People of that degree should be avoided. But the term influencer is thrown around a bit too easily IMO. But you do raise a good point tho that I do agree with.The problem with influencers is if they have (say)100k followers they have a huge potential voting advantage when it comes to evictions and ultimately winning. Sisters from Ch7 spring to mind.
But if they’re doing their job right a potential 100k strong army should be irrelevant either way… They’re either going to charm the pants off everyone or eventually reveal a part of themselves that’s not shown on social media.The problem with influencers is if they have (say)100k followers they have a huge potential voting advantage when it comes to evictions and ultimately winning. Sisters from Ch7 spring to mind.
At the end of the day it’s doesn’t matter if someone has 100K or 10 the haters are going to hate. Didn’t Fardia cop shit for having something like 30K on TikTok for her makeup tutorials?People of that degree should be avoided. But the term influencer is thrown around a bit too easily IMO. But you do raise a good point tho that I do agree with.
If I had to guess however, TEN are likely to take this a bit more seriously than anyone will say that will. I’ve kind of been doubting them a bit as of late, but nothing is set in stone yet.
Also that media spy commenter who claims the show is going to be closer to ten weeks, I looked at their previous posts and they seem to be reputable. They’ve posted correct leaked information about other shows.
Well yes, returning to the old format with feed(s) will definitely give better insights than either Nine or Seven's version. But as I've said many, many times before I just don't think they should cast anyone with a big social media presence. Let's have a level playing field.But if they’re doing their job right a potential 100k strong army should be irrelevant either way… They’re either going to charm the pants off everyone or eventually reveal a part of themselves that’s not shown on social media.
Trying to compare a live format with feeds to the heavily edited 7 series is like comparing apples to oranges. It’s all the more reason why we need a decent length series in order to truly see what they’re like when the walls come down.
Maybe stick to BB oriented subs? Let me up/down a bunch of comments though.Made the mistake of posting this on Reddit and I’m just getting slaughtered.
Reddit - The heart of the internet
www.reddit.com
I tried but it was deleted due to Karma issues or something like thatMaybe stick to BB oriented subs? Let me up/down a bunch of comments though.
Whilst I agree it doesn't necessarily result in higher votes most HMs have their social media managed during their time on the show. Indeed part of the reason casting people favour them is because they can reach their followers online - and let's be honest for the new BB to succeed it needs to get younger viewers switching from their mobile screens to their TV screens - or at the very least pushing content to them digitally.I do think that having a social media following shouldn't actually affect the voting too much though right? Since HM's are sworn to secrecy and put in lockdown, they'll have no way to rally their own followers to vote for them. If they lose the ability to post on their own social media, most people that don't watch BB won't notice their absence for 2 or 3 months since social media always fills the gaps. Also it's probably unlikely that anyone with a decent following would have a big Australian follower percentage anyway, at least not enough to skew the votes without constantly posting and reminding people.
All of that to say, I agree with those who are saying there probably will be at least a couple influencer types in the house since it's a common job in this day and age.
I hope 10 creates a Bluesky account for it, and doesn't just fall back on toxic Twitter. I've always thought it was a shame BB was ahead of the available tech at the time. Broadband was rare and Twitter would have been a perfect match had it been around in 2001. But forums such as this one definitely stepped up and did the show a huge favour. Even when they were critical of it, they created news and publicity and added to the buzz.That is why a 24/7 live feed is so important- it enables fans to do the work for you and promote the show around the clock.
Remembering back to the Logan twins. I can't remember which one it was now as it was too long ago. One of them came into the salon I work in, to use the solarium - which doesn't exist anymore.
Had time to read that now - excellent piece and not much, if anything, in there I disagree with. The key thing is to let Big Brother be Big Brother rather than make it something it isn't. That doesn't mean it has to be what it was in 2001 because frankly BBAU wasn't the same in 2003, 2006 or 2008 as it was in 2001 either. It just needs to obviously share the same DNA.![]()
How dare they - if anyone is going to slaughter you that's our job!Made the mistake of posting this on Reddit and I’m just getting slaughtered.
Reddit - The heart of the internet
www.reddit.com
Just shared on BeingBigBrother.blog (Tumblr in disguiseplease share. Let’s get this some traction.
Thank youJust shared on BeingBigBrother.blog (Tumblr in disguise) and Bluesky.
I agreed with pretty much everything you wrote, apart from I don't necessarily think BB having a personality is a bad thing. The Leon Murray BB "character" was hands-down my favourite thing about BB8-BB11 – he was hilarious in his own right, but mostly just let the HMs get on with it.
I'll never get why ITV decided to imitate the needy, overbearing "Welcome to my new game in my new house, me me me, do you like playing my game???" character from the 7-era. And very transparently, in the early days of the reboot.
Bring back BB talking in the third person! And bring back "That is all"!