...this is one of the big reasons that I like about your postings sav0001... you are always the 'voice of reason' within these forums at times and believe me... we need someone like that to keep us in check at times lol!... I totally agree with you about how well this rates for them... obviously it is a big rater and it will be around to celebrate it's 20th year anniversary too no doubt... but in saying that I still believe that the show needs to trim down and change... I've only watched the last 3 or 4 seasons from memory but I have noticed that even in that short time that the show is slowly becoming more and more bogged down by Gary and George's obvious manipulations of what results that they want... the only time this changes is when a guest judge stands their ground about a dish and then Matt gets on board... then the result is on an equal playing field... that's just one example...
...another example is that they seem to be 'padding out' the weeks with extra stuff and misinformation as far as I am concerned anyway... just for the reason that you gave sav0001... to keep getting the ratings... that's fair enough but just take last week where they kept blah blahhing on about 'Royals WEEK'... it was more like Royals 15 minutes' in reality... and Charlie didn't even taste anything at all (due to Royal protocol as someone told us)... with them calling it 'Royals week' myself (and perhaps others) may have expected Charlie and his other half to be on a least a couple of nights to fulfill it's 'Royals week' blurb... they should have said 'Royal Night' if anything... and also this week... it's the sooper dooper mega survivor week... why drag it out for the week?... usually they could say that the bottom 3 are in the elimination in one night... (or perhaps the bottom 6 in one night?)... it seems to me at least like they are also saying too much of "this is the biggest thing in Masterchef history... blah blah!" or "you will be the first in Masterchef history to... blah blah blah!"... why the need for that?... they're beginning to sound like Channels 9 and 7 with their often over exaggerated claims just to sell the show... they don't need to say all of that guff because as you say... it's one of their highest rating showsfor thrm anyway...
...when I started to watch the show (I think 3 years ago or maybe 4 as I said before) that the show was brilliant but even in the last two years I've seen it being slowly over inflating itself with creating each of the contestants with a 'storyline for their journey' ... (MKR does that and it loses viewers because of it in my opinion)... earlier than that there were contestants that just cooked and got through on their own merits from what I saw back then... I've had my kids and even my grand kids telling me that Masterchef's best episodes were the first 6 or 7 years of the show were and that it needs to change... especially changing the 2 judges we all complain about... that would be a good start...
...I sometimes wish that I started to watch Masterchef from season one to just know what they've said about the first 5-7 years and whether it's true or not... I can't be arsed to try and track it all down to be honest lol!... anyhow... that's my take on it anyway... but I'm glad that yourself and others are still finding it highly watchable my friend... perhaps I'm just too 'picky' and 'finnicky' my friend?... lol!... cheers.