Hunter's_Mckay
Well-Known Member
Michael is similar to Ben from BB03 to me in that he's obviously a massive twat, but he was very entertaining to watch and he definitely had a point over the editing. John was right in that Michael would have made a great Survivor Villain with an obvious post merge downfall.This is difficult and probably unpopular to say and articulate properly. Ive re-read the thread since Im watching 2006 and came across the Michael v gretal argument.
I have the greatest respect for gretal. Her intelligence and insight . Her ability to transition seamlessly. But....
She has an ingrained superiority complex. No doubt compared to Sonia she is a much more intelligent host. But I dont think she ever was particularly balanced and had inherent biases. Sonia, for all her faults, let the river flow. That may be boring I agree but its fair. Its time for the housemates to tell their story not act as judge and jury as to their responses. Questioning them on their responses is fine up to a point. But to go into full argumentative mode is not the role of a host. Its not up to the host to have inherent biases, cast basically snooty asides but in fact to be ruthlessly unbiased to the best of their ability.
She lost her cool. In a nutshell. No other way to describe it. She is beyond capable as a thinking woman but not fair and equitable in dealing with housemates due to her self-beliefs. This is not host material. It could be and she is more than capable but she is such a strong willed intelligent woman she forgets her place as host..Personal bias should never enter into her role. The obvious man-hating is excusable as its almost parody.
But to lose her cool demeans her superb qualities. It simply shouldnt ever happen.
I am sure saxon agrees.