Skip to main content

Priya Appreciation Society

Disrespectful to those who:
(1) are regular church-goers
(2) have strong religious beliefs, and lastly,
(3) those who believe that god is real.
I disagree completely. We haven't ridiculed or attacked any religious people or any religion; we only talk about Pristianity. People can believe whatever they want.
 
I disagree completely. We haven't ridiculed or attacked any religious people or any religion; we only talk about Pristianity. People can believe whatever they want.

No, there have been ridiculing and attacking of religious people.

The photo-shopping of religious material with Priya's face on them is a sin in itself.

You can believe what you want but from what I have seen, it is an attack and not appropriate.
 
No, there have been ridiculing and attacking of religious people.

The photo-shopping of religious material with Priya's face on them is a sin in itself.

You can believe what you want but from what I have seen, it is an attack and not appropriate.
The pictures of Jesus and others were created by people. If it's a sin to photoshop them, then it's a sin only for people of that religion to do it, because sins don't apply to people outside the religion.

It is not an attack, it's a joke, not at the expense of ANYONE.
 
The pictures of Jesus and others were created by people. If it's a sin to photoshop them, then it's a sin only for people of that religion to do it, because sins don't apply to people outside the religion.

It is not an attack, it's a joke, not at the expense of ANYONE.

I don't see how religion can be seen as a 'joke'.. It is not a joke to many people out there and is a sensitive subject.

Those pictures were created by others?? It doesn't matter who they were created by - what matters is the context of religious material being vandalized and disrespect of peoples religion. I don't find this amusing at all and I find this quite disgusting.
 
I don't see how religion can be seen as a 'joke'.. It is not a joke to many people out there and is a sensitive subject.

Those pictures were created by others?? It doesn't matter who they were created by - what matters is the context of religious material being vandalized and disrespect of peoples religion. I don't find this amusing at all and I find this quite disgusting.
I didn't say that religion is a joke, I said that Pristianity is a joke.
Religious material is not being vandalised. Pictures of Jesus (which are most likely very inaccurate depictions of him due to Eurocentric views of the world ) have been photoshopped. Why should any religious people care? It doesn't affect them. If they think it's a sin and that we're going to hell because of it, they can just keep believing that.
 
Even THOUGH I have had the PLEASURE of NOT BEING ABLE TO SEE ITS POSTS since SEPTEMBER, it has come to my ATTENTION that this SIMPERING LITTLE CUNT @JordanS continues to be JUST THAT ITT.



http://www.behindbigbrother.com/forums/threads/priya-appreciation-society.51396/page-36#post-1960080

And MANY, MANY MORE.

You can LEAVE now xo

Nice honey.

Just like you are not ashamed to vandalize religious material. You are quite disgusting..[DOUBLEPOST=1415777353][/DOUBLEPOST]
:jawdrop::jawdrop::jawdrop: @JordanS , SO DISRESPECTFUL! :eek::eek::eek:

Well I am not the one vandalizing religious material like a little bitch.

Madonna is such a little bitch.
 
Well I am not the one vandalizing religious material like a little bitch.

Madonna is such a little bitch.
vandalize
ˈvand(ə)lʌɪz/

verb
verb: vandalise
  1. deliberately destroy or damage (public or private property).
    "stations have been vandalized beyond recognition"

Are you aware that pictures on the internet can be copied? Madonna has not stolen and destroyed original pieces of artwork.
 
vandalize
ˈvand(ə)lʌɪz/

verb
verb: vandalise
  1. deliberately destroy or damage (public or private property).
    "stations have been vandalized beyond recognition"

Are you aware that pictures on the internet can be copied? Madonna has not stolen and destroyed original pieces of artwork.

Actually, what MADONNA is doing is a deliberate action of destroying public property and re-publishing.

That is vandalism. Put it in any way that you want. The fact that it is religious material is even more disgusting....

It is and always will be vandalism.
 
Actually, what MADONNA is doing is a deliberate action of destroying public property and re-publishing.

That is vandalism. Put it in any way that you want. The fact that it is religious material is even more disgusting....

It is and always will be vandalism.
There is literally no destruction involved though, so your argument is invalid. Sorry. xo
 
There is literally no destruction involved though, so your argument is invalid. Sorry. xo

There is destruction involved. It is religious material.

Plus, most of those images are copyright. You do realize that, right? He is potentially breaking copyright laws as well.

Your argument is actually invalid. Unless you have a valid point to raise, don't bother replying to this post because you lack critical analysis.
 
There is destruction involved. It is religious material.

Plus, most of those images are copyright. You do realize that, right? He is potentially breaking copyright laws as well.

Your argument is actually invalid. Unless you have a valid point to raise, don't bother replying to this post because you lack critical analysis.
xo4aag.jpg

As if you've never used a picture from the internet that didn't belong to you... :rolleyes:
 
Back
Top