This argument is what I am so sick of hearing. The format of Big Brother was never to blame for it's cancelation or declining ratings. It was merely the execution of the show and poor production choices. It wasn't what they did with the show it was HOW they did it. The initial cancelation was inevitable after the Turkey Slap. The bad press as well as Gretel leaving there was no way 2008 was gonna rate higher than what it ended up. 2012 had promise, and had it actually had live feeds it would had sufficed as a regular BB season in my eyes. 2014 was so incredibly shit because of the lack of content we got with no live feeds and cancelation of live updates. As well as shifting the schedule multiple times in the series with eviction going from Tuesdays to Mondays to Wednesdays to Thursdays and then cutting the Sunday and Friday shows all together it was almost impossible to keep up with the show. 2014's late time slot is also hugely to blame for its ratings decline.
My point is the show's format is not to blame for its cancellation, that statement is redundant. A Tv show declines in ratings and popularity most of the time because producers work too hard to twist it and turn it to grab the ratings they are inevitably losing. Big Brother will always have interest factor and will always have win equity in terms of ratings, otherwise there wouldn't be 700,000 odd people watching it this year after it had been twice axed. Big Brother in it's normal format could have and WOULD have pulled a decent audience for 7, and anyone can tell me otherwise and I just simply won't concede.