Mooseface
Little known member
have. Not of.I was thinking she could of bought the DVD for Christmas![]()
have. Not of.I was thinking she could of bought the DVD for Christmas![]()
have. Not of.
A matter of taste Mooseface. I gave it a cursory go the other night and a few of us were posting "live" like the daily show thread days.So - what do you think of it? Is it interesting?
Yes. I have got that idea. But I dont read all your posts so I only correct when I actually notice it. Does your dream job require good language skills?I thought by doing it 3 times today that you would of got the idea that I am not listening to grammar corrections.
Yes. I have got that idea. But I dont read all your posts so I only correct when I actually notice it. Does your dream job require good language skills?
Yes evil glamour bitchy role models doesnt sound like my cup of tea. I'll stick with iview.A matter of taste Mooseface. I gave it a cursory go the other night and a few of us were posting "live" like the daily show thread days.
Personally, not for me. I expect dramatics. I will grudgingly accept amateur dramatics if they are slap-sticky. Neither on display here. And I am fearful for its various evil bitchy role models with glamourous attitude to take root in young impressionable minds.
I also quickly realised that affables gifs are basically like a novella of the series so there was no real need to watch further.
A picture of Inigo on the mirror could of been more realistic?
Didnt notice it that time.You read it before. reepbot and yourself commented on it and forgot to correct me.![]()
Ah yes. Well correctly expressed its could have not could of.@Mooseface @reepbot : here is the infringing post you forgot to pick up on with the grammar.
Didnt notice it that time.
Ah yes. Well correctly expressed its could have not could of.
I dont understand why you would intentionally WANT to appear to be dumb. But each to their own. Not my cup of tea.Most of the time it is because I either write too fast and shorten words or I do it on purpose. Alternate between the two, but I understand how it is properly written.[DOUBLEPOST=1450530593][/DOUBLEPOST]
Self correction shows that I know it. That time I think it was because I was typing too fast and tend to shorten words.
I dont understand why you would intentionally WANT to appear to be dumb. But each to their own. Not my cup of tea.
@Mooseface @reepbot : here is the infringing post you forgot to pick up on with the grammar.
I don't really care that much.
I dont understand why you would intentionally WANT to appear to be dumb. But each to their own. Not my cup of tea.
It would make the getting a job process easier, thats for sure, if the job requires half decent written english skills.More so the fast typing. I think if I shorten it to must've, should've or could've, it would make the whole process easier.
Well, you did when you corrected me 2 days ago..
Are you telling tuttletales?Tuttle wagged English and ended up a career limited grump. Let that be a lesson for us all.