-
Welcome to the discussion forums. To get posting, register an account.
Post BB - Housemate Antics 2013 - Part 2
- Thread starter Tim
- Start date
- Status
Veronica2005
Well-Known Member
Why would wearing high heeled boots shopping be something to be stared at? Plenty of people shop in high heeled boots. Was she just wearing high heeled boots and nothing else?? I don't understand that tweet
You mean to tell me you've never been stared at for wearing high heeled boots?! Well I never!
lol
Veronica2005
Well-Known Member
Straight Edge Society
Straight Edge Saviour
Why would wearing high heeled boots shopping be something to be stared at? Plenty of people shop in high heeled boots. Was she just wearing high heeled boots and nothing else?? I don't understand that tweet
Maybe they sort of recognized her and were trying to figure out from which show. Or they were working up the courage to ask for an autograph. It does not make sense. Maybe they just liked the boots and Tahan was in a bad mood and took it the wrong way. Maybe Tahan was blocking the cereal and taking her sweet time in moving. Maybe the person was pensive and just happened to be facing Tahan.
I'll stop now.
Veronica2005
Well-Known Member
smurfette
Well-Known Member
Maybe it wasnt the boots that were the problem - maybe she was wearing Tigermist
Veronica2005
Well-Known Member
believeachievept
43 seconds ago
At the @Austeenexpo wearing @barianoaustralia@tilkah dressed by @jamieazzopardi
43 seconds ago
At the @Austeenexpo wearing @barianoaustralia@tilkah dressed by @jamieazzopardi
Connoisseur
Well-Known Member
I've had people stare and smirk at me for no apparent reason to me. *shrugs* Maybe this is what happened to Tahan and like her I give them a dirty look in return.
I've been smirked at for wearing a tonne of makeup and wearing my laced stockings and fitted skirt at the shops. In my defence I was half dressed for a dress up party and needed to buy a birthday card last minute. I get embarrassed and try to get out of the persons view
Ok this is off topic, but bear with me a second.
The below article is on news.com.au
---------
Sarah Harris tries on her wedding dress: The private pictures we didn’t run
Sarah Harris (at right) with Studio 10 co-hosts Jessica Rowe, Joe Hildebrand and Ita Buttrose. Source: Supplied
THIS afternoon, a set of paparazzi pictures arrived in our inbox — as they do every day. These photos, however, were different.
They showed Studio 10 co-host Sarah Harris — hardly a Kardashian-esque household name, familiar with paparazzi intrusion — trying on her bridal gown ahead of her wedding this weekend to IT specialist Tom Ward.
The pictures were shot from the street outside, and Harris seemingly had no idea she was being photographed and that the big reveal on her wedding day was effectively being spoiled.
The photos show Harris ducking from view, as the bridal shop attendants hurriedly try to block the camera’s lens.
We’re used to seeing pictures of famous people in their private moments. Heck, more often than not we publish them.
Studio 10 anchor Sarah Harris will marry this weekend. Source: Supplied
But before we do there is always a quick confab with the team and the editors decide what will and what won’t be published.
It’s fast. It’s furious. The lines between public and private can often be blurred, and there’s fierce debate in the office about how best to handle sensitive pictures - or whether to touch them at all.
When these pics landed, they were met with a universal, polite “Publishing these would be poor form”.
A wedding dress is the one frock a bride-to-be likes to keep under wraps until the big day. Unlike the Kardashians, we’re pretty sure Sarah wouldn’t have had a spare gown waiting around to be popped on if her frock gets papped.
Obviously others didn’t think the same thing.
Within the hour, the pictures had been splashed across another Australian news website.
Hopefully it has not put a dampener on what we’re sure will be an amazing day.
-----------
Im confident I don't need to give you guys more than one guess as to which news site DID choose to publish them ??
The below article is on news.com.au
---------
Sarah Harris tries on her wedding dress: The private pictures we didn’t run
- 4 HOURS AGO JULY 16, 2014 5:55PM
Sarah Harris (at right) with Studio 10 co-hosts Jessica Rowe, Joe Hildebrand and Ita Buttrose. Source: Supplied
THIS afternoon, a set of paparazzi pictures arrived in our inbox — as they do every day. These photos, however, were different.
They showed Studio 10 co-host Sarah Harris — hardly a Kardashian-esque household name, familiar with paparazzi intrusion — trying on her bridal gown ahead of her wedding this weekend to IT specialist Tom Ward.
The pictures were shot from the street outside, and Harris seemingly had no idea she was being photographed and that the big reveal on her wedding day was effectively being spoiled.
The photos show Harris ducking from view, as the bridal shop attendants hurriedly try to block the camera’s lens.
We’re used to seeing pictures of famous people in their private moments. Heck, more often than not we publish them.
Studio 10 anchor Sarah Harris will marry this weekend. Source: Supplied
But before we do there is always a quick confab with the team and the editors decide what will and what won’t be published.
It’s fast. It’s furious. The lines between public and private can often be blurred, and there’s fierce debate in the office about how best to handle sensitive pictures - or whether to touch them at all.
When these pics landed, they were met with a universal, polite “Publishing these would be poor form”.
A wedding dress is the one frock a bride-to-be likes to keep under wraps until the big day. Unlike the Kardashians, we’re pretty sure Sarah wouldn’t have had a spare gown waiting around to be popped on if her frock gets papped.
Obviously others didn’t think the same thing.
Within the hour, the pictures had been splashed across another Australian news website.
Hopefully it has not put a dampener on what we’re sure will be an amazing day.
-----------
Im confident I don't need to give you guys more than one guess as to which news site DID choose to publish them ??
Veronica2005
Well-Known Member
LOL
unless they were the boots that Tahan had made for her victoria secrets b'day party?
smurfette
Well-Known Member
Ok this is off topic, but bear with me a second.
The below article is on news.com.au
---------
Sarah Harris tries on her wedding dress: The private pictures we didn’t run
- 4 HOURS AGO JULY 16, 2014 5:55PM
Sarah Harris (at right) with Studio 10 co-hosts Jessica Rowe, Joe Hildebrand and Ita Buttrose. Source: Supplied
THIS afternoon, a set of paparazzi pictures arrived in our inbox — as they do every day. These photos, however, were different.
They showed Studio 10 co-host Sarah Harris — hardly a Kardashian-esque household name, familiar with paparazzi intrusion — trying on her bridal gown ahead of her wedding this weekend to IT specialist Tom Ward.
The pictures were shot from the street outside, and Harris seemingly had no idea she was being photographed and that the big reveal on her wedding day was effectively being spoiled.
The photos show Harris ducking from view, as the bridal shop attendants hurriedly try to block the camera’s lens.
We’re used to seeing pictures of famous people in their private moments. Heck, more often than not we publish them.
Studio 10 anchor Sarah Harris will marry this weekend. Source: Supplied
But before we do there is always a quick confab with the team and the editors decide what will and what won’t be published.
It’s fast. It’s furious. The lines between public and private can often be blurred, and there’s fierce debate in the office about how best to handle sensitive pictures - or whether to touch them at all.
When these pics landed, they were met with a universal, polite “Publishing these would be poor form”.
A wedding dress is the one frock a bride-to-be likes to keep under wraps until the big day. Unlike the Kardashians, we’re pretty sure Sarah wouldn’t have had a spare gown waiting around to be popped on if her frock gets papped.
Obviously others didn’t think the same thing.
Within the hour, the pictures had been splashed across another Australian news website.
Hopefully it has not put a dampener on what we’re sure will be an amazing day.
-----------
Im confident I don't need to give you guys more than one guess as to which news site DID choose to publish them ??
That sucks
Veronica2005
Well-Known Member
Ok this is off topic, but bear with me a second.
The below article is on news.com.au
---------
Sarah Harris tries on her wedding dress: The private pictures we didn’t run
- 4 HOURS AGO JULY 16, 2014 5:55PM
Sarah Harris (at right) with Studio 10 co-hosts Jessica Rowe, Joe Hildebrand and Ita Buttrose. Source: Supplied
THIS afternoon, a set of paparazzi pictures arrived in our inbox — as they do every day. These photos, however, were different.
They showed Studio 10 co-host Sarah Harris — hardly a Kardashian-esque household name, familiar with paparazzi intrusion — trying on her bridal gown ahead of her wedding this weekend to IT specialist Tom Ward.
The pictures were shot from the street outside, and Harris seemingly had no idea she was being photographed and that the big reveal on her wedding day was effectively being spoiled.
The photos show Harris ducking from view, as the bridal shop attendants hurriedly try to block the camera’s lens.
We’re used to seeing pictures of famous people in their private moments. Heck, more often than not we publish them.
Studio 10 anchor Sarah Harris will marry this weekend. Source: Supplied
But before we do there is always a quick confab with the team and the editors decide what will and what won’t be published.
It’s fast. It’s furious. The lines between public and private can often be blurred, and there’s fierce debate in the office about how best to handle sensitive pictures - or whether to touch them at all.
When these pics landed, they were met with a universal, polite “Publishing these would be poor form”.
A wedding dress is the one frock a bride-to-be likes to keep under wraps until the big day. Unlike the Kardashians, we’re pretty sure Sarah wouldn’t have had a spare gown waiting around to be popped on if her frock gets papped.
Obviously others didn’t think the same thing.
Within the hour, the pictures had been splashed across another Australian news website.
Hopefully it has not put a dampener on what we’re sure will be an amazing day.
-----------
Im confident I don't need to give you guys more than one guess as to which news site DID choose to publish them ??
yep saw the article and photos
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbi...nal-fitting-shop-assistants-not-happy-it.html
It looks far better without the curtains. But I certainly would want to try to walk in a skirt that high
Piece of shit rag!
Straight Edge Society
Straight Edge Saviour
I can't relate I've never thought about actors/actresses hair and how they were relevant to up coming movies. Like I said you are far more in the know than me in this particular discussion.
Neither did I until it came up. So, its more superior logic than superior knowledge
I think it's more to do with how you think you look, as opposed to how you perceive people look at you. I've been dressed up for things and thought "people must think I look ridiculous" but I don't really know what they are thinking, I am just assuming they think that. Whereas, if I posted a photo of myself in a Tigermist outfit on Instagram and people said I look ridiculous on that photo, then it is them thinking that.
- Status