Columbo
Never again
I'll bite to this week. Exactly what assumption was the "Inaccurate assumption" in reference to?
What post are you talking about?
I'll bite to this week. Exactly what assumption was the "Inaccurate assumption" in reference to?
The one where witty said I'd made an inaccurate assumption in my January post.What post are you talking about?
The one where witty said I'd made an inaccurate assumption in my January post.
Glad you asked. I'm not sure where the quotes around 'inaccurate' magically appeared from.The one where witty said I'd made an inaccurate assumption in my January post.
Looks like a beige Trojan horse to me.
Well. Well. Following your posts in here tonight and this thread recently, I can only assume this is directed to me, because I'm so literal. Obviously you found your new target some time ago, and in partnership with Reepbot.
If you were annoyed by any of my interactions both on the boards (which anyone can read and make their own judgments about), and a few PM's which you initiated originally, you should have said so directly and I would have respected that. Instead, all of the coded, abstract posting and continued interaction on the boards, of course, it's more sporting fun that way.
Lastly, your post above reads like a threat to hack into my communications with a malicious, Trojan virus.
Yes, "incorrect" rather than inaccurate.Glad you asked. I'm not sure where the quotes around 'inaccurate' magically appeared from.
I said Isee and Mooseface's 24 hour niceness challenge was beigewashing, and out of absolutely nowhere bluefin inserts herself into a tinfoil hat paranoid delusion. Anyone can see my Trojan horse comment is directed at Isee and Mooseface's 24 hour niceness challenge. It was even said in jest and you take it as a threat against your communications or that you are the centre? You didn't even play a large part in the conversation until this meltdown. You also blamed reepbot in your conspiracy theory. Read it.
Some of your posts are open to multiple interpretations... And in the context of other posts made at the time and prior, plus a security scare, I wouldn't call it what you just did. At all.So many redundant layers that you'll be buried in a pile of veils holding a handful of nothing.
You do realise that if reepbot and I, as you allege, were interfering or damaging your computer with a virus, that that would be a criminal offence?Yes, "incorrect" rather than inaccurate.
Did you forget this comment?
Some of your posts are open to multiple interpretations... And in the context of other posts made at the time and prior, plus a security scare, I wouldn't call it what you just did. At all.
I didn't accuse or allege. I said it read like a threat.You do realise that if reepbot and I, as you allege, were interfering or damaging your computer with a virus, that that would be a criminal offence?
I didn't accuse or allege. I said it read like a threat.
Explain Mooseface's question it was in response to, then.So you can't do it then? Is that what you are saying. 24 hours?
True. It was, and trala is still using that stored hacked data in the last week.That wouldn't make any logical sense considering a month or so back Witty himself was raising hell about his hacked data being displayed.
True. It was, and trala is still using that stored hacked data in the last week.
I think you might be a liability if I decided on a life of crime, like trala did. I might use you for a human shield or something.Oh ok.
I think you might be a liability if I decided on a life of crime, like trala did. I might use you for a human shield or something.
You'd get shaky and compassionate at inconvenient times, plus Murder She Wrote isn't that accurate. You'd be overconfident that you could outrun an eighty year old woman.Why would I be a liability.
You'd get shakey and compassionate at inconvenient times, plus Murder She Wrote isn't that accurate. You'd be overconfident that you could outrun an eighty year old woman.
It doesn't negate a different parallel interpretation.Explain Mooseface's question it was in response to, then.
Basic, garden variety common sense negates that particular one.It doesn't negate a different parallel interpretation.