In the jungle the mighty jungle ...
It was removed by the moderators as you well know.
One can still see the hole in the thread stream produced by mod blatting/hiding here:
http://forum.behindbigbrother.com/showthread.php?45179-In-The-News/page51&p=1470613#post1470613 and it was a reply to "Foul n Sic"s response to our Eliza of
Pass me a bucket someone. You're a control freak - pure and simple."
There was not even the slightest hint of a mention of "prostitution" in my 12 sentence response but rather I waxed on somewhat brutally on the topic of left-ardism / the state / control / personal responsibility, the forum hack, and then completed my missive with the following quote about Fabian Socialist Julia Gillard:
Ever wondered why juLiar Killard seems hell bent on ruining this country in the face of derision and eviction ?
I suspect it is because she is an exceedingly bitter and twisted and nasty woman who knows full well she has stuffed things up and is on the way out but is so proud and so nasty that she is already trying to get her revenge upon the country for rejecting her.
"Hell Hath No Fury ..." and all that.
Wow, seeing that post again (which has been sitting in my sparesely populated/un-culled PM folder ever since it was quoted back at me by a mod) has now made me wonder how long it has been since I stopped using the "killard" thang and instead began referring to our worst PM eva as simply "Fabian Socialist Julia Gillard".
Anyhoo, nup, not even the tiniest hint of me doing as our Eliza has alleged re:
"referred to my daughter as a prostitute"
Also, surely if I had made such a reference needing reporting and blatting, there would remain some sort of record of it, yes ? A quote and/or link forwarded by some sort of "report post" ? A "PM" record and response ? A copy taken just in case the original disappeared or changed ?
In short, surely you have SOMETHING to back up your claim, especially if it was so offensive and hurtful that it allegedly required removal by a moderator ? And if indeed that sort of mod attention was warranted, wouldn't I also have received some sort of penalty and/or warning for it ? Something that would show up in my user record and PM inbox and sent box (I usually acknowledge mod pings, either to basically say "fair cop" or argue my case) ?
No ?
The reality is that the last ping I got was on the 7th of April 2012 and it was in relation to the deleted post mentioned above (that didn't mention prostitution in even the slightest) and the most recent ping prior to that was on the 24th of July 2009, (yes, 2009 !) and was in relation to the "Queen Bee" fun and games Triple-K and I were having at the time.
Soooooo ... what's ya response to that ? Do you think you may have been mistaken ?
Over to you.
Truthfulness and logic? Yeah that's hilarious coming from derspatz. The king of changing his "facts" every time it suits his current rant or his personal situation changes.
ooooh, that's all lies that is !
Do feel free to put up kingly quantities of me allegedly changing my facts. Actually, feel free to put merely a peasantish quantity. "Link away" my dear and let us all examine with our own eyes that which you deem to be a changing of facts.
yeah, "put up or shut up".
There is no way you would let it pass if you thought I'd lied about you. It's bullshit. You talk absolute shit derspatz.
It would be somewhat unfair of me to demand links from you if I weren't prepared to supply links myself, so here ya go, a link to your lies about me. Click:
http://forum.behindbigbrother.com/showthread.php?48467-2013-Today-I&p=1609328&viewfull=1#post1609328 and note how it contains you most falsely declaring:
wynter said:
Derspatz has repeatedly told Eliza over the years that her opinion has no value, and that was one of the nicer things he's said to her. Partly its supposedly because she's government employed but no doubt a big part of that is because she's female - and a mother. Your sweet derspatz has decided opinions on both and neither is flattering.
... all of which was and is far from the truth. All of which, in the message stream context it was delivered in, seemed to me to simply be snarly slander being delivered by an embittered forum member who has been caught between the twin horns of a logical dilemma of their own making for years now.
Considering the over-all tone of the thread at that time, rather than individually address all the slander and general making merry of me that had been going, I decided it both suitable and more fun to simply address it all with the following, as quoted out of my general reply here:
http://forum.behindbigbrother.com/showthread.php?48467-2013-Today-I&p=1609543&viewfull=1#post1609543
derspatz said:
Back to things forummy though ...
Like, WTH ?
Was it something I didn't say ? lol.
Anyhoo, as a Vulcan (as opposed to a Vogon) might put it:
[youtubevid]cFods1KSWsQ[/youtubevid]
Those who bothered to read it might have "got it" while I presumed it would be all too hard for folk like you and you'd sail straight by it.
So, as perhaps you now can see and maybe even realise, by not specifically addressing my response to any one person, I managed to both "let it pass" re: your lies, while not actually letting it pass, for indeed it WAS "all about something I didn't say."
How "carefully considered" of me, eh ?
I doubt if it was as good for you as it was for me though.
Just because I'm not a psycho nut job who keeps copies of everything everyone says and information files on everyone they meet online like you do, doesn't mean there is anything wrong with my memory. Just because a lot of your more disgusting posts get deleted doesn't mean they didn't happen.
ooooh, that's all lies that is !
... and a whole bunch of slander to boot.
ButOfCourse your subjectively determined morality means you can put your nose in the air and declare, Fabian Socialist Julia Gillard like, that you've "done nothing wrong", yes ?
Yeah, don't close the thread before I get to say to this: Ugh. Ugh.
I would suggest, DS, rather than "manish" you speak arrogant wankerese.
Surely you don't support a group-think collectivist inner-totalitarianism desire to censor opinions and views being discussed that you might not personally agree with or that you find confronting ?
As for "arrogant wankerese", I can't say I'm familiar with that one but am certainly familiar with the two edged sword called "psychological projection".
Anyhoo,
"hi honeys, I'm home ... what's for dinner ?"
[youtubevid]cYvcqhuydWY[/youtubevid]
[youtubevid]O8milJNj_W0[/youtubevid]
regarDS
