Zcsund1234
Well-Known Member
Omg what?
Yeah I do agree that the non eliminations always seem to follow a really interesting scramble where a big player was about to go. I wonder if that’s intentional though?This series is a shit show - everytime something potentially interesting happens production kill it off.
Had to think who on earth Ben was. The off screen exit suggests there is more to his exit than they're telling us.
This series is a shit show - everytime something potentially interesting happens production kill it off.
Had to think who on earth Ben was. The off screen exit suggests there is more to his exit than they're telling us.
All they really have to do is drop 2 episodes, there only needs to be 22 eliminations. And if they really want a final 3 then all that needs to be done is maybe have the launch, or the tribe swap or even the merge be a 2 parter. The number of days doesn't need to decrease nor do they need to include a convoluted twist.JLP also calling on the show to axe non-eliminations and just cast a couple more people instead. Don't really think 26 v 24 would make much difference.
![]()
Jonathan LaPaglia: "Get rid of the non-eliminations" in Australian Survivor | TV Tonight
Survivor host would make one change to the show if he had his way.tvtonight.com.au
I’m simply restating what’s already been said. I am not the primary source of this information. Don’t try and insinuate otherwise. And furthermore don’t give me morality advice. Please and thanks xBen is married and has kids. You might want to be careful and respectful at throwing out wild “accusations/rumours”.
Ben is married and has kids. You might want to be careful and respectful at throwing out wild “accusations/rumours”.
You haven't been watching the US series Mr Sticky. lol. You would love the amount of advantages and 'island secrets'. There are so many that literally everyone experiences an advantage at least once now.…yet another fucking clue?… I give up!… cheers.