Skip to main content

The Bachelor Australia 2015

Also douchey move from producers etc who keep sending her out for interviews which, to be honest, drum up interest in the show, if it's not going to end well for her.
well she'd know if she's won or not - and she'd have the option to do the interviews or not if it was past the contractual agreement ...

whether she wins Bachie or not Heather is the major winner in this - Australia loves her (well ... except for sorceress ... but we have time to win her over to the Hbomb team ;)
 
Loving the manufactured drama.
Isn't it funny how Sam randomly goes off script and bumps into a few random production ladies before Osher appears, immaculate and ready as if lurking in someone's house while they date a dozen women is the most natural thing in the world.
 
So what is everyones thoughts now about Lana's friends video on IG?

Do you think that was to show that she won?

Also, I went through alot of Snezanas followings and where they are located, most seem to be Melbourne and occasionally Perth.
 
In Melbourne there are a couple of place on Chappel street and another some where else in Melbourne. I went to the 1 on Chappel st the atmosphere and meals were just yummy. Very different menu with them using whisky a lot(love it)
The Chapel St one is the closest to me and to work, but I'm going to the Forest Hill one.
 
well she'd know if she's won or not - and she'd have the option to do the interviews or not if it was past the contractual agreement ...

whether she wins Bachie or not Heather is the major winner in this - Australia loves her (well ... except for sorceress ... but we have time to win her over to the Hbomb team ;)
I'm not into her and I won't be convinced :)
 
So what is everyones thoughts now about Lana's friends video on IG?

Do you think that was to show that she won?

Also, I went through alot of Snezanas followings and where they are located, most seem to be Melbourne and occasionally Perth.

What video?
 
What video?

One where they were having a Bach party on the night they aired her first rose ceremony and they were cheering that she got the rose.
Some are apparently extrapolating that over the whole thing and are taking it to mean they were cheering because she won. :confused:
 
To be fair, this is one guys opinion
and it was on the night of Lana's date
We'll have to see if what he says stacks up.

I can't wait to see whoever the actual winner is announced on screen. And then we get to do it all again for Bachelorette.


Pretty sure Snez has said that her father has nothing to do with her? I think it was an early episode

Ah, ok. Well that makes things a tiny bit easier as far as legal stuff goes. Still pretty tricky though.
 
I'm pretty sure Snez said that Eve lives with her full time...however she also said that she's in regular contact with Eve's dad (they "talk") so it's hard to tell how involved he is.

Snez may have also been downplaying the dad's involvement on the first night as to not scare Sam off initially. Who knows. I'm looking forward to tonight because this has been the question I've wanted to see them address.
 
yes but then why would she be open to even try to find love on a show like this where you can almost guarantee Bachie isn't going to be from WA ... she must think its her way or the highway in that regard ... and that is hardly fair to have that attitude
she might as well have said on first date Hi I'm Snez and unless you've moving to WA dont be bothering with me
Hmm I don't think that's fair. Why does it fall on snezena? The bachelor must realise they are finding potential love interests for him and they will be all over AUS. Not just Melbourne based, like in the case of Sam. It's two ways not just on snezena. Plus he and her were probably thinking it was going to be an issue when they realised how far they live, but they made the connection unlike many who were closer ranged to him.

Yes My feminist side is coming out. But I don't think it should fall on snezena alone
 
I think for me it's one of those reminders that entertainment aside, the concept is very messed up. Yes Sam gets all the control when making the decisions about who would be best for him...but at the end of the day when someone wins they're both going to need to make sacrifices for a relationship to work. It makes you wonder if and/or when the power dynamics in the relationship change post show. Sam Frosts' comments about how Blake called all the shots in their short relationship and then all of them in their breakup have sort of stuck with me.
I find this interesting. You're right, the control is with Sam atm, post show I wonder how it goes. I never watched the Nast bachelor and know nothing of Blake and Sam, but there were so many articles on them.

Someone like Snez, I don't think she would be the type to be the submissive type at all, or heather, or Sarah, in fact I can't see any of them being this way post show.
 
I find this interesting. You're right, the control is with Sam atm, post show I wonder how it goes. I never watched the Nast bachelor and know nothing of Blake and Sam, but there were so many articles on them.

Someone like Snez, I don't think she would be the type to be the submissive type at all, or heather, or Sarah, in fact I can't see any of them being this way post show.
Yep when you think about it, in reality none of the front runners seem compatible.
Perhaps that's why he likes Lana, she has travelled and lived in Mexico, maybe she's ready to settle down.
 
Hmm I don't think that's fair. Why does it fall on snezena? The bachelor must realise they are finding potential love interests for him and they will be all over AUS. Not just Melbourne based, like in the case of Sam. It's two ways not just on snezena. Plus he and her were probably thinking it was going to be an issue when they realised how far they live, but they made the connection unlike many who were closer ranged to him.

Yes My feminist side is coming out. But I don't think it should fall on snezena alone
I found Sam's assertion to Lana that Melbourne was the given wasn't very diplomatic. Maybe he is controlling, or maybe he thinks Bachelor gets say. I don't think all men think like that. He should have pretended it was a discussion.
 
Yep when you think about it, in reality none of the front runners seem compatible.
Perhaps that's why he likes Lana, she has travelled and lived in Mexico, maybe she's ready to settle down.
Well she has moved her life for a boyfriend. She seems like she adapts and goes with the flow. It might work for him. But I'm still not sold on them.
 
I find this interesting. You're right, the control is with Sam atm, post show I wonder how it goes. I never watched the Nast bachelor and know nothing of Blake and Sam, but there were so many articles on them.

Someone like Snez, I don't think she would be the type to be the submissive type at all, or heather, or Sarah, in fact I can't see any of them being this way post show.

Girl you and me both. I know Snez would have gone into it knowing there was a high likelihood of Bachie living far away...but Sam also went into the experience I'm sure knowing that there was a high likelihood of the girls he connects with most not living in Melbourne. It'll be interesting if they end up together who ends up being more willing to make that sacrifice. His "how attached" are you to WA also tells me that maybe Sam doesn't really understand the weight of Snez's current situation.

I just really hope she questions him tonight about whether he'd be willing to do it for her as well because the ball cant be in Sam's court forever.
 
Back
Top