nutmeg
Well-Known Member
Conspiracy theory
I just watched Bit On The Psych and I reckon Dan might be right about Wolfie. When he first said it, I was 100% sure he was wrong. But ...
1. At the start of BOTP Dr Funke brought up the mole situation (which is well and truly out of the bag) and she said "Dan obviously found out that someone was the actor, you know, I don't want to say". Odd.
2. Two thirds of the way through she says "I think Big Brother have met their own with Dan".
3. The other expert says of Dan "I think he's brilliant at reading people". BB wouldn't want their psychs or body language experts to give up a secret mole, so surely they would word them up. BUT the expert doesn't want to appear incompetent, so while they can't give up the mole, they could praise the 'brilliance' of the housemate who has it all sussed.
4. Wolfie was the sacrificial lamb in the last task, which was phenomenally cruel for a real housemate but not cruel at all for a paid actor/mole.
5. Wolfie is a bit mad with talking to animals/insects, which could be true but is insane enough to be part of a lie.
6. Dan clearly has great skills at sussing people out.
7. Michael did a great job under the circs, but some things he did strangely, eg someone pointed out that why would an actor/mole go to bed so much? Maybe he needed to get rumbled to put a nail in the coffin of the mole conspiracy, in order to leave room for the real mole to work without suspicion.
Then they tried to throw us off the scent at the end of BOTP by denying Wolfie is a mole (complete with a video package: too insistent?) but they are all paid by BB, even Michael. AJ says of Wolfie being an actor "but Wolfie, come on ..." but later says about Dan being an actor (in the news) "Well you're both wrong so up yours. He is in fact a real housemate, as is everyone else" - much more definite.
Obviously I am not sure, but I think that Michael might have been a decoy mole so that we don't discover the real mole, be it Wolfie or someone else. What do you guys think?
I just watched Bit On The Psych and I reckon Dan might be right about Wolfie. When he first said it, I was 100% sure he was wrong. But ...
1. At the start of BOTP Dr Funke brought up the mole situation (which is well and truly out of the bag) and she said "Dan obviously found out that someone was the actor, you know, I don't want to say". Odd.
2. Two thirds of the way through she says "I think Big Brother have met their own with Dan".
3. The other expert says of Dan "I think he's brilliant at reading people". BB wouldn't want their psychs or body language experts to give up a secret mole, so surely they would word them up. BUT the expert doesn't want to appear incompetent, so while they can't give up the mole, they could praise the 'brilliance' of the housemate who has it all sussed.
4. Wolfie was the sacrificial lamb in the last task, which was phenomenally cruel for a real housemate but not cruel at all for a paid actor/mole.
5. Wolfie is a bit mad with talking to animals/insects, which could be true but is insane enough to be part of a lie.
6. Dan clearly has great skills at sussing people out.
7. Michael did a great job under the circs, but some things he did strangely, eg someone pointed out that why would an actor/mole go to bed so much? Maybe he needed to get rumbled to put a nail in the coffin of the mole conspiracy, in order to leave room for the real mole to work without suspicion.
Then they tried to throw us off the scent at the end of BOTP by denying Wolfie is a mole (complete with a video package: too insistent?) but they are all paid by BB, even Michael. AJ says of Wolfie being an actor "but Wolfie, come on ..." but later says about Dan being an actor (in the news) "Well you're both wrong so up yours. He is in fact a real housemate, as is everyone else" - much more definite.
Obviously I am not sure, but I think that Michael might have been a decoy mole so that we don't discover the real mole, be it Wolfie or someone else. What do you guys think?
