Skip to main content

What would reepbot say?

Status
Not open for further replies.
reepbot said:
More graceful than that. I would like to be more graceful. Like a swan dancing on a lake. Yes, I could be a wonderful swan who loves to dance on the lake in which I live in. But soon a group of nasty swans mock me for having the nerve to dance when they are clearly the better dancers. I decline to point out that their dancing is unclear and haphazard with no real technical brilliance or even passion. Annoyed at me not taking the bait they challenge me to a dance off..

Yes, that sounds like a good story. I think I shall call it Swan......Lake.
Click to expand...
Ah well, you better start writing then.
 
Isee said:
again with the misjudging my intentions Witty. I was merely making a joke with the stereotype comment. And take the comment re intellectual stimulation as the compliment it was meant to be. I think you are an intelligent man who enjoys intelligent conversation.
Click to expand...
I'm not misjudging your intentions. They're right here. Making deliberate smalltalk with someone you feel the following about is textbook deflection (which you deny), and yes, attempting to modify someone else's behaviour with deliberately indirect methods is patronising(which you deny). I stand by it 100% and anyone capable of critical thinking would too.
Isee said:
Sounds like an option to consider Reepbot... stay here with someone who puts you down as your main source of company, or go somewhere where people are inviting you and get to chat to more people. I am sure moosy-moose moose and I will chat to you wherever you are!
Click to expand...
 
reepbot said:
i best do.

how do you rate my spelling and grammar??????
Click to expand...
I don't! As in I'm not the one to rate it because it's clear that I'm not a spelling and grammar nazi.
How do you rate my spelling and grammar??????
 
Witty Banter said:
I'm not misjudging your intentions. They're right here. Making deliberate smalltalk with someone you feel the following about is textbook deflection (which you deny), and yes, attempting to modify someone else's behaviour with deliberately indirect methods is patronising(which you deny). I stand by it 100% and anyone capable of critical thinking would too.
Click to expand...
you see what you see, I see what I see - depends on your frame of reference.
 
Witty Banter said:
I'm not misjudging your intentions. They're right here. Making deliberate smalltalk with someone you feel the following about is textbook deflection (which you deny), and yes, attempting to modify someone else's behaviour with deliberately indirect methods is patronising(which you deny). I stand by it 100% and anyone capable of critical thinking would too.
Click to expand...

In a battle of my soul or mind Isee will always win out against you. That is the way it is.
 
Bluefin said:
I don't! As in I'm not the one to rate it because it's clear that I'm not a spelling and grammar nazi.
How do you rate my spelling and grammar??????
Click to expand...

Fine. I think. I mean I think the most important part of writing is to be able to communicate clearly to the reader. Simple words with big ideas is much better to read than complex words with poorly thought out aguments.
 
Witty Banter said:
So you have strong powers of feeling observation?
Click to expand...

I don't like to overthink things. When i do my brain can become stuck sometimes. Much better to rely on feelings than overthinking something I feel. Or at least it is for me.

So who is on whose side in the witty v rreepbot civil warrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top