Finally got around to watching No Country for Old Men.
I have to say i was completely underwelmed by it. It never really engaged me and all seemed rather pointless. I understand some films speak to different people in different ways. This was some what interesting but eh kind of went no where. The whole subtext of the film seems to fit into the category of film making, to full appreciate you have to do further research and analysis, which annoys me. I want a film that when you leave you have all the clues and you then put it together in your thoughts. Maybe it's there, but the fact it didn't engage me, i don't really care or pay enough attention to the detail. Most likely the case.
Also what is with the crap about the bad guy being terrifying? He was kind of lame in my opinion. And the performance was nothing wonderful. It was good, but i don't understand all the praise. It seems like a character that you might find terrifying if you never watched many films with villains.
I didn't find it 'chilling' or whatever other terms people used to describe it.
It reminds me of when you see an old film that was meant to be shocking, such as a clock work orange. Its tame by todays standards and lacks the impact (although still a very good film). Cinema has changed a lot since it was out, the films that have come.
The way people talk about this, it feels they have missed the films that make this, not chilling, make the villian not terrifying. For a film that seems it was relying on this impact, when it's not up to snuff, it looses a lot. Then the rest of it just isn't enough to grab you.