Skip to main content

What would reepbot say?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Mooseface said:
Well I dont know about the whole apology thing from a few pages back but I am sorry to say that perhaps my desire to remain 'grounded' seems to be clashing too much with 'Affable' 's desire to be a drama queen rather than affable, and I really don't like conflict, and see no point to it, cannot be bothered with it, so I'll maybe/probably stick to lurking for the time being and maybe see you around somewhere else Reepbot if you ever venture out of this thread. (How on earth did he come up with THAT username?!)
Click to expand...

I find it funny you are putting yourself in a positive light, when you started it all.

First post I got offended at was the one you wrote sorry to me and trying to come across as superior with explaining grammar. Others may like that, but I don't.
 
Here's how the drama all started:

Mooseface said:
Ooohhhhh. That's not totally fair. Must of is just totally wrong (sorry Jordan, I don't mean to be mean). It is must have. That is how the verb is constructed. It's a verb we are using, not a preposition. It SOUNDS the same if you say it quickly but is totally different word construction. It's better to actually know how to construct it correctly if you are ever going to need to write correspondence etc.
Click to expand...

You clearly stated that you don't mean to be mean but when I read that, I read it as mean. Then you posted your grammar superiority complex in explaining the context, which I am not tolerating at all.
 
Affable said:
I find it funny you are putting yourself in a positive light, when you started it all.

First post I got offended at was the one you wrote sorry to me and trying to come across as superior with explaining grammar. Others may like that, but I don't.
Click to expand...

I don't think she came across as superior.
 
reepbot said:
I am equal to no one here. Everyone here is better than me. I bow to them.[DOUBLEPOST=1449373758][/DOUBLEPOST]

Texts can have multiple interpretations.
Click to expand...

Well then, there you go.

I read it as mean with a superiority complex and quite condescending.
 
reepbot said:
But it is true. Who am i better than?[DOUBLEPOST=1449373982][/DOUBLEPOST]

I read it as kind and caring.
Click to expand...

I don't see how being mean (which was admitted to) can come across as kind and caring but okay then.

Well, you are definitely more well liked than me on here.
 
The written word is often interpreted by your own frame of reference, so while I am like @reepbot and don't see that @Mooseface meant to upset you, this is the way you see it from your view @Affable.

I also saw you trying to correct @Witty Banter for the rolleyes comment that could be interpreted in the same vain, so it seems a little strange to complain about someone when you do the same.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top