Skip to main content

In The News

It's all kind of mindblowing...Sth Africa...that guy....that family....the cop.....the brother.....what next???

If he's innocent - it can only mean Sth Africa is a terrifying place to live, so freaky to react thus, but having no legs may make you feel vulnerable - but really..........weird, why would you not try speaking?

Can't believe I missed this..........

1WHITEnight-20130223170631223130-620x414.jpg

MELBOURNE'S first all-night arts extravaganza has far outstripped all expectations, drawing more than 300,000 people to the city centre between 7pm on Saturday and 7am on Sunday on a balmy, largely trouble-free night.

http://vimeo.com/60343963

[video=vimeo;60343963]http://vimeo.com/60343963[/video]

How awesome, pissed I missed it - anyone attend?
I will be ready for next year.
 
Kxk they don't use juries in South Africa according to the various bits of news on this case. Just a Judge will deliver verdicts in court cases there.
 
You can opt for no jury in most places - if the case is about technicalities/legal and otherwise it can often be more favourable.

But mor importantly - how about Melbourne's all nght festival, can't believe I missed it by being a bit unwell and not going into town for a couple of weeks:(
 
http://www.cnn.com/video/?hpt=hp_t3#/video/us/2013/03/04/nr-cpr-senior-living-center.cnn

This is just so sad. I want to bitchslap this woman.

She's on the phone to an emergency operator as a woman is in a bad way in a nursing home, possibly dying and the operator asks her if she can do CPR.

"Sorry it's against our policy" WTF? You're a nurse. The operator was pleading with her to help, even find someone to do the CPR instead of her. In the end the woman dies in an ambulance.

Just how messed up is this and how can it be legal that you have a nurse on staff but they can't do anything?

Why even bother having a fucking nurse on staff? Just let them all die. Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
 
http://www.cnn.com/video/?hpt=hp_t3#/video/us/2013/03/04/nr-cpr-senior-living-center.cnn

This is just so sad. I want to bitchslap this woman.

She's on the phone to an emergency operator as a woman is in a bad way in a nursing home, possibly dying and the operator asks her if she can do CPR.

"Sorry it's against our policy" WTF? You're a nurse. The operator was pleading with her to help, even find someone to do the CPR instead of her. In the end the woman dies in an ambulance.

Just how messed up is this and how can it be legal that you have a nurse on staff but they can't do anything?

Why even bother having a fucking nurse on staff? Just let them all die. Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

If you watched the video news story, they said before moving in to the independent living accommodation residents are advised there are no qualified medical staff on duty in the facility therefore I am assuming the "nurse" is a nurse assistant or similar. It's not a nursing home, it's like a retirement home/hostel

Also if you watched until the end, the journalists sought comment from the deceased ladies daughter and she said she was happy with the treatment her mother received.

You have no idea how much pressure staff are under in these places to adhere to policy/procedure.

and bitchslap, really?
 
Last edited:
Same here that just seems so weird.

Is there something going on with the Vic government?

Maybe he's jumping ship before shit hits the fan.
 
Speculation on the name the new Pope will choose:

What's in a name? Clues to be found in next pope's moniker
By Laura Smith-Spark, CNN
updated 5:20 AM EST, Mon March 4, 2013

STORY HIGHLIGHTS
  • The name chosen by the new pope could signal his outlook for the papacy
  • Past names can carry a message of conservatism or openness to reform
  • Benedict XVI meant his choice of name to be unifying
  • No pope is likely to pick Peter -- in part because of a centuries' old prophecy

(CNN) -- The secret election to pick a new pope has yet to begin. But whoever is picked may already be mulling over his choice of name -- and what it means.

In the long history of popes, stretching back two millennia to St. Peter, some names have picked up negative associations, while others have come to signify conservatism or a desire for change.

So what the new pontiff chooses may be one of the first clues to the course he intends to steer for the world's 1.2 billion Roman Catholics.

For example, Pius XII, who served from 1939 to 1958, was very conservative, said eminent Italian church historian Alberto Melloni.

"If the new pope was to call himself Pius XIII, it would be a very ideological choice," he said.

On the other side of the coin, a new pope that named himself John XXIV would be signaling an openness to reform.

John XXIII was famed for calling the Second Vatican Council in 1962, which ushered in great changes in the Roman Catholic Church's relationship with the modern world.

He was brave to pick the name John at all, says Melloni, since the last man to hold the name is viewed as an "antipope" because he was elected pontiff during a schism in the church in the 15th Century.

John XXIII got away with it because he said it was in deference to his parish saint, John the Baptist, Melloni said.

Benedict XVI, who gets to keep his name in rather than reverting to Joseph Ratzinger in his unprecedented position as pope emeritus, meant his choice to be unifying.

In his first general audience after taking office in 2005, he told the crowds gathered in St. Peter's Square that he wished to follow in the steps of Benedict XV, who led the church through the turbulent years of the First World War.

"He was a true and courageous prophet of peace who struggled strenuously and bravely, first to avoid the drama of war and then to limit its terrible consequences," Benedict XVI said. "In his footsteps I place my ministry, in the service of reconciliation and harmony between peoples."

The choice also evoked St. Benedict, founder of the Benedictine order of monks, who helped spread Christianity throughout Europe and was particularly venerated in Ratzinger's homeland, Germany.

For the early popes, the choice of a name wasn't an issue. It wasn't until the end of the 10th Century that the head of the church started taking a different name to the one he was born with, said Melloni.

But since then only one, Adrian VI in the 16th Century, has kept his baptismal name.

Some were monks from countries other than Italy who wanted to create a link through their names to the great saints of Rome. This was the start of the long list of popes named Leo, Gregory and Benedict, said Melloni.

In fact, he added, the practice can be seen as typical of a dynasty without sons and daughters -- creating a sense of succession and a link to the earliest names in the church.

In the 20th Century, John Paul I was the first to create a composite name, in tribute to the two popes who had led the church through the Second Vatican Council, which closed under Paul VI following John XXIII's death.

He died barely more than a month later, putting him among the shortest-lived of popes.

John Paul II, born Karol Wojtyla in Poland -- making him the first non-Italian pope since the 16th Century -- in turn wanted to show homage to that brief pontificate through carrying on the name, said Melloni.

As the 115 cardinal-electors prepare to meet in the conclave, for the secret election to pick a new pope almost certainly from within their number, the sense of intrigue will only grow.

"What you may find in the next few days will be the tendency not to try to guess who will be elected and and what name he will take, but to try to define the kind of pope they may hope for," said Melloni.

"There is a very conservative party within the cardinals who are hoping for Pius XIII or Benedict XVII," he said.

Others look to someone like Archbishop Luis Antonio Tagle, of Manila, as a possible John Paul III, he said, while some of the Italians who want to see the papacy returned to one of their number talk about Paul VII.

In any case, any cardinal who's in with a shot of the papacy would do well to do his homework.

Whoever first gains the two-thirds plus one share of the vote and is named pope won't have long to think about it.

Once all the votes are counted, the dean of the College of Cardinals will ask the newly elected head of the church on the spot if he accepts the role and what he wants to be called.

While we wait to hear, we can be sure of only one thing, according to Melloni: the new pope won't be called Peter.

This is out of respect for the first St. Peter, the Apostle -- but perhaps also reflects a centuries' old prophecy that a Peter II will be the very last pope to serve.

CNN's Hada Messia contributed to this report.

And a list of possible names:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Papal_name
 
Throwing stones ...

Speculation on the name the new Pope will choose:

Re: the "no one likely to choose Peter because of prophecy" bit, well that just demonstrates an ignorance that goes right to the heart of Roman Catholicism itself.

You see, Roman Catholics erroneously believe that fisherman Peter was their "First Pope".

Not only that, but they also erroneously believe that Jesus Himself, as recorded in the ancient texts, basically said and decreed fisherman Peter to be the founder and first leader of Roman Catholicism.

The bit of the ancient texts that Roman Catholicism abuses to its own ends re: Peter, Popedom, legitimacy of Roman Catholicism itself and all that, is this:

Now when Jesus came into the district of Caesarea Philippi, He began asking His disciples, saying, "Who do people say that the Son of Man is?" And they said, "Some say John the Baptist; and others, Elijah; but still others, Jeremiah, or one of the prophets." He said to them, "But who do you say that I am?" And Simon Peter answered and said, "Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God." And Jesus answered and said to him, "Blessed are you, Simon Barjona, because flesh and blood did not reveal this to you, but My Father who is in heaven. And I also say to you that you are Peter, and upon this rock I will build My church; and the gates of Hades shall not overpower it." —Matthew 16:13-18

A quick look at the original language this was translated from will soon reveal the mendacity of Roman Catholicism. It will also show that Jesus wasn't past delivering the odd humorous pun and engaging in word-play.

You see, Jesus didn't actually say "you are peter, and upon this rock I will build my church ..." but rather "you are petrOS, and upon this "petrA" and the better translation would be along the lines of "you are a pebble, a throwing stone, a detached bit of rubble, but upon this bedrock I will build my church ...", with the bedrock being what Peter had just declared about Jesus being the son of the living God, as opposed to Peter himself being what the church would be built upon.

In short, what Jesus basically intimated was "oh look, a foundation rock just came out of a little pebble !".

Yeah, a whole religion shaking world of difference between "petros" and "petra", that's for sure.

Anyhoo, back to "the prophecy" re: "the last pope".

Well it reads:

In persecutione extrema S.R.E. sedebit.
Petrus Romanus, qui pascet oves in multis tribulationibus, quibus transactis civitas septicollis diruetur, & judex tremendus judicabit populum suum. Finis.

and is roughly translated as:

In the final persecution of the Holy Roman Church, there will sit [i.e., as bishop].
Peter the Roman, who will pasture his sheep in many tribulations, and when these things are finished, the city of seven hills [i.e. Rome] will be destroyed, and the dreadful judge will judge his people. The End

Yes, there is no doubt that "petrus" can be translated as "Peter" and that it is a commonly accepted translation.

But does "petrus" always mean "peter" and does "peter" always mean "peter". Names have meanings, yes ?

For example, "David" can mean "beloved".

So, if Malachi wrote something along the lines of "Beloved Roman" re: the last pope rather than "Petrus Romanus", would the Roman Catholics be rightfully worried about a Pope named Dave, especially if he was from one of the countries that made up the former Roman Empire ? :D

Soooo, my point is that it is folly to be thinking that "the last pope" HAS to have (or take upon himself) the literal name of "Peter" in order to be the fulfilment of Malachi's prophecy.

It could be fulfilled simply by his name or crest or whatever having something to do with stones or rock ... or the "petra" a certain "petros" said long ago about Jesus !

I for one am looking forward to how it ends up getting fulfilled and I reckon that part of the reason Eggs Benedict stepped down is because he too is interested to see how it gets fulfilled.

... trouble is though, according to some, there is room in the "prophecy" for any number of popes to come and go between "111" and "112".

So, we might be waiting a while yet.

regarDS
 
Back
Top