Skip to main content

What would reepbot say?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Bluefin said:
Are you referring to YKW (formerly) in that context?
Click to expand...

Yes. It can be a bit hard to convey those sorts of feelings, especially on a forum such as this where mistrust is high. However I know how i feel and felt about all that and no one can take away or invalidate those feelings of mine.
 
reepbot said:
Yes. It can be a bit hard to convey those sorts of feelings, especially on a forum such as this where mistrust is high. However I know how i feel and felt about all that and no one can take away or invalidate those feelings of mine.
Click to expand...
Out of 10, in the context of you dispensing unsolicited advice, how would you rate your conduct in here over the last year?
 
reepbot said:
Yes. It can be a bit hard to convey those sorts of feelings, especially on a forum such as this where mistrust is high. However I know how i feel and felt about all that and no one can take away or invalidate those feelings of mine.
Click to expand...
I agree. It's a high mistrust environment, and your feelings are your business. I was just making the distinction between 'friends' and 'friends'.
 
Witty Banter said:
Do you think a groupthink conscience should be the same as a non groupthink conscience?
Click to expand...

I think that there are some lines you should just not cross, no matter how hurt or angry you might feel. Obviously you are talking about the posters who post in ot and have a strong friendship with trala when you refer to groupthink. But for me, the fact that mooseface and I, two people who are not close to trala at all, also agree with this so called 'groupthink' that your personal attacks on other posters is disgusting and wrong, show that this isn't about who is friends with who on here, but about basic human decency.
 
reepbot said:
I think that there are some lines you should just not cross, no matter how hurt or angry you might feel. Obviously you are talking about the posters who post in ot and have a strong friendship with trala when you refer to groupthink. But for me, the fact that mooseface and I, two people who are not close to trala at all, also agree with this so called 'groupthink' that your personal attacks on other posters is disgusting and wrong, show that this isn't about who is friends with who on here, but about basic human decency.
Click to expand...
Human decency is an abstract and herd concept that does not override logic and facts, or the law. I think you have herd potential that you place compassion above truth in your makeup. The truth is people do not condone of her conduct or they would be doing it themselves. Trollop's fabrication is far more disgusting than my pointing out actual truths, and your rutting stalker behaviour toward Inigo puts you in no position to pontificate.
 
Witty Banter said:
Human decency is an abstract and herd concept that does not override logic and facts, or the law. I think you have herd potential that you place compassion above truth in your makeup. The truth is people do not condone of her conduct or they would be doing it themselves. Trollop's fabrication is far more disgusting than my pointing out actual truths, and your rutting stalker behaviour toward Inigo puts you in no position to pontificate.
Click to expand...

Your behavior in this scenario has not been that logical either. If it was you would not be in this position in the first place. I place compassion above your so called truth because I am not a robot. I think it is silly to compare what Trala said about you to your actions because I do not believe in an eye for an eye approach.
 
reepbot said:
Your behavior in this scenario has not been that logical either. If it was you would not be in this position in the first place. I place compassion above your so called truth because I am not a robot. I think it is silly to compare what Trala said about you to your actions because I do not believe in an eye for an eye approach.
Click to expand...
How on Earth is my telling a truth versus Trollop telling a lie eye for an eye?
 
reepbot said:
This isn't about the truth. This is about you using a poster's past to try and hurt and humiliate them.
Click to expand...
Why should someone's public domain past be off-limits, particularly when it relates directly to credibility and decisions they actually made rather than cyber preaching hypotheticals of wisdom?
 
Witty Banter said:
How on Earth is my telling a truth versus Trollop telling a lie eye for an eye?
Click to expand...
Your arguing style is getting confused - if you want to go down the route of a factual argument, then name calling should not come into it - not sticking to the facts weakens your argument. You would get points off in a debate for that I am sure. A factual argument should actually refrain from all moralistic judgement and stick purely to the facts.
 
Witty Banter said:
Why should someone's public domain past be off-limits, particularly when it relates directly to credibility and decisions they actually made rather than cyber preaching hypotheticals of wisdom?
Click to expand...

Don't try and play the noble card with me. I think everyone is well aware that you bringing up stuff from Trala's past is not about you doing it for the greater good, but a chance for you to play dirty. Have a heart, Witty.
 
Isee said:
Your arguing style is getting confused - if you want to go down the route of a factual argument, then name calling should not come into it - not sticking to the facts weakens your argument. You would get points off in a debate for that I am sure. A factual argument should actually refrain from all moralistic judgement and stick purely to the facts.
Click to expand...
That's to fudge the daily metadata.
 
reepbot said:
Don't try and play the noble card with me. I think everyone is well aware that you bringing up stuff from Trala's past is not about you doing it for the greater good, but a chance for you to play dirty. Have a heart, Witty.
Click to expand...
I don't need to play the noble card as you wouldn't recognise it if you saw one :p
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top