I don't know how I feel about this. On one hand I have a lot of mates from smaller town who explain there can be certain mentalities about these issues. It is hard to change views when all those around you are perpetuation a specific style of thinking and beliefs. She didn't come as overly hateful, possibly set in her ways and not fully educated on the issue (As I have found most people who are well read on the issue tend to be able to expand on their views etc.) but just views and perceptions she has gained from general observation. From what we have seen she has not been overly aggressive with these conservative views, so maybe it is a case of let people have their own opinions if they are trying to throw their beliefs down your throat if you don't agree. I see this as being a small part of her personality, and these sort of views can always be changed with age, experiences and exposure to other ideals and people. Who knows, perhaps she has become slightly more liberal in her thinking being in the house are surrounded by what seems to be a majority of people who don't hold the same views.
I guess I don't think she should be vilified for a generalised comment made during an intro interview when there has been no other actions to state she is racist (also I do know some people who just do not like the whole 'boat people' situation who object purely from a immigration and security check objection, and not from their race or religion). In saying this, I want to clarify I am a huge supporter of immigration and refugees, and have no problem with Australia taking them in and providing fellow human beings with a happy and safe environment to live in. Having helped out in a refugee health check center, and having to conduct fully health and family history profiles, the stories you hears, experiences they have gone through, scars and wounds they still have from being persecuted, I find it hard not to emphasise with them.
Sorry! Rant over... :S