Last movie you saw

Why would god send angels to destroy the saviour? Has god gone bi polar?

Well it's the god from the bible, that gets bored and kills the human race. Like with the Flood ect. That crap. So he once against lost love for humans.

The way god and even the devil have changed from what they were in the bible and in the past stories compared to todays interpretations are so different. God wasn't as good and the devil wasn't as bad.
 
Why would god send angels to destroy the saviour? Has god gone bi polar?

Mudcake, according to imdb..

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1038686/

mm looks kinda good

Well it's the god from the bible, that gets bored and kills the human race. Like with the Flood ect. That crap. So he once against lost love for humans.

The way god and even the devil have changed from what they were in the bible and in the past stories compared to todays interpretations are so different. God wasn't as good and the devil wasn't as bad.





Now I know what movie you're all on about...... I avoided it due to bad reviews.
 
INCEPTION
About 40 minutes into the movie I'm thinking "It's okay, but really a bit overhyped", but by the end.... ahh hell wow. It definitely had me in. This is a movie that people are going to write tonnes of fan fiction over. What starts as a fairly obvious idea... people stepping into other peoples dreams... but it takes it and twists it into something a good deal deeper.

And the ending.... :)
 
Natural Born Killers
Very violent. Perhaps the most violent film I've seen actually. It was just non-stop. The whole film felt like a 2 hour long music video. It was an assault on the senses, with many disorienting jump cuts. It was quite an experience, but good.
 
INCEPTION
About 40 minutes into the movie I'm thinking "It's okay, but really a bit overhyped", but by the end.... ahh hell wow. It definitely had me in. This is a movie that people are going to write tonnes of fan fiction over. What starts as a fairly obvious idea... people stepping into other peoples dreams... but it takes it and twists it into something a good deal deeper.

And the ending.... :)

Good to hear, hubby and I saw the preview and we were impressed.
 
INCEPTION
About 40 minutes into the movie I'm thinking "It's okay, but really a bit overhyped", but by the end.... ahh hell wow. It definitely had me in. This is a movie that people are going to write tonnes of fan fiction over. What starts as a fairly obvious idea... people stepping into other peoples dreams... but it takes it and twists it into something a good deal deeper.

And the ending.... :)


But how does he do that...... Is it helped via technology?
 
Inception is quite possibly the best movie I have ever seen. The movie does not reward without effort from the viewer. Those that sit there mindlessly watching and waiting for action will not follow it, and will not "get" it. It begins quite messily, and I'll be honest - I thought Nolan had completely botched it at first. Almost incomprehensible, the film launches ahead without ever really explaining the process we are witnessing. Flashes of dreams...perhaps reality, dart in and out of each other as Nolan throws you from one location to another, never really explaining the link between them. Someone's dreaming, or do they only think they're dreaming? Is someone else dreaming for them? Or, is someone dreaming that they're dreaming?

Be prepared to put up with 20 minutes to half an hour of asking yourself that, and wondering if you're going to have the stamina to sit through over two and a half hours of obvious cuts from scenario to scenario, with only the tiniest sentences to tie it all together. Then it happens, we reach reality (or what seems like reality) and a plot is introduced. Cobb (Leo) is a criminal (Or is he? If he is, what are his crimes? If he isn't, what do people think are his crimes? Do people think he is a criminal, or does he think he is a criminal?) who possesses the technology to enter the minds of people when they are asleep, and to trick the subconscious into divulging their secrets. A businessman offers him a deal to the opposite of this process, to implant one very simple idea into the mind of a competitor - a process called Inception. Cobb then assembles a team to perform this seemingly impossible task.

That, on the face of it, is the very simple plot of this movie. And it is a very simple plot - but I don't think that's the real plot of the film. To the person watching the movie without thinking, waiting for the action scenes...it may indeed appear to be the plot and Inception would run like a satisfactory movie like this. But the real plot is something much more sinister and somewhat disturbing and much, much more interesting.

The characters in this script aren't well developed - but for good reason. The acting is superb, there is not a single weak performance anywhere (nor would you expect there to be, Inception is probably the most talented cast assembled in years, despite many not being popular names). There is, however, one stand out performance - Marion Cotillard as "Mal". Who is Mal? Mal is The Shade, and it's a disservice to her character and Cotillard's performance to describe her as anything else. That probably means nothing to those who haven't seen it - but Cotillard's performance and role is powerful, frightening and undoubtedly schizophrenic in the way it's written. I cannot recall a role like it, and there's a reason why Cotillard (probably the most acclaimed - at least recently - of the cast is absent from promotional material). I was not affected by any character in this movie like I was Mal, and I'm not sure I've ever seen such a role for a female performer before.

There is also The Architect (Ellen Page), The Mark (Cillian Murphy), The Forger (Tom Hardy), The Point-Man (Joseph Gordon-Levitt), in addition to The Tourist (Watanabe) and The Extractor (DiCaprio). These mean nothing to you, but they will once you watch the movie. What you cannot expect from Inception to be brought to tears, frightened or perhaps even shocked in a massive way. Those familiar with Nolan’s style of filmmaking will find it hard to believe that there is no shocking twist in his movie. Nolan is famous for sending the viewer down a path where they form expectations, only to have it violently pulled the other way – blowing all expectations out of the water.

Nolan is subdued here, and indeed I think this has been another source of wrongful criticism from some people. Quite early on in the movie, after the initial flurry of events, Nolan does something quite scary. At the same time a character is pulled into a dream, the audience is pulled in with them. We do not realise this, nor do they – until we are told. From this moment onwards, the film flows impeccably well – picking up the nightmarish-mess from the beginning and neatly unfolding it in front of the audience over the rest of the two-hours or so duration of the movie. I was not shocked by Inception the way you would expect. Instead, the film has had a more powerful impact on me. While I let Nolan weave me in and out of this dream world, he did something profound that I’m not sure many people noticed. He planted an idea, and one that has prevented me from concentrating on anything else all night – and it’s the reason I’ve written this massive review / evaluation. I want to watch the movie again, to return to this dream world to try and decipher this idea that’s been put in my head by it.

This probably will not make sense until you see the movie, and once you have and you experience something similar, you’ll realise why Inception is the best piece of filmmaking you’ve probably ever seen.
 
Ah have to avoid seeing inception things... got my tickets book, best seats in the house in the best cinema in my part of melb tomorrow.
 
Ah have to avoid seeing inception things... got my tickets book, best seats in the house in the best cinema in my part of melb tomorrow.

It's really worth not knowing anything. I'd seen a couple of trailers and that was it. The person I was with knows what I'm like and said to me before it started "What's this actually about, you must know everything that happens by now" and I answered honestly, "I have absolutely no idea, it's some sort of heist movie about dreams". It was good not knowing stuff for once (the curse of the internet!).
 
Oh good. The last movie I saw Leo DiCaprio in (Shelter Island) was so boring that I likely wouldn't have bothered with this one.
 
Oh good. The last movie I saw Leo DiCaprio in (Shelter Island) was so boring that I likely wouldn't have bothered with this one.

That film was dumb dumb dumb.

Like it told you what the twist was fairly early on, then pretended it didn't and it was eh.. yeah I didn't like it at all. Don't know why people raved about it.

Leo generally does good films though. One of the few actors who you can basically go, oh they do good films, i'll see it with little extra knowledge than he's in it.

That said i never saw revolutionary road, meant to be good but didn't interest me.
 
That film was dumb dumb dumb.

Like it told you what the twist was fairly early on, then pretended it didn't and it was eh.. yeah I didn't like it at all. Don't know why people raved about it.

Leo generally does good films though. One of the few actors who you can basically go, oh they do good films, i'll see it with little extra knowledge than he's in it.

That said i never saw revolutionary road, meant to be good but didn't interest me.

What was the twist in Shutter Island?
 
But how does he do that...... Is it helped via technology?

I'll let you find out. :) We can pick it apart in a few weeks when the people who want to see it have seen it.
It's a movie where if you go in super-logical, then you'll find all sorts of quibbles. Just accept the movies own internal logic.

I haven't seen Shutter Island, but I am curious to see it. I don't mind a slow movie if it's got a bit of meat to it.
 
I'm not going to label it "Best Movie Ever". That's overhyping it. But it's a good 'un.

I said "best movie I've seen, which is different!

I'm not saying it's my favourite film ever. I'm just saying that, technically speaking, I think it's nearly flawless. In particular the script. It's tight, and includes nothing it doesn't need to. The movie never indulges itself, but it never holds back. It stretches the concept behind it to it's full capacity - there was no "oh, but they could have done this and it would have been cooler!" moment. Perhaps I should rephrase, Inception is the most perfect a movie that it could have been and, so far, I'm not sure I've ever seen a film that I could say that about.
 
What was the twist in Shutter Island?

Wasn't it meant to be like a shock twist that he was just an insane person of the island living in his own reality? They were trying to bring him out of it by indulging it. It was just ehh.. it revealed this thing, then played it as if it was all real but you knew it wasn't and there was no pay off or anything.
 
Inception

I wasn't as blown away as I had hoped or expected, but it is excellent. So I did thoroughly enjoy it and found it all very interesting. I do plan on seeing it again, when I won't be sitting there paying close attention to everything, and too look out for some stuff I may have missed or not.

The messy stuff as mentioned by bb-06, really is just a device, of showing what it's like, when you're in a dream you're always in the middle, don't know how you got there, also just setting up the rules of the universe.

One thing though, they keep saying this is a one off no one will tackle again and that it's original. Personally I think it's ripe to be expanded. There is some stuff like the ending that you wouldn't want tainted by explained in a sequel, but the concept behind the film is rock solid and I'd love to experience more of these dream worlds and really the stories possible. While the emotional story is core to this film, that's done and more is possible. Although possibly with out that anchor it wouldn't work.

DOn't read below at all. It'll make no sense and deprive you of the thoughts of the film. It's also a lot of my rambling sorting out what I think in my head.
Now the ending. We all knew it'd have some ending like this. It was done better and worked more than I expected.

So is he really in a dream? Cobb and Mal were able to live such a long life time in the dreams because they built layers and layers on top of each other. They got lost in time, maybe they got lost in layers as well as Mal thought.

How would they ever know. The spinning top. Now here's the thing, if it fell over we're to believe it's the real world. Well his real world, and the spinning top wouldn't have changed through out the film in the films primary reality. So it spinning at the end, it should fall over. Unless you then think he created another alternate reality, that was how Saito came through on the promise to go home. The limbo was full of Cobbs memories. He stayed there for the decades as he aged building the world for Cobb to return to. Anythings possible.


Back to the spinning top, and this is something I will watch when I see it again. Did we ever see it fall over? OR did we see him knock it on the floor like when Ariadne walks in on cobb in the bathroom. Or did we see him just fumbling with it so it fell. Now this may be something i'm thinking of that wasn't an issue. I will definitely be looking for this next time I see the film. Is there a thing where he never let himself test to find out if it was real.
If it wasn't to tip at the end, but it did previously, then I guess we have to assume Saito created the dream world for him, and moved him from limbo to heaven??

Of course a central issue is, while time is quicker in a new reality than a previous one, at what point would someone not wake you up.

If Mal killed herself and woke in the real world, why not just chuck a bucket of water over Cobbs head and wake him up. Give him a kick. Unless he was in so deep that seconds are decades.

One big thing is, the kids at the end didn't seem to have aged and were in the same clothes. I am actually more thinking, reality was the real world, but Cobb got lost in limbo and so Saito gave him the gift of dreaming the world he wanted to live in.

I guess there's no answer. Just possibilities.


Interesting film.


Although i really liked the last two batman films, almost seems a waste Chris Nolan going back to them. Even though I can't wait to see the next one he does. I kind of want him to do something different. Like I really liked The Prestige.

It was interesting as he describes himself as a huge james bond fan, and Inception was his sort of twisted, sci-fi james bond film. Clearly from the numerous references, and the awesome james bond inspired evil villian lair.
Chris Nolan recently said he'd love to do a Bond film. Now that is something I want to see badly. Sure i'd see any thing with james bond, but those that make bond aren't stupid and I hope they have already set up a meeting to just discuss the idea.
 
Last edited:
How would they ever know. The spinning top. Now here's the thing, if it fell over we're to believe it's the real world. Well his real world, and the spinning top wouldn't have changed through out the film in the films primary reality. So it spinning at the end, it should fall over. Unless you then think he created another alternate reality, that was how Saito came through on the promise to go home. The limbo was full of Cobbs memories. He stayed there for the decades as he aged building the world for Cobb to return to. Anythings possible.


Back to the spinning top, and this is something I will watch when I see it again. Did we ever see it fall over? OR did we see him knock it on the floor like when Ariadne walks in on cobb in the bathroom. Or did we see him just fumbling with it so it fell. Now this may be something i'm thinking of that wasn't an issue. I will definitely be looking for this next time I see the film. Is there a thing where he never let himself test to find out if it was real.

The movie, in particular the ending, can have you in a loop trying to explain it to yourself. I can't remember, but did he
ever show Adriadne the top or allow her to handle it at some point?
.

Although i really liked the last two batman films, almost seems a waste Chris Nolan going back to them. Even though I can't wait to see the next one he does. I kind of want him to do something different. Like I really liked The Prestige.

Nolan's Batman films are different within themselves, though. Despite the fact he's made two Batman films - one's a sci-fi action-adventure and the other is a crime saga. Both are very different movies, and I expect the third movie to be something very different to not only BB and TDK, but also Inception, The Prestige etc. Especially since it was basically confirmed this weekend that one of the characters will be The Riddler (imagine the fun Nolan will have with riddles and puzzles).
 
Last edited:
Back
Top