Episode Day 4 Daily Show and Nominations - 12/11/2025

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm not sure who to save.

I have problems on all three.

Very simply, Jane is the Trump lover, Michael is about 'wokeness' and Holly is part of a love story forming.

All three problems are turnoffs for me.

Even if it was a vote to evict format, I would struggle to get a vote.

Please convince me on who to use my one vote to save on.
Michael is funny even if you dont agree with his views, he loves stiring trouble and does it in a non bully way, even conor said he is ok with how Michael trolls him

Holly is full of herself, stuck up, dumb, cant understand things, a narcisist

Jane is nice and has some odd views that many wouldnt agree with too like Michael but to me, Michael is the one providing me the most enetertainment, so I voted him to save regardless of his views on shit that doesnt impact me
 
TBH, I would rather BB kept that detail secret.

So music-wise, much better tonight, HOWEVER, specifically for the nomination tally board and eviction voting segments can production PLEASE use a suitable underscore BB theme mix 🥺.
I would even be fine if they just use the OG Diary Room Mix theme..... its different, but just use the start on loop.
 
Jane and Michael being super racist just moments after being nominated

 
Jane and Michael being super racist just moments after being nominated


Looks like I’m saving Holly now… Welp
 
Michael just said.
"At the end of the day we are a scripted show to a certain degree"

I wonder how scripted it is.
Yes, he alluded to the fact that the free voting can (and probably will be) rigged. Then they cut the camera.

It's exactly what I've brought up here:
 
Hopefully 10 and Endemol Shine are onto that and other abuses of the voting process.
They don't care.

We don't even have a guarantee that the votes do anything.

In Australia if the voting is free, you don't have to actually follow it. The producers can evict whoever they want.

Back in the old days they had independent auditors checking the results because people were paying money to vote.
 
Yes, he alluded to the fact that the free voting can (and probably will be) rigged. Then they cut the camera.

It's exactly what I've brought up here:
They don't care.

We don't even have a guarantee that the votes do anything.

In Australia if the voting is free, you don't have to actually follow it. The producers can evict whoever they want.

Back in the old days they had independent auditors checking the results because people were paying money to vote.

Has the same effect as a poll. No duty to disclose the result

E.g. most and least challenge. What consequences would there be for not following the vote? Basically nothing.
 
In case people are wondering who to vote for

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top