Skip to main content

2014 Media Articles Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sonia Kruger speaks out against the stigma surrounding IVF and late parenthood
TV and Radio

Article%20Lead%20-%20narrow6134005310iq42image.related.articleLeadNarrow.353x0.10iqad.png1411695468093.jpg-300x0.jpg

Sonia Kruger: "When someone asks me a question I answer it as honestly as I can." Photo: Anu Kumar
Within a day, possibly only hours, of revealing she was pregnant, TV personality Sonia Kruger had intimate details of her personal life splashed all over newspapers and the internet in a manner that might make even an over-sharing celebrity wince.
Not that staying silent was an option. For the past fortnight, Kruger's baby bump has been evident beneath the va-va-voom outfits she wears as host of Big Brother. By the time the show wraps, her bump will be the size of a watermelon.
Nor would it be the straight-shooting Kruger's style to not be frank and honest about herself.
Article%20Lead%20-%20narrow6134005310iq48image.related.articleLeadNarrow.353x0.10iqad.png1411695467873.jpg-300x0.jpg

Friendly and unpretentious: Rosa's Kitchen was bustling with the Friday working-lunch crowd. Photo: Anu Kumar
"I've never lied," says the gregarious Kruger, who looks at least 10 years younger than her 49 years, over lunch at Rosa's Kitchen. "When someone asks me a question I answer it as honestly as I can. More importantly, it's important to me to not mislead women out there as if it was some kind of miracle baby," she says; a thinly veiled riposte to Women's Weekly magazine, which plastered the line "My Miracle Pregnancy ..." on its cover after Kruger announced her pregnancy at the end of her first trimester.
Advertisement
"It's science, not a miracle," says Kruger. "Unfortunately, that (headline) is really misleading to women. Thirty years ago when IVF first came up people were very suspicious about it. Questions about ethics and morality all came up. If you look at how common it is now, people don't bat an eyelid."
A lunch time drink is off the agenda and Kruger has a plane to catch, so without hesitation we take up the waitress' suggestion of an antipasto platter (pork and fennel sausage, Mortadella, kohlrabi, bean salad, pecorino, cauliflower fritter, frittata and pickled fennel), fried calamari and stuffed sardines. The generously sized and flavoursome dishes arrive quickly. The venue is bustling with the Friday working-lunch crowd and as befits the setting the food is friendly and unpretentious.
Article%20Lead%20-%20narrow6134005310iq3wimage.related.articleLeadNarrow.353x0.10iqad.png1411695467963.jpg-300x0.jpg

Small antipasto, stuffed sardines and calamari with parsley salt at Rosa's Kitchen. Photo: Anu Kumar
Though TV has come a long way since the days of I Love Lucy, when the word "expectant" was considered safer than "pregnant", baby bumps are still notable for their scarcity on screen. A decade ago, baby bumps – be they real, imagined or a trick of a camera lens – were tabloid fodder. But these days, it's the IVF ordeals of TV personalities, such as comedienne Mary Coustas and reporter Leila McKinnon or at the other end of the popular culture spectrum the so-called Octomom, that seem to capture the public's attention.
For her part, Kruger is resolute about shining a light on IVF and late parenthood, if only to take away some of the stigma.
"I hate disappointing people. I'd be very disappointed (not talking frankly), I'd want to know more. Coming from that side of the fence of being the person asking the questions I also want to be as honest and open as possible unless I feel there's some danger in doing that."
Thebill-300x0.jpg

The bill, please.
A large part of Kruger's appeal and popularity is her unfiltered and often cheeky spontaneity on live TV. Her first breakthrough was as Tina Sparkle in Baz Luhrmann's 1992 musical film Strictly Ballroom. But she fast discovered that dramatic roles, crying-on-command and pre-rehearsed lines weren't for her.
She learned the ropes of TV on the afternoon kid's show Wonder World, before being offered the co-hosting duties of the breakout, family-friendly competition show Dancing With The Stars.

She shone as the cheeky loose cannon to Daryl Somers' dapper host, gently ribbing contestants and lobbing inspired puns that are likely to have had the hands of network censors hovering over the mute button for many an hour.
Unbeknownst to many, Kruger had been approached a few years before Dancing With The Stars to host the then-unknown reality show that would change the face of local TV, Big Brother.

Tim Clucas, then an executive at Ten, contacted Kruger and suggested she audition. "He said, 'You don't understand, this show is going to be really big'." But Kruger wasn't convinced and didn't turn up to do the screen test. "Tim called me and he wasn't happy."
Busy with Dancing With The Stars she didn't look back, she says, but began to wonder if "the universe is trying to tell me something" when three years ago, Kruger having now decamped to Nine, the network made the surprise decision to revive the show, which Ten axed in 2008 in the face of declining audiences and a series of damaging public scandals.
"I thought long and hard about doing it," says Kruger, who was so nervous in the lead-up to the first episode "I started thinking of ways to fake my own death to get out of it".
She recalls the night early in the first season when a producer instructed her to throw to the house and talk to Michael, "the peacemaker".
"So I started thinking he's making peace, there must have been a huge fight in the house. Wow. What went down for Michael to now play the role of peacemaker?" says Kruger in her TV presenter voice. "And (the producer talking through the ear-piece) went 'pizza maker, he's making pizzas'." I burst out laughing and I'm sure the audience thought 'what is she laughing about?'.
"Now I'm a lot more comfortable with where we're going, what we're doing, who's talking in my ear, I don't have to think about any of that now."
The most significant change that Nine brought to the Big Brother format was to make it a prime-time show that would appeal to a young-adult audience, distancing it from the smutty and voyeuristic scandals for which its earlier incarnation was known.
Nonetheless, it is a show that tends to be publicly judged by people who don't watch it at the expense of its loyal followers who understand the intricacies of the Survivor-type competition – to be the last person evicted from the house and claim the $250,000 cash prize – and who relate to the dozen contestants isolated for months on end in the fish-bowl house.
The local version of the show, Kruger contends, is a real-life soap opera. "It's the romance, the drama, the conflict, all that stuff becomes compelling after a while."
To the kids at home, the contestants – invariably they're a motley bunch that includes a handful of desirable young men and women, an oddball, an extrovert with narcissistic tendencies, a mysterious dark horse, etc – are larger-than-life characters whose sequestered situation they can relate to.
"I think viewers put themselves into their situation. I know I have. If I went into the house, how would people in the outside world see me; would they like me, would they hate me?"
And while some contestants, Kruger believes, are driven by the hope of building a career in the media, the majority aren't.
"I think why so many of them go onto have radio careers is because the people who are conversationalists in the house stand out and it's a natural progression to go into radio. They don't necessarily go into a breakfast slot in Sydney or Melbourne, but they get a foot in the door if they have natural talent. It's not that way for everyone. We've had interesting people in the house – Tim Dormer (winner of the 2013 series) was a strange cat who liked to stir the pot – but that's just him. Those people have meant that we don't just get the show ponies. The average age this year is 27, in the past it was 23. It's about their life experiences."
Kruger's professional plans beyond the Big Brother finale are unclear. "I imagine that three months is the norm in terms of maternity leave," she says, before relating a characteristically wise-ass anecdote about a colleague who boasted about how awesome her network was about taking-off time after having a baby. "I'll probably get the weekend off," her friend said.
"I guess the thing is we have it a lot better than most working mums."


Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/entertainment/tv-and-radio/sonia-kruger-speaks-out-against-the-stigma-surrounding-ivf-and-late-parenthood-20140920-10iqad.html#ixzz3ERlK5ukZ
 
'Don't call my baby a miracle': Sonia Kruger speaks out about her IVF pregnancy process being trivialised
By Alex Lazcano for Daily Mail Australia

Published: 17:25 AEST, 27 September 2014 | Updated: 18:43 AEST, 27 September 2014


  • She announced her pregnancy on Instagram and her baby bump is growing in the spotlight while she hosts Big Brother.

    While Sonia Kruger is ecstatic about falling pregnant, she by no means counts the pregnancy a miracle.

    The fashionable 49-year-old spoke out referring to a Australian Women's Weekly cover line that read, 'My Miracle Pregnancy.'

    1411798496700_wps_5_Sonia_Kruger_with_a_Big_B.jpg


    +5
    The newest Big Brother housemate: Sonia Kruger is overjoyed at her pregnancy but feels it is important to inform other women about going through IVF after the age of 40

    The Big Brother host felt it was important to express her feelings about the story.

    'It's important to me to not mislead women out there as if it was some kind of miracle baby,' she told Sydney Morning Herald.

    'It's science, not a miracle,' says Kruger. 'Unfortunately, that (headline) is really misleading to women. Thirty years ago when IVF first came up people were very suspicious about it. Questions about ethics and morality all came up. If you look at how common it is now, people don't bat an eyelid.'

    But the television personality's pregnancy was far from straight forward, she and her partner Craig McPherson had been trying to conceive a child for years unsuccessfully.

    1411800810798_wps_9_Australian_Women_s_weekly.jpg


    +5
    Not a miracle: The headline on Australia's Women's Weekly that frustrated Sonia, she does not see her pregnancy as a miracle but a product of science

    1411798589685_wps_6_Sonia_Kruger_instagram.jpg


    +5
    Not a miracle: 'It's important to me to not mislead women out there as if it was some kind of miracle baby,' she said referring to the long journey she went through to finally fall pregnant

    'We did conceive naturally several times and I miscarried on a couple of occasions,' she told The Australian Women's Weekly in 2012.

    'We tried IVF and it wasn't successful. The doctors were very clear with me too, that for women over the age of 45, which was the age we attempted IVF, the success rate is zero.'


    Having little information available to her about late parenthood and IVF she felt she needed to share her experiences and also inform others.

    She revealed she hated disappointing people and wanted to speak frankly about her experience and also give others information on it, and be honest and open.

    The presenter is aware of the issues she faces as an older mother to be.

    Royal Women's Hospital maternity service clinical director Mark Umstad told the Herald Sun that pregnancy for all older women there is an increased risk of developing high blood pressure, placental insufficiency meaning the baby does not get as many nutrients and labours can be longer and more difficult.

    'These risks can all be mitigated. If the pregnancy is well managed and monitored throughout most women do extremely well.'

    1411798859892_wps_16_Sonia_Kruger_makes_openin.jpg



    My lovely baby bump: Sonia Kruger jokes with the housemates on the launch of Big Brother about her growing baby belly

    In the interview Sonia also revealed she may have taken Big Brother from strength to strength on Channel Nine but she wasn't always interested in the gig as a host of the format.

    The blonde bombshell revealed that an executive at Channel 10 had suggested she audition for the gig that was eventually held by Gretel Killeen.

    She admitted that she wasn't convinced the show or the hosting job was a good fit so she didn't even bother going to the screen test.

    Now hosting her second year of Big Brother on Channel Nine she feels like she's found her rhythm and an audience.

    1411801042120_wps_10_Sonia_Kruger_makes_openin.jpg



    Big Brother bump: Sonia's growing belly was in full view in the bright pink gown she wore on the opening night of the show



    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbi...gnancy-process-trivialised.html#ixzz3EVyLIRGa
 
So, they're writing their OWN articles and not regurgitating the NINE press release?

Hold the front page! ;)
 
Big Brother is now a dull TV show
590508-75faae5e-4516-11e4-9a65-621dde564580.jpg

Big Brother 2014. Source: Channel 9

IT’S time to go ... Big Brother. The controversial reality series has well and truly had its day — and I speak as an unashamed former fan.
It is just boring. So dull, in fact, that producers have now resorted to employing schoolyard bullying tactics to win back an audience which has grown desensitised to the now predictable array of reality TV stunts. There was nothing clever about what they put poor Gemma Kinghorn through last week. Apparently it’s no longer enough to have contestants (and then the nation) anonymously vote Gemma off the show.
No. Now, live on air, they forced the girl to relive the schoolyard horrors of being chosen last for a team. One by one, the other contestants explained why they preferred another nominated housemate over Gemma. Adding insult to injury, they were then ordered to stand behind the housemate they preferred so poor Gemma was left standing pretty much on her own, humiliated.
Now, Gemma was no angel during her short stint on TV but that doesn’t mean she deserved such a public caning. It was pretty lowbrow stuff. And while the BB house has always been home to bullying, this was the first time that producers have encouraged people to turn on one another purely for the sake of entertainment and all important ratings. The worst part is, the tactics did attract headlines and subsequently more viewers too — if only in the short term.
When Channel 9 bought the franchise, it promised it would be different from the program which had brought us turkey-slapping, mothers and daughters with matching implants and “dancing doonas”. The new BB was going to be smarter, more ethnically diverse and a lot less cruel. Well, the only thing that has changed about BB is its host. And not even quick-witted Sonia Kruger can save BB from what it has become a really, really boring show.
Apart from the horrors of the Gemma-shaming incident, the only thing notable about this year’s BB has been the flatlining ratings.
When I’ve tuned in to the current series I’ve been bored witless by the inane prattle of the young things they’re holding captive in the Gold Coast compound this year. I fell asleep twice during the nomination show.
After all, there’s nothing compelling about people moaning about stolen soft drink cans or complaining that someone’s “fart gags make them want to vom”.
What was once a fascinating TV social experiment, turning everyday folk into megastars (albeit briefly) has now become a parade of desperate attention-seekers hoping to turn a few months of embarrassing themselves on television into thriving media careers.
There have been genuinely talented people discovered through BB but for every Chrissie Swan there are 25 others who do a spread in a men’s magazine, a few nightclub appearances then slip back into obscurity.
BB is not a guaranteed ticket to stardom, particularly now that the people cast are chosen purely as combative eye candy. Far from being from a cross section of society, the BB contestants all look and sound the same — a sea of hair extensions, fake tans and bulging pecs. When these Stepford contestants aren’t lolling about in the sun or mounting each other in the spa they are regaling each other with chat about what they might cook if they were at home and not on a TV show. Yawn.
No one is saying housemates should be debating how they’d tackle the problems in the Middle East or reciting Shakespearean sonnets. It would, however, be great to see someone in the house do more than work on their tan and slag each other off.
I know I am no longer BB’s target demographic. As a mother of three, I deal with enough toilet humour and childish game-playing at home without watching adults do it on TV.
And by the looks of the ratings, it seems the target audience is less than impressed too. Young people today have seen all this kind of stuff before. They’ve been raised on a steady diet of reality TV, so there’s nothing new or exciting in watching people just like themselves pashing each other and talking rubbish. They could get that at the pub on a Saturday night or in their Facebook feeds on any given day.
Perhaps that’s why the producers are desperately trying to find ways to reinvigorate the franchise. But if the only way to regain an audience is through sanctioned bully-boy tactics, then perhaps it is time to evict the producers rather than their tedious housemate pawns.
I, for one, feel that reality television as a whole has lost the plot. Whether it’s cooking, singing, dancing or lolling around in a Queensland house for three months, we have seen it all before.
I would prefer to see the networks spend money creating more quality drama and comedy programs.
Shows like Offspring, The Moodys, Wentworth and Devil’s Playground are proof that Aussie TV can be inspiring, thought-provoking and gripping.
So maybe it is time that we left entertainment to the professionals again and sent the wannabes back to their couches at home where they belong.

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/op...w-a-dull-tv-show/story-fni0ffsx-1227072590534
 
I agree with that article. It has become boring, but the main issue that we have all discussed here is that there is no other content/feeds/updates where we can tune in to see what is really happening in the house. I am surprised that wasn't mentioned in her article.
It has moved so far from the true big brother that it might as well be another Jersey Shore, Kardashian type show.
 
I agree with that article. It has become boring, but the main issue that we have all discussed here is that there is no other content/feeds/updates where we can tune in to see what is really happening in the house. I am surprised that wasn't mentioned in her article.
It has moved so far from the true big brother that it might as well be another Jersey Shore, Kardashian type show.
I agree with it too. It just pisses me off that, take this forum as an example, we are a minority group of diehard fans whom over the years have come up with an endless amount of pages of potential ideas, concepts and ways to improve the current format but it's honestly falling on dead ears. I know Alex M has incorporated a number of things we've suggested here into the show over the last three seasons but it's just not enough. What Channel 9 have done to the format of Big Brother is just beyond ridiculous and unfortunately it can no longer keep running in this direction. Disappointing.
 
Blah blah blah. So sick of reading whinging articles from faux-journalists who probably didn't like BB to start with. Fuck off with you. Seriously. What do you think BB is, and has always been about?

Problem is, it used to be fine to watch people get thrown in who have to suddenly live together is close confines and watch the conversations and the drama naturally created by that situation. Sure, not every conversation is going to be comedy gold or solving the problems of the universe. That's life, that's real, and the beauty of it is in the nuance of that interaction and voyeuristically watching the laughter, tears, meltdowns etc that come along with that.

Now though, some viewers and people like that in the article above have become fucking LAZY and don't want to watch real interaction, don't want to see relationships develop, change, explode etc. They want to be handed their entertainment NOW NOW NOW like some scripted sideshow instead of reality. This is exactly what I DON'T want BB to become. I think that person should go back to watching the Kardashians if that's what they prefer because they have themselves confused about reality.. on one hand you complain about the stunts they've pulled for ratings and controversy then also complain about the normal house conversations. I think you need to rethink.. and stop generalising young people because they actually DO get it, unlike yourself..

I think we've all complained about some of the decisions Channel 9 have made, but the large majority of the complaints have been because we want to see MORE of the natural conversations, MORE of the everyday activities and MORE content to allow us to really see who these housemates are. The best shows have been where we see this! We're not fucking stupid and we don't need or want to be spoon-fed a fabricated storyline like that person seems to want because little diddums was bored..

If you don't appreciate the beauty of actual reality tv then don't write about it because you just don't get it.
I for one want BB to keep coming back, because I love it. So screw you Herald Sun.
 
Blah blah blah. So sick of reading whinging articles from faux-journalists who probably didn't like BB to start with. Fuck off with you. Seriously. What do you think BB is, and has always been about?

Problem is, it used to be fine to watch people get thrown in who have to suddenly live together is close confines and watch the conversations and the drama naturally created by that situation. Sure, not every conversation is going to be comedy gold or solving the problems of the universe. That's life, that's real, and the beauty of it is in the nuance of that interaction and voyeuristically watching the laughter, tears, meltdowns etc that come along with that.

Now though, some viewers and people like that in the article above have become fucking LAZY and don't want to watch real interaction, don't want to see relationships develop, change, explode etc. They want to be handed their entertainment NOW NOW NOW like some scripted sideshow instead of reality. This is exactly what I DON'T want BB to become. I think that person should go back to watching the Kardashians if that's what they prefer because they have themselves confused about reality.. on one hand you complain about the stunts they've pulled for ratings and controversy then also complain about the normal house conversations. I think you need to rethink.. and stop generalising young people because they actually DO get it, unlike yourself..

I think we've all complained about some of the decisions Channel 9 have made, but the large majority of the complaints have been because we want to see MORE of the natural conversations, MORE of the everyday activities and MORE content to allow us to really see who these housemates are. The best shows have been where we see this! We're not fucking stupid and we don't need or want to be spoon-fed a fabricated storyline like that person seems to want because little diddums was bored..

If you don't appreciate the beauty of actual reality tv then don't write about it because you just don't get it.
I for one want BB to keep coming back, because I love it. So screw you Herald Sun.

:thumbsup: I am just as fed up as you are. Very good post :thumbsup:
 
Ryan on Skye:

I think Skye needs to go easier on the prunes.

Perhaps the prunes are leaching colour, and that is why Skye's skin looks like it does
 
Switzerland is a good description for Jason.[DOUBLEPOST=1411878569][/DOUBLEPOST]
So they now even have journalists going in to ask the housemates questions, what a joke this show has become.

I reckon Big brother probably asked the questions.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top