Skip to main content

Episode BBAU 2023 Uncut - Week 4 Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
MAC.jpg

sav0001 said:
I don't think younger people really think like that. And these days much less would be shown than in the channel 10 days anyway.
Click to expand...
Young people don't think about many things and consequences.

Brekkie said:
If they're that controlling they're not worth it anyway. Really don't think it's the thing it was nowadays anyway in an era when OnlyFans is becoming a socially acceptable career path.

I think you're more likely to get ribbed for life about having such a small penis you showered in shorts for three months than there being a few pics of your dick out there. Chances are you're going yo get caught naked on camera at some point anyhow so you might as well just go with it.
Click to expand...

I don't see not wanting easily found nudes of a partner online as controlling. In the era of dicks pics and phones. It still isn't easy or possible to find pictures of any random person. "He/she on Big Brother?" Invites invitation to look.

I understand many in the younger generation don't care about privacy but that's a lost value which will be to the detriment of society as everything is becoming more authoritarian.

I also consider it a bit immature to assume someone not wanting to publicly shower, which being on BB is, to have a small dick. One thing to factor in is, that most people would never get cast on BB if they applied. So this is talking from the perspective of someone who wouldn't get cast on the show. One of those reasons is because they're of a personality less likely to shower nude in front of cameras for broadcast.

Onlyfans is something that exploits the vast majority of people on the platform for the benefit of a small few. It's not normalised no matter how the degenerate media try and pretend it is.
 
Kingston said:
I think you’d be surprised what you could find in certain corners of the internet.
Click to expand...
hence why in high school we were always told to be mindful of both what we post, and what we let others post of/about us, online, as potential employers/further education institutions can and do view someones digital footprint when they are considering offers of employment/enrolment.
 
Gayspie said:
hence why in high school we were always told to be mindful of both what we post, and what we let others post of/about us, online, as potential employers/further education institutions can and do view someones digital footprint when they are considering offers of employment/enrolment.
Click to expand...
That is a bit of an outdated and over simplified view of online safety/ones digital footprint. Being mindful of what your legacy is online is important but using fear tactics that they could be slut shamed by a future employer or the likes is absolutely ridiculous.
 
Kingston said:
That is a bit of an outdated and over simplified view of online safety/ones digital footprint. Being mindful of what your legacy is online is important but using fear tactics that they could be slut shamed by a future employer or the likes is absolutely ridiculous.
Click to expand...
Its not just slut shaming that we were warned to be careful about. for example, we were warned to be careful about posting public photos of us going out drinking/partying every weekend, because potential employers upon a search of our social medias could think that we would be unreliable at least or rocking up to work drunk at worst, hence not give us the job.
 
Gayspie said:
Its not just slut shaming that we were warned to be careful about. for example, we were warned to be careful about posting public photos of us going out drinking/partying every weekend, because potential employers upon a search of our social medias could think that we would be unreliable at least or rocking up to work drunk at worst, hence not give us the job.
Click to expand...
What you’ve described is no different.
 
Gayspie said:
Well if i were employing someone i would not want them to be continually missing shifts from being hungover or rocking up to work wasted.
Click to expand...
Please. My work knew I was going to a festival on the weekend, and when someone said I was covering a shift on the Sunday my manger just said “lol is Dennis even alive”.

The judgemental mindset regarding social media is on its way out. If it’s pictures of people doing drugs or engaging in illegal activity then that’s different, but there’s no reason to assume someone is an unreliable worker based on how they spend their free time.
 
Exactly - nowadays the managers probably partied much harder than their young employees. I suspect many would view having an active social life as a positive.
 
Ok caught up on this one too. Some banana sizing, Sex tips from Taylah and positions (including not one but two simulations between Lewis and Louis and a lap dance in the truth/dare Haha).

And Louis doing some awkward Whip/Nae nae's dance there lol.
 
Isee said:
What someone's behaviour is like when they are 16 might be different than when they are 26, or 36. At what point do you stop judging them for their past behaviour?
Click to expand...
ahh the question for the ages... i think what our teachers were more aiming this message at is all the teenagers who are applying for their first job at maccas or kmart, of whom said employers have plenty of pocket-money hungry local teenagers to choose from, hence would have no qualms in not hiring a teen who parties a bit too hard for their liking.
 
Gayspie said:
ahh the question for the ages... i think what our teachers were more aiming this message at is all the teenagers who are applying for their first job at maccas or kmart, of whom said employers have plenty of pocket-money hungry local teenagers to choose from, hence would have no qualms in not hiring a teen who parties a bit too hard for their liking.
Click to expand...
This angle is even more unethical than the last. Just quit already.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top