Might just be the difference between alcoholic and non-alcoholic drinks.![]()
So I'm watching a version I got on an old HD, not the new one. Was Coke a sponsor at one time? Cos their beers seem to have labels taken off but water bottles have Pump aswell. (It's all coke owned)
Yeah looks like I was about right. They have a 'Part 2 next Friday' screen up now and they stopped about 5 mins ago (approx 11:10am AEST) at the end of the Double Eviction of Kim and Saxon (Day 57, end of Week 8).Just checking in, ...
I wonder what the intermission point will be, If they get another two weeks done by tomorrow night they'll be past the Double Eviction and I think thats when it was Final 6 one a week until Final 3 and Finale.
I assume there must be another issue, possibly rights related or sponsor related etc. Once they have the vidoes uploading them shouldn't be a problem.Too much or is there another issue?
The show doesn’t pay sponsors. Sponsors paid the show. If you think they’d somehow reject the idea of free advertising you’re kidding meI assume there must be another issue, possibly rights related or sponsor related etc. Once they have the vidoes uploading them shouldn't be a problem.
Its possible that due to sponser changes etc they would have to either blur certain things which would be a huge amount of work or pay the sponsors again.
It can work both ways depending on the product. Also new sponsors may not allow showing related products from other companies.The show doesn’t pay sponsors. Sponsors paid the show. If you think they’d somehow reject the idea of free advertising you’re kidding me![]()
I believe it comes down to trademark protection, if their trademark is being used outside of the original parameters of their sponsorship deal, Coke could hypothetically sue for trademark infringement. Trademark law is highly performative to my knowledge, if you don’t protect your trademark then you lose it.If you think they’d somehow reject the idea of free advertising you’re kidding me![]()
Kinda makes sense to me.It also seemed unclear whether anything past 2004 will go up either (as we suspected).
They have none at the moment.It can work both ways depending on the product. Also new sponsors may not allow showing related products from other companies.
Again sponsors aren’t going to turn away free advertising. BB is also not using sponsors in a way that would violate any trademarks. Product placement is purely for advertising purposes.I believe it comes down to trademark protection, if their trademark is being used outside of the original parameters of their sponsorship deal, Coke could hypothetically sue for trademark infringement. Trademark law is highly performative to my knowledge, if you don’t protect your trademark then you lose it.
I doubt that. They would already have some lined up for the new season.They have none at the moment.
Maybe but they would have no say at this momentI doubt that. They would already have some lined up for the new season.
They actually will send a cease and decide if their logos and branding is used without their consultation or the branding is old. Happens all the time. There is “free advertising” yes but some brands actually don’t want it especielly when it’s 20+ years oldThey have none at the moment.
Again sponsors aren’t going to turn away free advertising. BB is also not using sponsors in a way that would violate any trademarks. Product placement is purely for advertising purposes.
Most people think movies/TV show using very obvious dupes of branded products/services has to do with needing to pay to use the trademark but actually it’s the other way around where if the brand isn’t paying to be featured the show/movie isn’t going to give them free advertising.
Again another reason why they’re putting this up on YouTube and not 10 Play. If sponsors were actually an issue here they wouldn’t be streaming the series.They actually will send a cease and decide if their logos and branding is used without their consultation or the branding is old. Happens all the time. There is “free advertising” yes but some brands actually don’t want it especielly when it’s 20+ years old
They also won’t turn away a lawsuit, if you use any trademark device commercially without permission it’s against the law.Again sponsors aren’t going to turn away free advertising.
Yes they very much are an issue. You have to licence any trademark you want to include.Trademarks wouldn't be an issue.