-
Welcome to the discussion forums. To get posting, register an account.
Rewatch BBAU Rewatch
- Thread starter Zcsund1234
- Start date
James T
Your eviction prediction priestessā¢
If you told anyone in 2005 that Constance would end up having the most notoriety out of the bunch in 20 years time, youād be called crazyWatching 2005 at the moment, just printed this old thing out to keep track as we watch hereI know I can just google who wins but it's no fun lol
Shackles
The pen is mightier than the sword.
I'm watching the 2005 season for the first time to see what the fuss is about. Up to day 53 with the new intruders coming in (Heath seemed creepy but maybe he'll change). It's a really boring season tbh, and I know it's a hugely unpopular opinion.
The male housemates (maybe besides Tim) are boring, unlikable immature meatheads and the females are just the same if maybe slightly less boring. I don't get Christie? Honestly I only like Vesna. I wanted Rachel to stay longer. Vesna is hilarious and her popularity was justified as she's the only good thing from that season. Gianna was awesome too until they booted her out so quickly! I also wanted to see more of Constance.
2005 is season that could've been alright if some housemates weren't kicked out very early!
The male housemates (maybe besides Tim) are boring, unlikable immature meatheads and the females are just the same if maybe slightly less boring. I don't get Christie? Honestly I only like Vesna. I wanted Rachel to stay longer. Vesna is hilarious and her popularity was justified as she's the only good thing from that season. Gianna was awesome too until they booted her out so quickly! I also wanted to see more of Constance.
2005 is season that could've been alright if some housemates weren't kicked out very early!
Hunter's_Mckay
Well-Known Member
I think that group of Angela, Dean, Constance and Nelson which was forming in week 1 could have been the nastiest group ever seen on the show if they had lasted longer TBH. Nelson especially just seemed awful in every way.
RandomMacFive
Living in the round house
I'm watching 2003 for the first time and one thing I find interesting is that the tasks they do don't seem to matter to the viewer? They will be doing a task for two daily show's and then it will be mentioned by Mike what they are doing. The square was doing something with clay and it wasn't mentioned at all until many episodes later when the round house did it. And even then the outcome of the clay task wasn't mentioned at all.
Anyone know why they did that? Did they think the tasks weren't important enough for the viewer?
Anyone know why they did that? Did they think the tasks weren't important enough for the viewer?