Skip to main content

In The News

What's that in the sky ?

Transit of Venus turns out to be something utterly unexpected !

Here is the beginning of the celestial event

venus3a.jpg

... and here is how it looked a couple of hours later !

smiley.jpg

Shocked scientists were heard to comment that "well, at least the sun doesn't appear to be cross with us at the moment"

:D

regarDS
 
'If you don't take a job as a prostitute, we can stop your benefits'


A 25-year-old waitress who turned down a job providing "sexual services'' at a brothel in Berlin faces possible cuts to her unemployment benefit under laws introduced this year.

Prostitution was legalised in Germany just over two years ago and brothel owners – who must pay tax and employee health insurance – were granted access to official databases of jobseekers.

The waitress, an unemployed information technology professional, had said that she was willing to work in a bar at night and had worked in a cafe.

She received a letter from the job centre telling her that an employer was interested in her "profile'' and that she should ring them. Only on doing so did the woman, who has not been identified for legal reasons, realise that she was calling a brothel.

Under Germany's welfare reforms, any woman under 55 who has been out of work for more than a year can be forced to take an available job – including in the sex industry – or lose her unemployment benefit. Last month German unemployment rose for the 11th consecutive month to 4.5 million, taking the number out of work to its highest since reunification in 1990.

The government had considered making brothels an exception on moral grounds, but decided that it would be too difficult to distinguish them from bars. As a result, job centres must treat employers looking for a prostitute in the same way as those looking for a dental nurse.

When the waitress looked into suing the job centre, she found out that it had not broken the law. Job centres that refuse to penalise people who turn down a job by cutting their benefits face legal action from the potential employer.

"There is now nothing in the law to stop women from being sent into the sex industry," said Merchthild Garweg, a lawyer from Hamburg who specialises in such cases. "The new regulations say that working in the sex industry is not immoral any more, and so jobs cannot be turned down without a risk to benefits."

Miss Garweg said that women who had worked in call centres had been offered jobs on telephone sex lines. At one job centre in the city of Gotha, a 23-year-old woman was told that she had to attend an interview as a "nude model", and should report back on the meeting.

Employers in the sex industry can also advertise in job centres, a move that came into force this month. A job centre that refuses to accept the advertisement can be sued.

Tatiana Ulyanova, who owns a brothel in central Berlin, has been searching the online database of her local job centre for recruits.

"Why shouldn't I look for employees through the job centre when I pay my taxes just like anybody else?" said Miss Ulyanova.

Ulrich Kueperkoch wanted to open a brothel in Goerlitz, in former East Germany, but his local job centre withdrew his advertisement for 12 prostitutes, saying it would be impossible to find them.

Mr Kueperkoch said that he was confident of demand for a brothel in the area and planned to take a claim for compensation to the highest court. Prostitution was legalised in Germany in 2002 because the government believed that this would help to combat trafficking in women and cut links to organised crime.

Miss Garweg believes that pressure on job centres to meet employment targets will soon result in them using their powers to cut the benefits of women who refuse jobs providing sexual services.

"They are already prepared to push women into jobs related to sexual services, but which don't count as prostitution,'' she said.

"Now that prostitution is no longer considered by the law to be immoral, there is really nothing but the goodwill of the job centres to stop them from pushing women into jobs they don't want to do."

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wor...s-a-prostitute-we-can-stop-your-benefits.html
 
hmm. I read this earlier. I'm totally fine with legal. totally fine with being able to offer or advertise or whatever. But there should be an exemption for acceptance - your choice on this one, I'm afraid. This is forced sex trade - exactly at least in part what they legalise prostitution to avoid.
 
Nice troll, shaydee. Surprised nobody noticed the "2005" though. :)

http://www.snopes.com/media/notnews/brothel.asp

However, left-ard / socialist governments have in the past and do continue to inflict similar upon their downtrodden near choiceless citizens.

Gillard's Fabian Socialism and Brown's greenazism lead to the same oppressive state of affairs.

... as things luciferic / anti-christian tend to.

regarDS
 
Nice troll, shaydee. Surprised nobody noticed the "2005" though. :)

http://www.snopes.com/media/notnews/brothel.asp

However, left-ard / socialist governments have in the past and do continue to inflict similar upon their downtrodden near choiceless citizens.

Gillard's Fabian Socialism and Brown's greenazism lead to the same oppressive state of affairs.

... as things luciferic / anti-christian tend to.

regarDS

It wasn't a troll you fucking hypocrite. Take a look in the mirror before YOU call me that.

Oh no, someone's wrong on the internet!!!

However, i'm glad it's not true.
 
Yeah I'm glad too.

It is quite bizarre you were called a troll by someone whose entire persona appears to me to be based on emotive and inflammatory posting.
scratch_one-s_head.gif
 
Last edited:
lols @ the strange, OOT, and utterly unjustified Gillardian like lashing out.

Question. Should the unemployed be obliged to take jobs serving alcohol at pubs and bars or face having their benefits cut ?

regarDS

Their benefits would not be cut.

1.1.U.55 Unsuitable work (NSA,YA)
Definition
For the purposes of NSA and YA, work may be unsuitable for a job seeker if it:
requires particular skills, experience or qualifications that the person does not have, and appropriate training will not be provided by the employer,
may aggravate a pre-existing illness, disability (1.1.D.160) or injury and medical evidence has been provided or an ESAt/JCA supporting this has been provided,
involves health or safety risks and would contravene an occupational health and safety law,
the terms and conditions for the work are less generous than the applicable statutory conditions,
involves commuting from home to work that would be unreasonably difficult,
involves working more hours than a person's assessed capacity,
involves enlistment in the Defence force or the Reserve forces,
is the subject of industrial disputation, or
the work requires the person to change their residence, or
in the Secretary's opinion, is unsuitable for any other reason.
Example: On the basis of moral, cultural or religious grounds.


Act reference: SSAct section 601(2A) Unsuitable work for NSA, section 541D(1) Unsuitable work for YA
Policy reference: SS Guide 3.2.8.60 Unsuitable Work

http://www.fahcsia.gov.au/guides_acts/ssg/ssguide-1/ssguide-1.1/ssguide-1.1.u/pc_13667.html
 
I was pointing out to those who may not realise that in Australia we have laws covering employment and this includes unsuitable work. Good law imo.
 
Last edited:
I was pointing out to those who may not realise that in Australia we have laws covering employment and this includes unsuitable work. Good law imo.

Yup, and similar to the kind of law Denmark now needs so that Priests, Rabbis, Imans (etc etc etc) can't be forced to allow their places of worship from being profaned by practitioners/activists of/for homosexual behaviour and/or they themselves be forced to conduct certain ceremonies that are in direct opposition to that which is deemed Holy according to their faiths.

After all, if somebody shouldn't be forced to accept certain types of employment, others shouldn't be forced to carry out certain kinds of work ... and others still, shouldn't be forced to employ or do work for certain types of people, yes ?

regarDS
 
Back
Top