Skip to main content

BB27 USA - starts 10 July

Get of the bandwagon.

Using your same logic, Kaitlyn in BB20 wasn't responsible for failing to win re-entry into the game by completing the puzzle - which is a ridiculous stance. From a purely competition standpoint, saying that a HG has no responsibility for losing a competition is ridiculous when they had every opportunity to win.
 
She failed hard at the competition and at one point,

She might have not been able to complete a task within a certain timeframe, but Big Brother is not about winning a competition. It's about convincing your fellow housemates to keep you in the house. That's what's different from Kaitlyn. She lost the social aspect and merely had a second chance. I don't think anyone would have complained if Rachel was nominated because of not completing the task.

With Rachel not even being at the end of the chain and getting evicted because she failed to understand the competition or whatever and thus not being able to do the possible, it actually makes it worse than her being towards the end of the chain and getting evicted because she wasn't able to do the impossible.
 
As I said, I'm talking about her losing the competition itself. I originally said that the twist component of it still sucks. I'm not defending that.

But its her own fault she lost at that stage with that time limit - regardless of whether the consequence was elimination, just being a Have-Not, or none at all. Her performance was laughably bad.
 
Get of the bandwagon.

Using your same logic, Kaitlyn in BB20 wasn't responsible for failing to win re-entry into the game by completing the puzzle - which is a ridiculous stance. From a purely competition standpoint, saying that a HG has no responsibility for losing a competition is ridiculous when they had every opportunity to win.
No I’m not. Kaitlyn failed her individual comp for an extra chance at playing after being voted out. Rachel lost a comp and was eliminated. Huge difference.
 
Back
Top