victim of the writers strike. That happened right when the script was to be written. The studio had a start date, pushing a head so Michael Bay knew the story and just worked and worked on the action and pre-production basically with out a script, with the writers only coming in to write the script and put it all together in a really short time before principle photography started. This does show in the film.



You can stop the review now or read to my nit picking rant. It is kind of spoilerish but not really. Also I say nit picking because thats what people will call it but it really isn't nit picking as it's about something so obviously and to the detriment of the film.

Now what also suffered from the end was the complete lack of real world geography. According to this film Petra is just in some mountains off to the side of the pyramids, not across the suez canal and the Sinai desert and the red sea, the 400 kms away it is in Jordan which doesnt share a land border with Egypt. Here it's a short drive.
Also apparently next to the border with Jordan is right next to the pyramids. This sort of ignorance was just bizarre. Having the soldiers fighting next to the pyramids and having the jordan army come in for back up was just odd. Why be so unrealistic and not just have the Egyptian army?
Also and this is spoiler, if they wanted to go to jordan and for pacing made it so close, why not use the teleporting?? get around this whole stupidity.

Then they insisted on sticking the pyramids in the background as much as possible during this scene with no regard to their orientation so you couldn't follow where things were or get a sense of the place. Sure it doesn't have to exactly match the area, i don't mind they shot stuff that's much further south in egypt as next to the pyramids, but the amount of liberties was just mind-numbingly astonishing!

Things such as shots of John Turturro and the transformers on Khafre's pyramid. It then cuts to an insert shot of John Turturro where you can see Khafre's pyramid untouched in the background.
And through out the whole act there were many similar shots with the pyramids untouched or jumping around on them. With each of the giza pyramids being distinctive looking, it was just an annoying detraction. These are the only landmarks to link the locations in this fantasy mix of Jordan and Egypt, would be nice to not have shots of people driving from the west when going to the east, and the constant mess of geography due to the only landmarks changing location and orientation.

It was just so poorly handled that it almost seemed like it had to be deliberate. A lot of time and effort goes into these and It really seemed that Bay decided, to **** with the real world or any of this making sense. To me this just kept taking me out of the scene, it bugged the hell out of me. If the action had been better with the military guys not just explosions and shit, it could have all worked. This whole section just shitted me, although there were some cool shit and i did still enjoy for the most part.
 
Transformers: Revenge Of The Fallen

The film really needed a much better structured script. The story premise was decent but the film was a mish mash of tones, and parts such as the army guys had such under developed roles. Ultimately the film didn't really end in a different place than the last one. It was just pumpped up, not taking the franchise along a story path.

I think the thing is, it's just ridiculous silly. There gets to a point where it's so silly it gets really entertaining and fun, and it's building to this and then the final act just drags on, and it loses the fun, the action just isn't as good as the first half and the whole section is really an incoherent mess. Surprising tame and not well structured action which is a let down from Bay. It's almost as if they just ran out of creative steam, and just wanted to put in some cool visuals around the pyramids.

I think you have to be prepared for it to be ridiculous, over the top in the humor and while the odd personalities of the robots is some what strange.. why'd a robot act like a retard?? If you can get over it, it's mainly popcorn fun, just drags on at the end, that it looses the fun the momentum had been building. I never expected to take the film seriously, and while the first one is just all round a much better film, story, character, direction wise, there is still fun with this one. The first one i personally just lapped up as perfectly executed popcorn, blockbuster entertainment. This one just is no where near as polished and well done to the perfection that made me really like the first film.

A thing to remember, this is a victim of the writers strike. That happened right when the script was to be written. The studio had a start date, pushing a head so Michael Bay knew the story and just worked and worked on the action and pre-production basically with out a script, with the writers only coming in to write the script and put it all together in a really short time before principle photography started. This does show in the film.



You can stop the review now or read to my nit picking rant. It is kind of spoilerish but not really. Also I say nit picking because thats what people will call it but it really isn't nit picking as it's about something so obviously and to the detriment of the film.

Now what also suffered from the end was the complete lack of real world geography. According to this film Petra is just in some mountains off to the side of the pyramids, not across the suez canal and the Sinai desert and the red sea, the 400 kms away it is in Jordan which doesnt share a land border with Egypt. Here it's a short drive.
Also apparently next to the border with Jordan is right next to the pyramids. This sort of ignorance was just bizarre. Having the soldiers fighting next to the pyramids and having the jordan army come in for back up was just odd. Why be so unrealistic and not just have the Egyptian army?
Also and this is spoiler, if they wanted to go to jordan and for pacing made it so close, why not use the teleporting?? get around this whole stupidity.

Then they insisted on sticking the pyramids in the background as much as possible during this scene with no regard to their orientation so you couldn't follow where things were or get a sense of the place. Sure it doesn't have to exactly match the area, i don't mind they shot stuff that's much further south in egypt as next to the pyramids, but the amount of liberties was just mind-numbingly astonishing!

Things such as shots of John Turturro and the transformers on Khafre's pyramid. It then cuts to an insert shot of John Turturro where you can see Khafre's pyramid untouched in the background.
And through out the whole act there were many similar shots with the pyramids untouched or jumping around on them. With each of the giza pyramids being distinctive looking, it was just an annoying detraction. These are the only landmarks to link the locations in this fantasy mix of Jordan and Egypt, would be nice to not have shots of people driving from the west when going to the east, and the constant mess of geography due to the only landmarks changing location and orientation.

It was just so poorly handled that it almost seemed like it had to be deliberate. A lot of time and effort goes into these and It really seemed that Bay decided, to **** with the real world or any of this making sense. To me this just kept taking me out of the scene, it bugged the hell out of me. If the action had been better with the military guys not just explosions and shit, it could have all worked. This whole section just shitted me, although there were some cool shit and i did still enjoy for the most part.



The cartoons were better written then this mess...

I was excited before but not after. It was like eating a meal that goes bad in your tummy. Tastes good going down but an hour later you vomit.
 
"Bad Taste" starring Peter Jackson (at least 2 roles) and mates and directed by Peter Jackson back when he was 25yo over 4 years and on a shoestring budget and no wages for anyone.

Didn't actually watch much of the movie with the sound on (but will later on) but if you hire out the director's version and it has the extra "Good taste made bad taste" documentary with it, then with hindsight, I reckon head for that first (with sound on :))

It will provide a look at Peter Jackson of "Lord of the Rings" fame in way you might not have imagined, along with how he developed his craft, including inventing his own "steady cam" for live action shots.

[edit] Even better than the doco, is the "slide show" which has Peter delivering in his own words a slide show of the filming process to an audience in Berlin.

Had to LOL at how he replicated the effects of "squibs" with rubber hoses !

Basic story shot over 4 years with mates is that aliens have taken over a little kiwi town and "the boys" have been called in by the government to investigate and solve the problem.

Peter plays "derick" as well as a farmer taken over by an alien, and even gets to fight himself.

Aliens, should ya ever try and take over our world, beware of Dericks ! :)

regarDS
 
Last edited:
I think I've seen Bad Taste, or at least parts of it. It was on late at night and I fell asleep :)

I finally watched Milk a couple of weeks back and loved it.
 
High Fidelity is one of my favourite movies. It's pretty much a perfect movie for a music addict with OCD like me :D
 
yea me too!! i cant beleive nobody made me watch it sooner.

i love when he puts his records in chronological order ( or something similar ) im like OMG I understand!! with my cd collection tho, everything connects to a part of me growing up so yea. omg omg i love it so much.
 
Escape from New York

Yeah it was ok, but not very exciting and fairly slow paced which was a shame. For a film that's meant to be a classic, it actually was faily bland and boring. Some interesting ideas and concepts but compared to todays standards really fell flat. Even by standards back then It must have. Not much action, not real suspense or anything.
 
Escape from New York

Yeah it was ok, but not very exciting and fairly slow paced which was a shame. For a film that's meant to be a classic, it actually was faily bland and boring. Some interesting ideas and concepts but compared to todays standards really fell flat. Even by standards back then It must have. Not much action, not real suspense or anything.


Ssssnnnaaaaaaaaaaaake Pliskin
 
He just wasn't that cool or charming. The film kept telling you he was.

I saw the Escape from LA one back in the late 90s, it was full on comedy almost, so over the top b-movie stuff, he was much cooler in that even though it was a shitty movie.


If you want more B movie fun Snakes On A Train... It was cheap, it was nasty, but it was fun.
 
If you want more B movie fun Snakes On A Train... It was cheap, it was nasty, but it was fun.

God you watch some crap!

Anyone seen the Feast movies? They are so good! Well the 1st one I loved, the 2nd one was a bit tacky but still hilarious and I am going to watch the 3rd one soon!

poster_FEAST_1sht_July26_pdf2.jpg


feast2.jpg


B001KKU9CS.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg


Honey Pie is awesome in it!

Feast_2_8.jpg
 
Last edited:
God you watch some crap!

Anyone seen the Feast movies? They are so good! Well the 1st one I loved, the 2nd one was a bit tacky but still hilarious and I am going to watch the 3rd one soon!

poster_FEAST_1sht_July26_pdf2.jpg


feast2.jpg


B001KKU9CS.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg


Honey Pie is awesome in it!

Feast_2_8.jpg



Yep for the very same reason you watch Feast.....It's funny and B movies totally rule
 
Haven't actually watched this lately, but I just ordered Sid and Nancy on DVD. I always loved this film and Gary Oldman is so good in it. He's definitely one of my favourite actors, he inhabits Sid Vicious completely.
 
I have Sid and Nancy too. I love that movie, agreed that Gary Oldman is amazing in it!
 
Yeah, he's brilliant. He's such an awesome actor and hasn't really been formally recognized for it. Damn you academy!

I also bought Run Fatboy Run. Sure, it's a cheesy sort of typical rom-com which I'm generally not a fan of but Simon Pegg rules at life and David Schwimmer is awesome too.
 
Movie related news...

It would seem Megan Fox has ticked off film director Michael Bay

http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/movies/a162632/bay-hits-back-at-megan-fox-criticisms.html

Bay hits back at Megan Fox criticisms

Michael Bay has hit back at Megan Fox's claims that his movies do not offer many acting opportunities.

Speaking to the Wall Street Journal, the Transformers director took issue with Fox's remarks, saying that the actress is prone to saying "ridiculous things".

"Well, that's Megan Fox for you. She says some very ridiculous things because she's 23 years old and she still has a lot of growing to do," Bay said. "You roll your eyes when you see statements like that and think, 'Okay Megan, you can do whatever you want. I got it'. I 100% disagree with her."

Bay noted that his movies have helped to launch the careers of several top Hollywood stars.

"Nic Cage wasn't a big actor when I cast him [in The Rock], nor was Ben Affleck before I put him in Armageddon," he said. "Shia LaBeouf wasn't a big movie star before he did Transformers - and then he exploded. Not to mention Will Smith and Martin Lawrence from Bad Boys."

He continued: "Nobody in the world knew about Megan Fox until I found her and put her in Transformers. I like to think that I've had some luck in building actors' careers with my films."

I'd love to know what she actually said to or about him?
 
Back
Top