Skip to main content

Post BB - Housemate Antics 2013 - Part 2

Status
Not open for further replies.
Tully Smyth ‏@tee_smyth 1m
Packing for @SITG tomorrow with @timdormer thanks to @Smirnoff_Aus. Definitely overpacked. How many pairs of sunnies is too many?
270c.png
1f308.png
1f49c.png



we should have some photos of Tully and Tim tomorrow night
 
Gemini said:
FFS we get it! You're not gay! No need to find ways to lace it into every post.

:bang::bang::bang::bang::bang::bang::bang::bang::bang:
Click to expand...
Just 'splaining why I didn't linger over the pic enough to notice his 'mascaping' and complain about his pubes (like SES did) is all.

On second thought bitching about Drew's state of undress would've improved my 'forum cred' among some posters in here I suppose 'cos that's cool whatever. :confused:
 
Connoisseur said:
Just 'splaining why I didn't linger over the pic enough to notice his 'mascaping' and complain about his pubes (like SES did) is all.

On second thought bitching about Drew's state of undress would've improved my 'forum cred' among some posters in here I suppose 'cos that's cool whatever. :confused:
Click to expand...

I would rather you be "bitching about Drew's state of undress", rather than making fun of another poster and trying to insinuate he is gay or somehow less "manly" than you because he noticed Drew's manscaping.

Trust me, your constant veiled derogatory remarks about anything homosexual or your need to say in every second post "as a straight man" says a lot more about you than SES noticing Drew's pubes says about him.


Okay, sorry guys, I'm done now.
 
Last edited:
Gemini said:
You weren't "bitching about Drew's state of undress", you were making fun of another poster and trying to insinuate he is gay or somehow less "manly" than you because he noticed Drew's manscaping.

Trust me, your constant veiled derogatory remarks about anything homosexual or your need to say in every second post "as a straight man" says a lot more about you than SES noticing Drew's pubes says about him.


Okay, sorry guys, I'm done now.
Click to expand...

You weren't "bitching about Drew's state of undress",
Click to expand...
Yeah that was SES obviously. As a hetero I just pointed out that it was odd that another straight guy (I presume) would notice that let alone be negatively (i.e. bitching) commenting on it.


The fact you think insinuating someone is gay is a 'slur' says a lot more about you than it does about me. People have called me gay on occasssions (in real life and on the interwebz) and I've never reacted as if they had insulted me. :confused:

But go on, continue bersmirching me if it makes you feel all warm and fuzzy inside. O_O
 
smurfette said:
Work is work, and modelling Tigermist rubbish provides an income - so fair enough doing the shoots (although why Tahan took leave from her job to do this cheap looking stuff is hard to get my head around).

But I don't think I would be constantly plastering pics from the shoots on SM. They are very average shots - both these girls are good looking with great modelling bodies, but are being made to look like they are entrants in a teen magazine modelling comp or something. I really don't think the Tigermist shots are great bodies of work to be repeatedly showcasing (and the ones where the two of them are together remind me of the Sugars).
Click to expand...


Almost as bad as when Jade and Tim call the rags to take a series of staged phony pictures of them walking along the waterside simply to get their names and images out there in a pathetic attempt to stay relevant. Who would have thought that banging a series of footy players wouldn't keep you in the public eye.
 
Mooseface said:
You know, I think Tigermist is worse. Sugars is simply bad. Tigermist is actually fugly.
Click to expand...
I just can't get past their need to stretch photographs to (I guess?) obtain the perfect body image for their website to even notice the clothes. It just is so ridiculous ...personally don't think either one of them has a body they should be 'tweaking' in order to put up on website - and if they could just find another pose to strike rather than the faux curtsey holding the skirt out thing I could happily continue on my merry way ... but instead find myself STILL grinding my teeth at any of the tweets posted here (whether it contains yet more diabetic nightmare foodie shots or their lastest flogging of clothes)
 
crimmy said:
I just can't get past their need to stretch photographs to (I guess?) obtain the perfect body image for their website to even notice the clothes. It just is so ridiculous ...personally don't think either one of them has a body they should be 'tweaking' in order to put up on website - and if they could just find another pose to strike rather than the faux curtsey holding the skirt out thing I could happily continue on my merry way ... but instead find myself STILL grinding my teeth at any of the tweets posted here (whether it contains yet more diabetic nightmare foodie shots or their lastest flogging of clothes)
Click to expand...

I know - I just don't understand the stretching. It's not as if it is done subtlety, it's sticks out a mile, and doesn't improve the look of the items at all. It just makes me question what is wrong with how the clothes look that they have to try to disguise it so poorly.
 
tim dormer‏@timdormer
My present for @tee_smyth to use at Splendour this weekend... A 'SHEWEE' portable urinating device for women. #squat

  1. Tully Smyth ‏@tee_smyth 13m
    @timdormer Please tell me this is a joke. If you bring that thing I'm refusing to be seen with you.

    tim dormer ‏@timdormer 9m
  2. @tee_smyth it's packed. Hey I'm not waiting for hours while you line up for a portaloo!
tim dormer ‏@timdormer 4m
@tee_smyth you just wait to see what I'm wearing...oh and I've packed a slingshot.

Details

upload_2014-7-25_11-17-22.png
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top