Columbo
Never again
What sounds romantic about that to you?
That he will love her forever.
What sounds romantic about that to you?
It's seriously creepy. He said he will be in love with her forever. So if he ever does date again, the poor girl will have to deal with that.
...if Jarrod holds up Sophie as a benchmark for any other future girlfriend to achieve then he will be single forever methinks!... that's a very bold statement to make... he will die a lonely man... cheers.
That he will love her forever.
He says that now but I doubt he will feel the same in a few years time. Especially if he finds the right person for him.It's seriously creepy. He said he will be in love with her forever. So if he ever does date again, the poor girl will have to deal with that.
It's not romantic if the object of your desire doesn't love you. That is when it becomes an unhealthy obsession. Presumably he won't stay single forever, so future partners are going to have to deal with his declaration of never-ending love for Sophie Monk. Do you see now?
I'd say it is better to be happy and alone rather than settling with someone.
He says that now but I doubt he will feel the same in a few years time. Especially if he finds the right person for him.
...yes for some people my friend... but I for one love having my sweet darling wife... I have been one of the lucky ones... not all people find love whether or not it is just bad luck or intentional... each to their own I guess?... cheers.
why do you think jarrod wasn't right for sophie compared to Stu?
For me it is because with jarrod the conversation always felt more forced and emphasised like he was constantly convincing her of his undying love for her. With stu there was a lot more ease and naturalness to the conversation flow... It felt like mutual respect of two people who saw each others as equals not as one who has another on a pedistool.why do you think jarrod wasn't right for sophie compared to Stu?
Because she doesn't love him?!?
For me it is because with jarrod the conversation always felt more forced and emphasised like he was constantly convincing her of his undying love for her. With stu there was a lot more ease and naturalness to the conversation flow... It felt like mutual respect of two people who saw each others as equals not as one who has another on a pedistool.
I wanted more analysis than that.
Sometimes the right answer is the simplest one.
Do you think someone can be "right" for someone who doesn't love them? If it's one-sided, how can they be right for each other?
I wanted a 5,000 word analysis with references to at least several daily mail articles!
Forever is a long time to devote emotions to a person who does not reciprocate them. What starts as sweet would slowly embitter that person as they are bound to a lonely and sad existance of loving somone who does not warrent having that love as they do not want it.That he will love her forever.
Write it for toastmasters then.
Forever is a long time to devote emotions to a person who does not reciprocate them. What starts as sweet would slowly embitter that person as they are bound to a lonely and sad existance of loving somone who does not warrent having that love as they do not want it.