Episode Day 26 Daily Show - 4/12/2025

[KTOM]

Very much so, apparently.

View attachment 71361

lol

 

[Tim]

 

[Zcsund1234]

okay I have to be honest, I get really peeved when people say "this persons a threat so they need to be nominated' like I get it, kind of... If someone is threatening to win the game then it is implied that they are likely popular with the audience.

I get the surface level reasoning of just putting them up for that reason, but isn't it a bit redundant to put someone up when they're likely to be saved anyway? Why risk putting yourself up with them? I just find it funny is all.

 

[the Theorist]

lol
View attachment 71363

Not the sight you wanna see through a glory hole.

 

[Tim]

 

[Butterfly_Wings]

I love how they can’t see Em as they’re biggest threat

 

[Expressive]

So is Emily Alana's EA in this house?

 

[razza1987]

okay I have to be honest, I get really peeved when people say "this persons a threat so they need to be nominated' like I get it, kind of... If someone is threatening to win the game then it is implied that they are likely popular with the audience.

I get the surface level reasoning of just putting them up for that reason, but isn't it a bit redundant to put someone up when they're likely to be saved anyway? Why risk putting yourself up with them? I just find it funny is all.

The mindset is that the more that person gets put up the more likely it will be that they go

 

[Matty492]

If I hear 'Bro' one more time, I'm killing myself for fuck sakes

 

[Butterfly_Wings]

Based on that edit - Ed is going home next

 

[Rain]

I don't know how anyone can find Colin entertaining or interesting. He's a frigging eshay.

 

[sav0001]

okay I have to be honest, I get really peeved when people say "this persons a threat so they need to be nominated' like I get it, kind of... If someone is threatening to win the game then it is implied that they are likely popular with the audience.

I get the surface level reasoning of just putting them up for that reason, but isn't it a bit redundant to put someone up when they're likely to be saved anyway? Why risk putting yourself up with them? I just find it funny is all.

I would get it if people were paying to vote because the more you put them up for eviction, the more you deplete the finances of their fanbase.

But when voting is free, there is no point.

 

[Lightning McQueen]

okay I have to be honest, I get really peeved when people say "this persons a threat so they need to be nominated' like I get it, kind of... If someone is threatening to win the game then it is implied that they are likely popular with the audience.

I get the surface level reasoning of just putting them up for that reason, but isn't it a bit redundant to put someone up when they're likely to be saved anyway? Why risk putting yourself up with them? I just find it funny is all.

You'd be hoping everyone else is thinking strategically as well, and not seeing you as much of a threat.

 

[Tim]

Ed destruction edit

 

[Butterfly_Wings]

Still no mention of eviction date let alone double

 

[Affable]

Colin has the best eviction short with the thumbs up.

 

[Lightning McQueen]

I love the wildlife...
The creepy crawlies...

 

[Zcsund1234]

Jeez they are really painting it like Ed has already been evicted

 

[DOTTI]

Effing hilarious! If i was on my laptop, that would be a prized coffee spit emoji, that's for sure!

I'm going to hell in a handbasket for it but I don't care, hehe.

 

[the Theorist]

Performative little shit head

"manifesting edit-level motivation for all you lovely brevs"

View this content on Instagram

View this content on Instagram