I have thoughts on the UK final (that I only just finished on 10Play). What I saw as a fatal flaw of logic, and something Frankie should have vehemently defended, is that Frankie, as The Seer would not have revealed herself to Charlotte as a traitor (if she happened to be one). The Seer revealing their true identity was not part of the arrangement, and anyone would be insane to do so. If only Frankie had just said to the others at the breakfast table "Why would I have told Charlotte whether I was a traitor or not? I had no obligation to reveal anything; what she's saying doesn't make sense," and just nip all the paranoid accusations in the bud. There's no logic to it when the entire game is about not revealing your identity as a traitor. Why would you fall at the last hurdle for no reason? And in the case of them potentially both being suspected as traitors, the others would know it's against the rules to overtly point the finger at another traitor, so there goes that theory. In the scenario where Charlotte revealed herself as a faithful, I think it would have been totally against character for Frankie to try and frame her as a traitor. They would have emerged with their detective hats on (even if Charlotte, if a faithful, still had suspicions about Frankie) suspecting the others. Also, yes it's a game, but I do think Charlotte did stoop too low with her false accusations considering she and Frankie were supposed to be friends.