Bindi Irwin and now One Direction. this guy has issues.
The impression I got of the IBT articles was that they were just 'newsifying' fan chatter, some of it from this site. I don't think they would have had an actual point of view.
Would it really be so hard for the producers to require contestants to have their partners and families sign agreements to not offer or promote offers of goods or services as inducements to vote?
thats a bloody joke Tim gets to test out the waterslides at wet n wild just because he was on Big Brother. its going to be packed from tomorrow onwards but he is special enough to have the damn park to himself? I hope he actually paid for the privilege. he can afford it.
haha that would be a funny game for a slow day in here... suggest the perfect sponsor for each of the HMs.I agree that there is no simple way to exclude potential HM's who may have Corporate connections. In saying that, the real question is, does any unaffiliated (with BB or Ch9) corporation or conglomerate really have any business aligning themselves with a particular HM without explicit, legal permission from the producers? If that does becomes the case, then we might just see 16 HM's in 2014 who all have a bloody sponsorship deal (as a favourable pre-requisite at auditions). Imagine that!
"Hi, I'm Mary and I'm with Team Garnier"... "G'day, John here... AUS Steel Homes"... "Caleb... Just do it!"
I see what you're saying, that both Jade and Tim had none of this forced hype or advertising in order to get them to the end. I hope BB can find a way around the unfair advantage that could potentially see a HM winning due to Corporate support.
is that a bullet hole on Rock 5 from left?
![]()
totally OT but can ya tell I'm bored today?
Would you like me to send you some papers to grade? Anything to help...