If WE were the Producers of Big Brother next year… what would WE do to make the show better?…

[Mr Stickyfingers]

…I’d like to put all the Producers of Big Brother / I’m a Celebrity get me out of here / Survivor / Farmer wants a fuck and all the other ‘Reality’ shows put on the show to show them how debasing / humiliating / soul draining it is to be in the house with their (mostly) stupid childish tasks / fake ‘showmances’ and favouritisms towards certain favourite housemates… to feel for themselves how awful they feel when being so badly manipulated just for stupid ratings…

…when we first heard that Big Brother was coming back to Channel 10 it was as if the Pearly Gates of Heaven had opened up and that our once cherished show had done the full circle and returned home to it’s original maker… thank God!…

…”thank fuck it’s coming back to Channel 10…they’ll give us back our favourite show back of how it SHOULD be!”…

…”it’s going to be a trip down memory lane… I can’t wait!”…

…”they’re going back to their origins!… they will make the show great again!”…

…”who is going to be the host?… ANYONE besides that racist wooden dummy Sonia Kruger!… what was that?… it’s going to be Mel Tracina?…. I LOVE her!… she will be great!”…

…as it turned out… Mel Tracina is the one redeeming feature of this season… the greatest discovery Channel 10 has ever had… she’s PERFECT fof the job… the fact that when she’s on the ‘Cheap Seats’ reporting on nothing but all of the ‘REALITY’ shows and the abundant exuberance that she shows towards the shows she loves makes her the perfect host for Big Brother…

…as I’ve said before… “keep Mel Tracina and utilise her talents at every opportunity… she needs to be used to her full potential as the perfect host”… they are not using her to her best potential… she is more than capable to do so much more better things… she doesn’t get enough air time… she should be the ‘glue’ that holds the whole show together… in the immortal words of Tim… “DO YOU HEAR THAT TULLY CHANNEL 10?”…

…seriously Channel 10 trolls… if you’re actually bothering to read any of these threads… please take note of the things these people are saying and the Poll above and take to heart what these brilliant posters above are saying… they know their stuff… they are your avid fans… they know better… LISTEN TO THEM!… if you don’t… Big Brother will sink faster than the Titanic and all of the Russian ships in the Black Sea together… it’s your move… cheers.

 

[T.R.]

I literally have zero excitement for another season next year. I'm over it. I wouldn't be surprised if things were just repeated the same next year: the 4-week season, showmances, the favouritism, Dreamworld riders talking to the housemates etc. The housemates were itching to leave after week 1. How could Week 3 have all the life sucked out of it already? This is Week 3! Ridiculous.

The only thing I am looking forward to next year is the reboot of The Traitors with Gretel hosting. I love Gretel to bits. She always delivers.

Anyway, as I said, I am over Big Brother. At least I won't be wasting my time waiting all year being excited about something that is not going to deliver like I did this year.

 

[hisensewashingmachine]

I literally have zero excitement for another season next year. I'm over it. I wouldn't be surprised if things were just repeated the same next year: the 4-week season, showmances, the favouritism, Dreamworld riders talking to the housemates etc. The housemates were itching to leave after week 1. How could Week 3 have all the life sucked out of it already? This is Week 3! Ridiculous.

The only thing I am looking forward to next year is the reboot of The Traitors with Gretel hosting. I love Gretel to bits. She always delivers.

Anyway, as I said, I am over Big Brother. At least I won't be wasting my time waiting all year being excited about something that is not going to deliver like I did this year.

My theory is

Jan - I’m a Celeb
Feb-May - Survivor Au
June-Aug - Big Brother
Oct-Nov - Traitors

TV Black Box has said BBAU17 won’t be summer filler which means it likely is the Q2 show after Survivor and Traitors will be the Q4 ratings fighter for 10.

 

[Hunter's_Mckay]

You forgot Masterchef. That will start in late April once Survivor or maybe mid May if they run Traitors before it. So BB at the earliest would be late July or early Aug and that relies on TAR being moved later which may not happen either.

 

[Matty492]

Traitors can run at the same time as either Survivor or TAR. as all three only run over 1 - 3 nights a week
MasterChef and BB both run over 5/ 6 nights.
I think BB will be at the same time just start in October or maybe late September.

 

[Brekkie]

My theory is

Jan - I’m a Celeb
Feb-May - Survivor Au
June-Aug - Big Brother
Oct-Nov - Traitors

TV Black Box has said BBAU17 won’t be summer filler which means it likely is the Q2 show after Survivor and Traitors will be the Q4 ratings fighter for 10.

More likely to be:
mid-Jan: I'm a Celeb
Feb: Survivor AU
mid-Apr: The Traitors
mid-May: Masterchef
mid-Aug: Amazing Race
Oct/Nov: Big Brother

I'd say the earliest they might bring BB to the table is immediately after Masterchef but can't see it returning t it's April slot. It's done well but not well enough to bump Masterchef.

As most of us have said all along they really should have held BB over to February and then pushed Survivor back to mid-year but 10 will do everything they can to prioritise Survivor next year to try and not make axing JLP look like the worst decision i the history of TV.

 

[kamui]

some here kept trotting out the conspiracy theory narrative

Lack of transparency is not a conspiracy theory and the fact that a lack of transparency gives the production room to manipulate things isn't a conspiracy theory either.

Thinking that people here are convinced that they've held Michael at gunpoint and that they wouldn't accept any other explanation is a conspiracy theory though.

 

[SoftKitty]

Lack of transparency is not a conspiracy theory

Of course not. That’s been evident throughout the series.

…and the fact that a lack of transparency gives the production room to manipulate things isn't a conspiracy theory either.

Unless there’s irrefutable proof of that happening, that is a conspiracy theory.

Thinking that people here are convinced that they've held Michael at gunpoint and that they wouldn't accept any other explanation is a conspiracy theory though.

There were people in the live thread who after Michael’s HoH nomination video was posted still didn’t think he actually selected Holly.

 

[kamui]

Unless there’s irrefutable proof of that happening, that is a conspiracy theory.

Re-read what I've said: "the fact that a lack of transparency gives the production room to manipulate things isn't a conspiracy theory either". This sentence needs to be wrong so that it can even be considered to be a conspiracy theory. So where is your proof that this sentence is wrong?

There is none. Lack of transparency gives the production room to manipulate things. That's a fact. Some stuff that people speculate about might not be true, but it doesn't negate the sentence that "It's not a conspiracy theory to say that lack of transparency gives the production room to manipulate things." That fact is still a fact.

It's even a fact when the manipulation indeed didn't happen. If I would make a poll here "You decide. Should I have pussy or dick tonight?" and not show any results whatsoever, it gives me room to manipulate things. That's a fact. When people vote for dick and I happily accept that result, I wouldn't have to manipulate things in my favor. But it's still a fact that I had the room to do so.

We know - both for Big Brother and other reality shows - that these things generally happen. So if we point out that there is a vacuum were these things can happen, we don't need irrefutable proof for that. Where is your irrefutable proof that it cannot happen?

There were people in the live thread who after Michael’s HoH nomination video was posted still didn’t think he actually selected Holly.

When people say "they think", it doesn't mean "I'm 100% convinced that this is exactly how things happened and nobody can convince me otherwise". It means that there is a lack transparency. In this case specifically, it didn't show the moment when Michael was briefed. This opens the possibility that he got additional instructions or leading questions. How is this video proof that none of this happened? It's not, because that part is missing.

And I still stand by my point: I don't think you'll find any person that will post here and say "Yes, I fully believe that Michael was told to pick Holly and I will not accept any other explanation." You'll only find people who say "We didn't see what they asked Michael. So it's possible that they've done this or that."

 

[Melore]

I would get new producers.