andrewpatrick_
Well-Known Member
The group performances we got in the later seasons at the finale were chaotic AF
The 2008 one to me is my favourite!! So many memories about Untouched by the VeronicasThe group performances we got in the later seasons at the finale were chaotic AF
The system is also to blame for Camilla's loss (the final graph is a tad manipulated because they showed the %s at the start).That finale was so long! I kept coming and going and there would still be so much to go!
And, please, they both had 50% of the save votes… I’m so confused by that final graph but clearly this is something I will never understand.
The system is also to blame for Camilla's loss (the final graph is a tad manipulated because they showed the %s at the start).
Camilla had more save votes than Jamie but she also had the most evict votes due to being polarising. Even though both of them ended up having more total save votes than evict votes anyway, Camilla received more evict votes which cancelled out enough of her save votes to lose to Jamie.
Against my own better judgement I'm gonna give this a crack. Just assume that more people vote to save for some reason:I’m so confused by that final graph but clearly this is something I will never understand.
For me personally at this time I would probably say he's a top 3 winner from the ten era. And I would even argue that it is a definitive top 3, mostly because theres only three winners who weren't under edited.Oh yeah this much actually makes sense and is really annoying! Jamie is fine. I didn’t love him but he seemed like an ok guy but he was not a worthy winner like Camilla. But a step up from the year before!
FTFYmostly because theres only three winners who were remotely worthy.
yeah you're right, lets just say it as it isFTFY
Oh and of the also rans I'd put Terri last.
Against my own better judgement I'm gonna give this a crack. Just assume that more people vote to save for some reason:
Say there are 1000 votes to save and Jamie got 600 (60%) and Camilla got 400 (40%)
And there are 500 votes to evict and Jamie got 250 (50%) and Camilla got 250 (50%)
Overall, Jamie gets 600-250=450 to save, and Camilla gets 400-250=150 to save. Of a net total of 600 that's 75% Jamie to 25% Camilla.
It never makes sense on screen because they only ever state percentages of numbers they never disclose.
Also I think more people vote to evict than save but the point remains the same.
For me personally at this time I would probably say he's a top 3 winner from the ten era. And I would even argue that it is a definitive top 3, mostly because theres only three winners who weren't under edited.
1: Reggie
2: Aleisha
3: Jamie
4: Ben
5: Trevor
6: Terri
7: Greg
8: Peter
I'm sure it's a commercial-in-confidence kinda thing. They don't want to reveal that kind of viewer participation to the other networks.This does actually make some sense to me. There is hope! If they shared the number of votes instead then maybe it would be clearer for he but I do realise that is not practical.