10,000 year old trees uncovered by storm on Isle of Man:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-isle-of-man-26357538
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-isle-of-man-26357538
So - if like me you have puzzled over why the vanishing plane had not a single mobile phone SOS call, should surely have been heaps of buzzing phones???
We heard what happened on 9/11 doomed planes, and others.
See here for explanations,
http://www.news.com.au/travel/trave...865?from=google_rss&google_editors_picks=true
Excerpt:
Compared to those four planes, which were travelling on low trajectories towards their targets, flight MH370 was flying extremely high. Military radar showed the Malaysian Airlines plane climbing to 45,000 feet just after turning west, before dropping to about 23,000 feet.
I don't know - suicide seems such a solitary and lonely business, doesn't compute with me to take planeload of people with you.
You would have to be utterly psychotic
What a shitty thing to do - and they suspect there have been previous suicides by pilots, is that a whole new category of mental illness????
I was wrong to make fun of the kind-hearted and caring people at their little anti-Abbott hate rallies last week. I understand now, thanks to the ABC, that I “misrepresented the nature of the marches by focussing on offensive signs without placing these in the broader context of a peaceful rally with many inoffensive signs.”
The ABC, by contrast, carefully and extremely fairly removed any offensive signs from its March in March coverage. The ABC even managed to avoid showing a sign bearing the words “F**K TONY F**K DEMOCRACY”, which was something of an effort, considering that the sign was so large it spanned a Melbourne street and needed a dozen or so people to carry it.
I was also wrong to dismiss the March in March movement as inconsequential. This is because I hadn’t realised the rules had changed, and that last September’s election can now be overruled by some shouty people whose total number amounts to only around one-tenth of Brisbane council’s electorate.
The only proper response, obviously, is for the forces of civilisation to conduct an even larger demonstration – without the obscene signs, Socialist Alliance t-shirts and dopey chants. This will be a demonstration of solid Australian values, supporting democracy, order, good manners, application and ambition.
I propose that we hold just such a demonstration this very week. Despite minimal time for organisation, this could be the largest demonstration in Australian history. For that matter, it might turn out to be one of the largest demonstrations ever held on earth.
Forget March in March. This counter demonstration is called Work on Wednesday. Here’s how you can participate in the greatest display of collective Australian solidarity witnessed since settlement:
• This Wednesday, the 26th of March, proudly and defiantly take to the streets and go to your place of employment.
• Put in a hard day’s work, earning money for yourself and your family.
• When the demonstration is over, after perhaps eight hours or so, again take to the streets and return home.
It’s a lot to ask, I know, but your Work on Wednesday sacrifice will really send a powerful message to the ABC and others about community values, inclusiveness and diversity.
Unlike March in March, Work on Wednesday has no central authority or ridiculous committees or sub-committees to boss you around. Participants are encouraged to demonstrate as individuals, taking whatever course of action they choose to show their support for Australia.
Also unlike March in March, which closed down streets, diverted police attention and otherwise interfered with things, Work on Wednesday will actually produce substantial economic gains. With a potential 11,502,200 participants, expert financial analysis predicts a boost to the economy of several billion dollars. Work on Wednesday could well be Australia’s first grassroots activist project to produce a profit.
Of course, there are some – the elderly, the infirm and Tasmania – who will be unable or unwilling to take part in Work on Wednesday. That’s fine. Protesting isn’t for everyone, and we make no judgments against lazy, shiftless types who decide against joining the movement.
For the rest of us, Work on Wednesday will be a wonderful, history-making day of spontaneous interactive awareness-raising. From the very first nightshift workers in Sydney to Adelaide’s busy crime scene investigators and all the way across the nation to the industrious west coast, Work on Wednesday provides the opportunity for nearly everybody to show their concern for our shared future.
Work on Wednesday is committed to building a better community for all Australians, and is therefore open to every one of us. Even Greens voters are welcome, if they can find someone who’ll give them a job.
Social media is important these days, according to social media, so Work on Wednesday has its own Twitter feed where regular updates and progress reports will be posted throughout the big day. Everyone who joins in is invited to send photographs of their Work on Wednesday activities to my blog. Email me at [email protected].
Let’s show those howling misfits at March in March how to conduct a real demonstration, with a positive message, a huge attendance and a brilliant outcome. Work on Wednesday! If it succeeds, we might have to do it all over again next week.
Tim Blair
Monday, March 24, 2014 (3:50am)
It just goes to show you that sometimes, consensus in science amounts to a “whole lot of nothing” as this story from Robert Mendick in The Sunday Telegraph tells us.
Growing crops to make “green” biofuel harms the environment and drives up food prices, IPCC admits in dramatic U-turn
The United Nations will officially warn that growing crops to make “green” biofuel harms the environment and drives up food prices, The Telegraph can disclose.
A leaked draft of a UN report condemns the widespread use of biofuels made from crops as a replacement for petrol and diesel. It says that biofuels, rather than combating the effects of global warming, could make them worse.
The draft report represents a dramatic about-turn for the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).
Its previous assessment on climate change, in 2007, was widely condemned by environmentalists for giving the green light to large-scale biofuel production. The latest report instead puts pressure on world leaders to scrap policies promoting the use of biofuel for transport.
The summary for policymakers states: “Increasing bioenergy crop cultivation poses risks to ecosystems and biodiversity.”
Breaking news: 18c to be repealed
Posted on 1:59 pm, March 25, 2014 by Sinclair Davidson
The Government Party Room this morning approved reforms to the Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (the Act), which will strengthen the Act’sprotections against racism, while at the same time removing provisions which unreasonably limit freedom of speech.
The legislation will repeal section 18C of the Act, as well as sections 18B, 18D, and 18E.
A new section will be inserted into the Act which will preserve the existing protection against intimidation and create a new protection from racial vilification. This will be the first time that racial vilification is proscribed in Commonwealth legislation sending a clear message that it is unacceptable in the Australian community.
Source.
Here is what we’ll be getting:
Freedom of speech (Repeal of S. 18C) Bill 2014
The Racial Discrimination Act 1975 is amended as follows:
1. Section 18C is repealed.
2. Sections 18B, 18D and 18E are also repealed.
3. The following section is inserted:
1. “ It is unlawful for a person to do an act, otherwise than in private, if:
a. the act is reasonably likely:
i. to vilify another person or a group of persons; or
ii. to intimidate another person or a group of persons,
and
b. the act is done because of the race, colour or national or ethnic origin of that person or that group of persons.
2. For the purposes of this section:
a. vilify means to incite hatred against a person or a group of persons;
b. intimidate means to cause fear of physical harm:
1. to a person; or
2. to the property of a person; or
3. to the members of a group of persons.
3. Whether an act is reasonably likely to have the effect specified in sub-section (1)(a) is to be determined by the standards of an ordinary reasonable member of the Australian community, not by the standards of any particular group within the Australian community.
4. This section does not apply to words, sounds, images or writing spoken, broadcast, published or otherwise communicated in the course of participating in the public discussion of any political, social, cultural, religious, artistic, academic or scientific matter.”
I think the political left will be in shell-shock. In one sense this is hardly surprising – for decades they have been on the rampage with little more than a whimper of protest from the right. On the other hand, they completely ‘misunderestimated’ anger on this issue – as Nick Cater explained last week.
They underestimate how deeply Abbott and others of a classical liberal persuasion are offended by the perverse consequences of 18C.
They underestimate the chilling effect the act’s provisions have on those who hold the freedom of expression as a non-negotiable element of a liberal society.
And they underestimate the personal affront Abbott took to the prosecution of Bolt.
What remains is now largely redundant legislation as inciting violence is already a crime.
Tis a good start but needs to go much much further ...
The only "race" we are all members of is "the human race" ...
What is more, I'm an Indabludivijiel
Aren't you, too ?
(now try and get THAT one out of your head before bedtime !)
regarDS
Australia's largest Holocaust denial group expressed support in Tony Abbott's initative to reduce and weaken the laws defining hate crimes, according to a Saturday report in the Australian daily the Sydney Morning Herald.