Game Eviction Prediction - Week 1

Who is going on Sunday?

  • Jane

    Votes: 11 9.7%

  • Michael

    Votes: 58 51.3%

  • Holly

    Votes: 44 38.9%
  • Total voters
    113
Absolutely - she's an all time great housemate.

Would love to know where Holly placed in the viewer vote on attractiveness - bet it was mid-table at best.
 
TheOneGHOST said:
One of my gripes about this season is they didn't bring back Vote to Evict from the original seasons. Not sure why they stuck to Vote to Save.
Click to expand...
Vote to save is softer and more in line with modern times and not hurting or offending anyone. Vote to evict could be perceived as negative. Just a thought.

They should bring back the vote to evict and to save and do the merges again.
 
As I've said in another thread, with vote to save, the most popular HM wins. With vote to evict, the least hated wins, quite often someone hiding under the radar. Ben, Peter and Trevor didn't win for being the most popular. If a HM is divisive, both loved and hated by viewers, then hatred wins in a vote to evict such as with Sara-Marie. If that first season had vote to save instead, then she would have won. Also the season 5 results may have been different; I don't think the twins would have won.

There have often been complaints about little-known HMs winning and popular ones being kicked off. Vote to save therefore generally produces more satisfying results for the viewers. However, it can be argued that a HM who is hated as well as loved doesn't necessarily deserve the win. If Sara-Marie had won first season, or Paul in season 4, a lot of viewers would have been angry at the show and turned off in disgust. Therefore, perhaps both the vote to save and evict combo is the ideal, but the current system of vote to save is still better than vote to evict.
 
Jane feels the least divisive, Holly and Michael would have haters but also supporters. But just one vote per person and probably cast early in the week anyway feels like it counts for less, basically it doesn’t matter what is shown after most have casted their votes. It should be Michael or Holly but will probably be Jane.

This is assuming it’s based solely on the votes via the app.
 
jessy_girl said:
Jane feels the least divisive, Holly and Michael would have haters but also supporters. But just one vote per person and probably cast early in the week anyway feels like it counts for less, basically it doesn’t matter what is shown after most have casted their votes. It should be Michael or Holly but will probably be Jane.

This is assuming it’s based solely on the votes via the app.
Click to expand...
It won't be Jane, on Facebook and Instagram, the comments on every post about the eviction are people saying they saved her.
 
Michael to go tonight, that's my hunch!
Holly is polarising, but she probably has a little more people wanting to save her than the alternative.
I would like to see more of Jane in the house, despite whatever views she has about Trump.
 
I just saw the previous daily show (NZ is a day behind). Holly was talking about leaving of her own volition I think. I'm not sure but she might just announce that she is choosing to be evicted regardless of the results.
 
The Rusty Viewer said:
As I've said in another thread, with vote to save, the most popular HM wins. With vote to evict, the least hated wins, quite often someone hiding under the radar. Ben, Peter and Trevor didn't win for being the most popular. If a HM is divisive, both loved and hated by viewers, then hatred wins in a vote to evict such as with Sara-Marie. If that first season had vote to save instead, then she would have won. Also the season 5 results may have been different; I don't think the twins would have won.

There have often been complaints about little-known HMs winning and popular ones being kicked off. Vote to save therefore generally produces more satisfying results for the viewers. However, it can be argued that a HM who is hated as well as loved doesn't necessarily deserve the win. If Sara-Marie had won first season, or Paul in season 4, a lot of viewers would have been angry at the show and turned off in disgust. Therefore, perhaps both the vote to save and evict combo is the ideal, but the current system of vote to save is still better than vote to evict.
Click to expand...

I agree with this. The main downside with Vote to Save is that quieter HMs are less likely to get save votes and could get eliminated before they really get a chance to shine. e.g. if Emily were up against Holly and Michael this week she would be out the door tonight. In Vote to Evict one of the others would. Producers would undoubtedly prefer Emily go though.
 
I changed my vote to Michael, I think Holly is getting a bit unfairly shitted on TBH I'd like to see if she perhaps can get a bit of a redemption/underdog arc happening with a bit more time, at least another week. Then maybe if Colin is up we can boot him out and there goes the 'ITS A FAKE SHOWMAAAANCE' angle. lol.
 
I think Michael goes.
Jane seems more popular with the people in the crowd that they have shown, and also online. And Holly seems to also getting some support from the people online that don't like the views of Michael and Jane. I don't see many people going lets save Michael.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top